Liam Broady vs Enzo Wallart Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 17 Oct at 02:05 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Broady vs E. Wallart

GBR
2
Win
Played
1
Win

FRA
2
Win
Played
1
Win
Head-to-head: Broady 2 - 1 Wallart
They have played 7 sets in total, with Liam Broady winning 4 and Enzo Wallart winning 3. The last match between Liam Broady and Enzo Wallart was at the M15 Villers-les-Nancy, 17-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: I.hard, with Liam Broady getting the victory 3-2 ret..
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Broady | 2 |
| Wallart | 1 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Villers-les-Nancy(10-17-25)
(Q1) Hersonissos 4 Challenger(08-17-25)
(Q1) St. Tropez Challenger(09-15-24)
L. Broady vs E. Wallart H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $1,004,050 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 58.50% (530-376) | Career Total W/L | 52.87% (129-115) |
| 1 | Hard | 1 |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 13 | Titles | 1 |
| 2 | Total H2H Matches | 1 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
L. Broady vs E. Wallart Match Preview:
- Second Serve Performance: Liam Broady has a slight edge with a 41.90% success rate on second serve points in the last six months, compared to Enzo Wallart's 39.90%. Could this be a determining factor in the match outcome? Likely yes, as second serve performance closely correlates with match predictions.
- Return Game: On second serve returns, Enzo Wallart outperforms by winning 48.90% of points against opponents' serves, whereas Liam Broady captures 40.58%. However, for first serve returns, both players show nearly identical results with Broady at 25.49% and Wallart at 25.23%.
- Pressure Handling: Broady has saved 47.93% of breakpoints recently, slightly higher than Wallart's 46.77%. How crucial will this be in high-pressure moments? Quite significant, particularly for in-game strategies.
- Overall Performance: In the past year, Broady has a superior win rate of 74.32%, trumping Wallart's 52.94%. Does Broady's higher win percentage indicate a stronger likelihood of victory? Statistics suggest he is better positioned.
- Surface Strengths: Broady excels on Hard courts with a 63% career win rate, while Wallart's forte is on Clay, matching that same percentage. Given the upcoming match is on a Hard surface, Broady may have the upper hand.
- Player Level and Experience: Broady's success in Futures/ITF events ($10K) is notable with a 77.61% win rate, compared to Wallart's 57.14%, reflecting Broady's strength at this level of competition.
- Head-to-Head Record: The players stand even in direct confrontations, each winning one match from their two encounters, with set wins split down the middle. Their last match saw Wallart claim victory on Hard, the same surface as the upcoming clash.
- Deciding Set Performance: Broady is stronger in deciding sets, winning 58% over the past year, whereas Wallart wins only 17%, potentially a critical advantage if this match extends to a final set.
- Quality of Opponents: Broady has faced stronger competitors, with an average opponent rank of 392.31, while Wallart's opponents have averaged a rank of 488.68, likely providing Broady with more rigorous match experience.
Editorial Prediction (October 17, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming tennis match presents a closely contested scenario, with both Liam Broady and Enzo Wallart having shared previous victories evenly. However, Broady's slightly superior statistics in several crucial areas may tilt the balance in his favor.
Broady's strength on Hard courts and better historical performance in tight match situations, such as deciding sets, provide him an edge over Wallart. Additionally, his encounters against higher-ranked opponents potentially offer greater preparation and confidence heading into this match.
Despite Wallart’s recent win on this surface type and his robust second serve return performance, the comprehensive analysis suggests that Liam Broady holds a marginal advantage, positioning him as the likely winner for the upcoming match.
Liam Broady vs Enzo Wallart Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Broady vs E. Wallart H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 31 | Games Won | 27 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 13 |
| 17 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:49:6 | Average Match Time | 1:49:6 |
| 60% (101/168) | 1st Serve % | 60% (122/202) |
| 78% (79/101) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (83/122) |
| 42% (28/67) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (35/80) |
| 35% (8/23) | Break Pts Won % | 46% (6/13) |
| 42% (84/202) | Return Points Win % | 36% (61/168) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 50% (1/2) |
| 50% (1/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Broady Recent Matches Played
E. Wallart Recent Matches Played

L. Broady vs E. Wallart Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 58.50% (530/376) | YTD Win/Loss | 52.87% (129/115) |
| 57.02% (1194/900) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.90% (297/244) |
| 52.98% (10430/9256) | Games Win/Loss | 52.52% (2582/2334) |
| 63.23% (282/164) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.22% (90/76) |
| 54.93% (78/64) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.67% (17/13) |
| 60.35% (137/90) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.83% (22/26) |
| 36.26% (33/58) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.26 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 2465 | Aces Total | 761 |
| 0.16 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 1576 | Total Double Faults | 420 |
| 1:14:22 | Average Match Time | 1:16:52 |
| 514.76 | Average Opponent Rank | 429.51 |
| 63% (30207/48040) | 1st Serve % | 62% (6945/11183) |
| 68% (20601/30207) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (4793/6945) |
| 52% (9314/17826) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (2095/4237) |
| 43% (2042/4741) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (482/1099) |
| 40% (19013/47658) | Return Points Win % | 40% (4480/11137) |
| 47.27% (26/29) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 45.98% (40/47) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 55.50% (227/182) | Challenger W/L | 38.64% (17/27) |
| 67.46% (226/109) | Futures W/L | 56.00% (112/88) |
| 59% (519/878) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (126/234) |
| 35% (6/17) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 51% (137/271) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 54% (29/54) |
| 52% (141/269) | Deciding Set Win % | 31% (18/59) |
| 87% (520/454) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (135/118) |
| 13% (520/65) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (135/17) |
| 20% (384/76) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 9% (109/10) |