Louisa Chirico vs Fiona Crawley Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does Fiona Crawley fare on her second serve performance compared to Louisa Chirico? Crawley holds a slight edge, securing 39.93% of points, while Chirico is at 38.65%.
• In recent return game stats, Crawley also has the upper hand, winning 52.51% of opponents' second serve points versus Chirico's 51.29%.
• Both players exhibit comparable performance on first serve returns, with Crawley at 34.40% and Chirico narrowly ahead at 34.88%.
• Under pressure, Chirico slightly outperforms Crawley by saving 48.69% of breakpoints against Crawley's 47.05%.
• Overall match performance over the past year favors Crawley, who has won 67.24% of her matches, compared to Chirico's 53.03%.
• Analyzing career surface strengths, Crawley performs best on Hard courts with a 71% win rate, whereas Chirico excels on Clay with the same percentage.
• The head-to-head record is entirely in Crawley's favor, having won their only match, with a set score of 2-0.
• Fiona Crawley has contended against opponents with an average ranking of 351.52 over the past year, while Chirico faced higher-ranked opponents averaging 265.33.
• In deciding sets over the last year, Crawley boasts a 60% success rate, while Chirico stands at 50%.

Editorial Prediction (October 30, 2025, UTC):

Fiona Crawley has demonstrated notable consistency and success on Hard courts, aligning with the upcoming match surface. Her advantage in head-to-head encounters and superior overall match performance over the past year further strengthens her position.

Although Louisa Chirico competes against higher-ranked opponents, suggesting resilience, Crawley's edge in decisive match stats and past victory suggests she's more reliably effective. Moreover, Crawley’s slight edge in both second serve performance and return game statistics suggests a likely advantage.

Given these insights, Fiona Crawley is the probable winner for the upcoming match against Louisa Chirico, based on current performance data and historical head-to-head results.