Maelle Leclercq vs Theo Gravouil Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 Jun at 02:04 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Leclercq vs T. Gravouil

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Leclercq 1 - 0 Gravouil
They have played 2 sets in total, with Maelle Leclercq winning 2 and Theo Gravouil winning 0. The last match between Maelle Leclercq and Theo Gravouil was at the W15 Norges-la-Ville, 11-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Maelle Leclercq getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Leclercq | 1 |
| Gravouil | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) W15 Norges-la-Ville(06-11-25)
M. Leclercq vs T. Gravouil H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.93% (66-52) | Career Total W/L | 55.77% (116-92) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Leclercq vs T. Gravouil Match Preview:
- Second serve performance is crucial, and Leclercq has been much stronger recently, winning 40.78% of points compared to Gravouil, who has won none.
- Leclercq's return game is significantly better, with 55.43% of opponent's second serve points won versus Gravouil's 0% record. How critical is this for determining the winner? Very crucial, as it often dictates match success.
- Handling pressure is vital, and Leclercq excels, saving 42.16% of breakpoints whereas Gravouil struggles with 0% saved.
- In the last year, Leclercq has a match win rate of 66.67%, clearly outperforming Gravouil, who has yet to secure any victories with a 0% win rate.
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces, with Leclercq winning 69% and Gravouil 64% of their matches. Who has the edge? Leclercq, given the overall performance.
- Leclercq has competed against stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 293.64 compared to Gravouil's 800, suggesting Leclercq is more battle-tested.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Leclercq shows resilience, winning 60% of such sets, unlike Gravouil, who has yet to clinch a deciding set victory.
- Leclercq has a more efficient break point conversion rate at 47.22%, while Gravouil has not converted any, indicating Leclercq's ability to capitalize on opportunities.
Editorial Prediction (June 11, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match seems to strongly favor Leclercq, as reflected through a myriad of performance statistics. From second serve success to return points, Leclercq displays marked superiority over Gravouil, who hasn't shown recent form or resilience.
Under pressure, Leclercq's capability to save crucial breakpoints and convert them into opportunities positions them ahead. Their experience in playing against higher-ranked opponents adds to their competitive edge.
While both players show proficiency on hard surfaces, Leclercq's overall gameplay across various scenarios and surfaces exhibits a stronger track record.
Considering all factors, Leclercq is the clear favorite to win the upcoming match, given their consistent and robust performance metrics compared to Gravouil.
Maelle Leclercq vs Theo Gravouil Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Leclercq vs T. Gravouil H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 4 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 5 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 1:1:45 | Average Match Time | 1:1:45 |
| 58% (29/50) | 1st Serve % | 44% (20/45) |
| 83% (24/29) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (13/20) |
| 48% (10/21) | 2nd Serve Win % | 28% (7/25) |
| 71% (5/7) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (1/3) |
| 56% (25/45) | Return Points Win % | 32% (16/50) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Leclercq Recent Matches Played
T. Gravouil Recent Matches Played

M. Leclercq vs T. Gravouil Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.93% (66/52) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.77% (116/92) |
| 54.02% (141/120) | Sets Win/Loss | 54.29% (253/213) |
| 52.51% (1257/1137) | Games Win/Loss | 52.08% (2233/2055) |
| 65.38% (34/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.74% (58/33) |
| 51.92% (27/25) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.12% (28/29) |
| 35.71% (5/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 50.00% (30/30) |
| 0.16 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
| 191 | Aces Total | 243 |
| 0.42 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.15 |
| 495 | Total Double Faults | 315 |
| 1:15:30 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 345.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 551.13 |
| 59% (3576/6063) | 1st Serve % | 60% (4310/7232) |
| 63% (2255/3576) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (2762/4310) |
| 41% (1026/2487) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (1348/2921) |
| 48% (371/768) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 46% (381/826) |
| 46% (2837/6139) | Return Points Win % | 43% (3124/7243) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Challenger W/L | 42.37% (25/34) |
| 61.54% (56/35) | Futures W/L | 61.07% (91/58) |
| 56% (65/116) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 56% (116/207) |
| 53% (8/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (23/50) |
| 63% (17/27) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (30/51) |
| 92% (63/58) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (114/102) |
| 8% (63/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (114/12) |
| 15% (55/8) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (94/14) |