Lloyd Glasspool vs Sem Verbeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Glasspool vs Verbeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Lloyd Glasspool vs Sem Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Glasspool has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Verbeek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Glasspool, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Glasspool has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbeek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Glasspool has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Verbeek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Glasspool has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 71% (W/L 17/ 7), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 40% (W/L 14/ 21). Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Glasspool winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Glasspool winning 2 and Verbeek winning 0. The last match between Glasspool and Verbeek was at the Lexington Challenger, 01-08-2019, Third, Hard with Lloyd Glasspool getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:12:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Glasspool and Verbeek have played a deciding set 0 times, with Glasspool winning 0 times and Verbeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Glasspool winning 0, and Verbeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Glasspool has played against opponents with an average rank of while Verbeek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Glasspool has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbeek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Glasspool has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbeek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Glasspool 1 - 0 Verbeek
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Ret.
Rank
282
High
30
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
531
High
29
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
59% (194-134)
Career Total W/L
57% (104-78)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$19,500
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Lloyd Glasspool | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 7 |
Aces (Total) | 4 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:12:30 | 1:12:30 |
1st Serve % | 55% (30/55) | 67% (30/45) |
1st Serve Win% | 77% (23/30) | 70% (21/30) |
2nd Serve Win% | 68% (17/25) | 47% (7/15) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 100% (3/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Return Points W% | 38% (17/45) | 27% (15/55) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Sem Verbeek
55%
(
30 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Lloyd Glasspool | Sem Verbeek |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Lloyd Glasspool Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-6(0) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-7(4) 10-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 3-6 6-4 10-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 7-5 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Ji Sung Nam
Player
Lloyd Glasspool
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
6
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
29 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lloyd Glasspool
Player
Cannon Kingsley
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
81)
14
Aces
12
2
Double Faults
0
89%
(
34 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
81)
75
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H |
view more