Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Lucas Miedler vs Hazem Naow Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Miedler vs Naow analysis and find out who is favored!
Lucas Miedler vs Hazem Naow Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Miedler has won 44.78% of points on his second serve, while Naow has won 50.79%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Miedler, in recent form, has won 51.79% of his opponent's second serve points, while Naow has won 56.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.87% and 34.36% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Miedler has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Naow has saved 61.98% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Miedler has won 42.86% of matches played (W/L 3/ 4), with Naow winning 68.29% (W/L 56/ 26) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Miedler has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 181/ 76), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Naow has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 71% (W/L 65/ 27), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 60% (W/L 54/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Miedler has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 1/ 2), where as Naow has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 70.91% of matches (W/L 39/ 16). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Miedler winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Miedler winning 2 and Naow winning 0. The last match between Miedler and Naow was at the M15 Heraklion, 25-11-2020, First, Hard with Lucas Miedler getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Miedler and Naow have played a deciding set 0 times, with Miedler winning 0 times and Naow 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Miedler winning 0, and Naow 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Miedler has played against opponents with an average rank of 291.86 while Naow has played against players with an average rank of 181.83.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Miedler has won 60% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Naow has won 62% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Miedler has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Naow has converted 44.85% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Miedler 1 - 0 Naow
899
Rank
201
High
27
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
341
Rank
323
High
24
Age
Plays
L
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
L
60% (338-226)
Career Total W/L
66% (151-78)
67% (2-1)
YTD W/L
76% (26-8)
$43,270
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Lucas Miedler | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 5 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:0 | 1:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 52% (30/58) | 73% (49/67) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 73% (22/30) | 55% (27/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 33% (6/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 83% (5/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 51% (34/67) | 33% (19/58) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-0 |
Stats 
Lucas Miedler
Player
Hazem Naow
52%
(
30 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
49 of
67)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
52
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Lucas Miedler | Hazem Naow |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 67% (2/1) | 76% (26/8) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 70% (54/23) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (46/48) | 57% (407/308) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (1/1) | 78% (7/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (1/0) | 76% (19/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.26 | 0.21 |
| Aces Total | 12 | 75 |
| DFs per game | 0.09 | 0.35 |
| DFs Total | 4 | 123 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:52 | 1:38:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 123.67 | 229.18 |
| 1st Serve % | 65% (122/189) | 63% (1484/2347) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (85/122) | 70% (1043/1484) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (30/67) | 50% (429/863) |
| BPs Won% Total | 38% (5/13) | 44% (119/273) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (63/178) | 43% (999/2323) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 100% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 78% (14/4) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 80% (12/3) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 76% (26/34) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 78% (7/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 50% (2/1) | 100% (22/22) |
| 1st set W, L | 50% (2/1) | 0% (22/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 33% (12/4) |
Lucas Miedler Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fabio Fognini
Player
Lucas Miedler
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
53 of
81)
5
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
0
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
34 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
77
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
69 of
108)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
94)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
72%
(
50 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
50 of
69)
46%
(
18 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
37%
(
40 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
94)
101
Total Points Won
101
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| Rubber 4 | 6-3 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
67 of
108)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
9
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
0
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
33%
(
36 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
22 of
76)
94
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Miedler
Player
Neil Oberleitner
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
54%
(
47 of
87)
9
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
59%
(
24 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
27 of
87)
91
Total Points Won
90
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Lucas Miedler
62%
(
46 of
74)
1st Serve %
46%
(
36 of
78)
19
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
26 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Barrientos
Player
Lucas Miedler
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve %
39%
(
15 of
38)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Lucas Miedler
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
4
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jeff Wolf
Player
Lucas Miedler
66%
(
50 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
10
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
4
82%
(
41 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
31 of
86)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Luca Van Assche
Player
Lucas Miedler
58%
(
64 of
111)
1st Serve %
68%
(
66 of
97)
14
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
47 of
66)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
8 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
40%
(
44 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
109
Total Points Won
99
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Hazem Naow Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Hazem Naow
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
24 of
41)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Hazem Naow
66%
(
66 of
100)
1st Serve %
67%
(
51 of
76)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
37 of
51)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
76)
89
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Mae Malige
66%
(
31 of
47)
1st Serve %
36%
(
15 of
42)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
58
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Dario Huber
63%
(
64 of
102)
1st Serve %
56%
(
53 of
95)
3
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
14 of
42)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
91
|
4-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Gregoire Barrere
Player
Hazem Naow
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve %
74%
(
32 of
43)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
18 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
50
Total Points Won
42
|
7-5 2-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
41 of
55)
4
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
30 of
41)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
0
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
32 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lucas Pouille
Player
Hazem Naow
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
64%
(
34 of
53)
13
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
94%
(
29 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hazem Naow
Player
Arthur Rinderknech
55%
(
72 of
130)
1st Serve %
72%
(
73 of
102)
4
Aces
16
6
Double Faults
0
72%
(
52 of
72)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
49 of
73)
53%
(
31 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
12)
36%
(
47 of
130)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
37 of
102)
120
Total Points Won
112
|
7-6(2) 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Miedler Vs Naow Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
