Luca Staeheli vs Adrian Bodmer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Staeheli vs Bodmer analysis and find out who is favored!
Luca Staeheli vs Adrian Bodmer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Staeheli has won 44.83% of points on his second serve, while Bodmer has won 57.39%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Staeheli, in recent form, has won 53.85% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bodmer has won 59.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.33% and 35.71% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Staeheli has saved 54.55% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bodmer has saved 55.26% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Staeheli has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 10/ 8), with Bodmer winning 85.71% (W/L 12/ 2) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Staeheli has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 11/ 8), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 55% (W/L 31/ 25). Bodmer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 110/ 52), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 40% (W/L 8/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Staeheli has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.82% of matches (W/L 10/ 7), where as Bodmer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 12/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Staeheli winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Staeheli winning 2 and Bodmer winning 0. The last match between Staeheli and Bodmer was at the M15 Horgen, 29-08-2019, Second, Clay with Luca Staeheli getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Staeheli and Bodmer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Staeheli winning 0 times and Bodmer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Staeheli winning 1, and Bodmer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Staeheli has played against opponents with an average rank of 66.22 while Bodmer has played against players with an average rank of 64.07.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Staeheli has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bodmer has won 75% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Staeheli has converted 45.45% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bodmer has converted 55.38% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Staeheli 1 - 0 Bodmer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
644
Rank
455
High
29
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
55% (60-50)
Career Total W/L
60% (211-140)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
100% (7-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,195
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Luca Staeheli | Adrian Bodmer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 3 |
DFs (Total) | 4 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:44:0 | 1:44:0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (44/69) | 59% (44/75) |
1st Serve Win% | 61% (27/44) | 61% (27/44) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (10/25) | 35% (11/31) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (6/10) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Points W% | 49% (37/75) | 46% (32/69) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(7) 6-3 |
Luca Staeheli
Player
Adrian Bodmer
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
3
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
46%
(
32 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
37 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Luca Staeheli | Adrian Bodmer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 88% (14/2) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (94/46) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
Aces Total | 0 | 8 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.03 |
DFs Total | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | 1:10:42 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 78 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (211/313) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (139/211) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 67% (68/102) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 61% (25/41) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 48% (167/350) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (7/7) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (5/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
Luca Staeheli Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Garrett Johns
Player
Luca Staeheli
56%
(
32 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
19 of
28)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Luca Staeheli
Player
Matthew Thomson
45%
(
27 of
60)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Luca Staeheli
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
5
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
7
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
48%
(
40 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
77
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 1-6 6-2 10-6 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Mika Brunold
Player
Luca Staeheli
57%
(
70 of
123)
1st Serve %
58%
(
67 of
115)
2
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
3
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
38 of
67)
42%
(
22 of
53)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
21 of
48)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
46%
(
56 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
56 of
115)
123
Total Points Won
115
|
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Adrian Bodmer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
F |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Jacob Bradshaw
69%
(
47 of
68)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
SF |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Drew Van Orderlain
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
QF |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Alexandros Skorilas
81%
(
72 of
89)
1st Serve %
68%
(
52 of
77)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
8
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
52%
(
46 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
82
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Oleg Prihodko
57%
(
43 of
76)
1st Serve %
55%
(
50 of
91)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
6
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
91)
92
Total Points Won
75
|
5-7 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Evangelos Kypriotis
46%
(
17 of
37)
1st Serve %
43%
(
20 of
47)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
88%
(
15 of
17)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
85%
(
17 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 6-0 | H2H | |||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF | w/o | H2H |
view more