Lilli Tagger vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 07:06 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
L. Tagger vs E. Cocciaretto

AUT
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Tagger 1 - 0 Cocciaretto
They have played 2 sets in total, with Lilli Tagger winning 2 and Elisabetta Cocciaretto winning 0. The last match between Lilli Tagger and Elisabetta Cocciaretto was at the Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang, 29-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Lilli Tagger getting the victory 6-4 6-2.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Tagger | 1 |
| Cocciaretto | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Jiangxi Open - Jiujiang(10-29-25)
L. Tagger vs E. Cocciaretto H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $21,484 | Career Prize Money | $1,903,234 |
| 66.67% (60-30) | Career Total W/L | 60.61% (220-143) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Titles | 11 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 80.00% (4-1) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.59% (17-22) |
L. Tagger vs E. Cocciaretto Match Preview:
- Elisabetta Cocciaretto has a slight edge in second serve performance, winning 41.21% of points compared to Lilli Tagger's 39.33% over the past six months.
- In return games, Lilli Tagger excels, securing 48.75% of points on opponents' second serves, compared to Cocciaretto's 45.44%.
- For first serve returns, both players perform similarly, with Cocciaretto at 32.30% and Tagger at 33.36%.
- Under pressure, Cocciaretto has saved a higher percentage of breakpoints at 47.56% over recent months, while Tagger stands at 43.04%.
- Does the overall match win percentage favor one player? Yes, Tagger's win rate of 75.00% over the last year significantly surpasses Cocciaretto's 52.54%.
- Both players are strongest on clay, winning 66% of their matches on this surface.
- While Cocciaretto competes mostly on the Main tour, winning 53.85% of her matches, Tagger dominates the Challenger/ITF circuits with an 81.58% win rate.
- Comparing opponents' average ranks, Cocciaretto faces tougher competition with an average rank of 132.49, in contrast to Tagger's 300.9.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Tagger holds a significant advantage, having won 73% in these scenarios compared to Cocciaretto's 53%.
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
In recent months, Elisabetta Cocciaretto demonstrates consistent second serve performance and effective breakpoint savings. Her experience in the Main tour provides her with exposure to high-level competition.
Lilli Tagger's superior return game, particularly against second serves, along with her strong deciding set record, poses a considerable challenge. Her impressive win rate on the Challenger/ITF circuit highlights her current form.
While both players share proficiency on clay, Cocciaretto's outcomes against higher-ranked players suggest resilience. However, the deciding set advantage and overall win percentage suggest Lilli Tagger as the likely victor in this matchup.
Lilli Tagger vs Elisabetta Cocciaretto Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
L. Tagger vs E. Cocciaretto H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 6 |
| 3 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:37:53 | Average Match Time | 1:37:53 |
| 63% (36/57) | 1st Serve % | 66% (46/70) |
| 75% (27/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 50% (23/46) |
| 38% (8/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 67% (2/3) |
| 53% (37/70) | Return Points Win % | 39% (22/57) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
L. Tagger Recent Matches Played
E. Cocciaretto Recent Matches Played

L. Tagger vs E. Cocciaretto Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.67% (60/30) | YTD Win/Loss | 60.61% (220/143) |
| 63.37% (128/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 58.17% (484/348) |
| 54.79% (1000/825) | Games Win/Loss | 53.08% (4138/3658) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Hard Win/Loss | 51.72% (60/56) |
| 70.31% (45/19) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.00% (132/68) |
| 50.00% (3/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 55.56% (15/12) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 65.00% (13/7) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 144 | Aces Total | 394 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 235 | Total Double Faults | 1091 |
| 1:32:33 | Average Match Time | 1:41:16 |
| 317.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 334.97 |
| 64% (3301/5122) | 1st Serve % | 66% (16431/24898) |
| 62% (2058/3301) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (9888/16431) |
| 49% (886/1821) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3985/8467) |
| 48% (307/633) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (1545/3169) |
| 46% (2333/5087) | Return Points Win % | 47% (11536/24753) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 57.45% (27/20) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 35.56% (16/29) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 66.67% (4/2) | Main Tour W/L | 53.47% (54/47) |
| 69.84% (44/19) | Challenger W/L | 74.66% (109/37) |
| 60.00% (12/8) | Futures W/L | 58.33% (7/5) |
| 66% (59/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 61% (220/363) |
| 60% (9/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 60% (53/88) |
| 61% (14/23) | Deciding Set Win % | 58% (62/106) |
| 92% (59/54) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (205/179) |
| 8% (59/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (205/26) |
| 19% (31/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 26% (158/41) |