Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Conor Brady Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Oct at 04:55 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sharipov (RUS) vs C. Brady
.jpg)
RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: (RUS) 1 - 0 Brady
They have played 3 sets in total, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) winning 2 and Conor Brady winning 1. The last match between Marat Sharipov (RUS) and Conor Brady was at the M25 Glasgow, 28-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) getting the victory 6-2 4-6 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| (RUS) | 1 |
| Brady | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Glasgow(10-28-25)
M. S. (RUS) vs C. Brady H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.08% (189-97) | Career Total W/L | 40.00% (6-9) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. S. (RUS) vs C. Brady Match Preview:
- Conor Brady has a second serve win rate of 43.02% over the last 6 months, whereas Marat Sharipov slightly edges him with 43.58%.
- In terms of return game effectiveness, Marat Sharipov significantly excels by winning 47.30% of opponents' second serve points, compared to Brady's 38.52%.
- Conversely, Brady outperforms Sharipov in first serve returns with 37.95% success compared to Sharipov's 24.28%.
- Under pressure, Brady has saved 56.16% of breakpoints, surpassing Sharipov's 53.40% save rate. Could this be a deciding factor?
- Over the past year, Marat Sharipov has a higher match win percentage of 64.00%, contrasting with Brady's 45.45%.
- Both players perform best on hard courts, each boasting a 50% win rate, but Sharipov's stronger performance on indoor hard surfaces at 58% suggests more adaptability.
- Brady primarily competes at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, whereas Sharipov operates at Challengers/ITF > $10K, winning 60% of his matches there, indicating a higher level of competition experience.
- In the past year, Brady faced stronger opponents, with an average ranking of 172.82 compared to Sharipov's 396.75 ranked adversaries.
- In deciding sets over the last year, Sharipov has a 71% success rate, slightly higher than Brady's 67%.
- Historical player performance informs future outcomes, but how might current form and event-specific trends impact predictions?
Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):
Evaluating the players' recent stats reveals a fascinating match-up. Both Conor Brady and Marat Sharipov show strengths and weaknesses in different areas.
Marat Sharipov's notable advantage in return games and a higher win rate indicates his capability to handle pressure against varying opponents. However, Conor Brady's effectiveness at saving breakpoints and competing against stronger opponents could bring unexpected challenges for Sharipov.
The experience level in higher-tier tournaments favors Sharipov, providing him with a slight edge in this context.
Taking all these factors into account, Marat Sharipov is slightly favored to win the upcoming tennis match.
Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Conor Brady Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. S. (RUS) vs C. Brady H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 16 | Games Won | 11 |
| 12 | Aces (Total) | 2 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 2:4:25 | Average Match Time | 2:4:25 |
| 66% (56/85) | 1st Serve % | 59% (42/71) |
| 75% (42/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (28/42) |
| 48% (14/29) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (14/29) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) |
| 41% (29/71) | Return Points Win % | 34% (29/85) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. S. (RUS) Recent Matches Played
C. Brady Recent Matches Played

M. S. (RUS) vs C. Brady Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.08% (189/97) | YTD Win/Loss | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 63.20% (407/237) | Sets Win/Loss | 41.18% (14/20) |
| 55.51% (3375/2705) | Games Win/Loss | 46.08% (153/179) |
| 73.81% (93/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (5/5) |
| 60.33% (73/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.97% (23/16) | Indoor Hard W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.68 | Aces Per Game | 0.06 |
| 2016 | Aces Total | 9 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 679 | Total Double Faults | 29 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:39:20 |
| 486.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 190.93 |
| 58% (10116/17490) | 1st Serve % | 70% (601/861) |
| 75% (7607/10116) | 1st Serve Win % | 56% (339/601) |
| 51% (3763/7374) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (125/260) |
| 41% (791/1923) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (39/97) |
| 41% (7317/18018) | Return Points Win % | 42% (359/865) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.49% (31/22) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68.10% (158/74) | Futures W/L | 40.00% (6/9) |
| 67% (185/277) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 40% (6/15) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (52/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
| 60% (45/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (2/4) |
| 91% (191/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (6/6) |
| 9% (191/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (6/0) |
| 16% (95/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (9/0) |