Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen vs Daniel Michalski Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lilleengen vs Michalski analysis and find out who is favored!
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen vs Daniel Michalski Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lilleengen has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Michalski has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lilleengen, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Michalski has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lilleengen has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Michalski has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lilleengen has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Michalski winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lilleengen has played against opponents with an average rank of while Michalski has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lilleengen has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Michalski has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lilleengen has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Michalski has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lilleengen 0 - 0 Michalski
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
R
Plays
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Lilleengen VS Michalski H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Lukas HELLUM Lilleengen Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Osgar O'Hoisin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 7-6(3) 2-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Pietro Orlando Fellin
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
68%
(
50 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
35 of
59)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Caspar Schuetze
55%
(
26 of
47)
1st Serve %
65%
(
31 of
48)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
13 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alex Knaff
Player
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
62%
(
36 of
58)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Lukas Hellum Lilleengen
Player
Jack Loge
64%
(
58 of
90)
1st Serve %
57%
(
35 of
61)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
41%
(
13 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
42 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
78
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 6-3 10-2 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Michalski Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Marcello Serafini
Player
Daniel Michalski
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
73%
(
63 of
86)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
50%
(
15 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
37 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
85
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luigi Sorrentino
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
25 of
48)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
6
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
6 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Dax Donders
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
65%
(
20 of
31)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Daniel Michalski
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
92)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
63%
(
33 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
44%
(
37 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
91
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Michele Ribecai
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
64%
(
47 of
73)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
39%
(
28 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Luca Parenti
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
32 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
14 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
22 of
54)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Pietro Marino
57%
(
65 of
115)
1st Serve %
56%
(
68 of
121)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
58%
(
38 of
65)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
44%
(
22 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
57%
(
8 of
14)
48%
(
55 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
58 of
121)
118
Total Points Won
118
|
7-6(4) 3-6 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zsombor Piros
Player
Daniel Michalski
56%
(
37 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
44 of
75)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
22 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
78
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(0) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Francesco Maestrelli
Player
Daniel Michalski
55%
(
31 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
1
87%
(
27 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniel Michalski
Player
Cezar Cretu
43%
(
26 of
61)
1st Serve %
80%
(
39 of
49)
0
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
0
54%
(
14 of
26)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
57%
(
20 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
44%
(
27 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more