Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Luke Hooper Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 21 Oct at 11:12 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Sharipov (RUS) vs L. Hooper
.jpg)
RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GBR
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: (RUS) 1 - 0 Hooper
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) winning 2 and Luke Hooper winning 0. The last match between Marat Sharipov (RUS) and Luke Hooper was at the M25 Sheffield, 21-10-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Marat Sharipov (RUS) getting the victory 7-6(3) 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| (RUS) | 1 |
| Hooper | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Sheffield(10-21-25)
M. S. (RUS) vs L. Hooper H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 66.32% (189-96) | Career Total W/L | 57.14% (44-33) |
| 1 | Indoor | 0 |
| 9 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. S. (RUS) vs L. Hooper Match Preview:
- Recent second serve statistics reveal that Marat Sharipov (RUS) has won 43.39% of points, outperforming Luke Hooper’s 38.46%. Could this give Sharipov an edge in the match? Yes, it suggests better performance under similar conditions.
- Examining return game performance, Marat Sharipov has secured 47.15% of his opponents’ second serve points recently, compared to Luke Hooper’s 43.75%. This indicates Sharipov's superiority in return games.
- However, in the context of returning first serves, Luke Hooper is slightly better, with a success rate of 26.48% over Sharipov's 24.18%. Could this help Hooper in key situations? Possibly, although it depends on how often first serves are in play.
- Both players exhibit comparable aptitude in saving breakpoints, with Hooper saving 54.44% and Sharipov saving 53.72%. This suggests neither has a pronounced advantage in high-pressure situations.
- Performance over the past year shows Marat Sharipov with a higher win percentage (64.38%) compared to Luke Hooper (61.82%). Does this trend suggest an overall stronger performance by Sharipov? Yes, particularly in higher-level tournaments.
- Hooper’s best surface is indoor hard courts, with a 68% win rate, while Sharipov excels on hard courts, also with a 68% win rate. The match surface could play a crucial part in determining the winner.
- Marat Sharipov often competes at higher-level events, facing an average opponent rank of 407.04, versus Hooper's 227.11 in level-related performance context. Does this experience at a higher competition level work to Sharipov’s benefit? Likely, as it demonstrates robustness against a wider pool of competition.
- In deciding sets, Sharipov has a remarkable 74% win rate over the past 12 months, overshadowing Hooper’s 44%. Should a match reach this stage, Sharipov clearly has the upper hand.
- Current event figures and individual tournament performance can also affect predictions, an area where specifics of this event could alter predictions further. This is a noteworthy consideration when selecting a favorite.
Editorial Prediction (October 21, 2025, UTC):
Looking into recent performance, Marat Sharipov’s superior second serve statistics, coupled with his effective return game, sets a compelling case for a potential victory. His record in tough, deciding sets further enhances this outlook.
Despite Luke Hooper’s proficiency on indoor hard surfaces, particularly with first serve returns, Sharipov's experience in higher-level competitions and consistent performance across critical metrics suggest he is better positioned for success.
Taking into account all of these factors, Marat Sharipov seems to be the likely winner in the upcoming match, with his strengths aligning closely to the potential challenges faced.
Marat Sharipov (RUS) vs Luke Hooper Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. S. (RUS) vs L. Hooper H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 7 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:13:19 | Average Match Time | 1:13:19 |
| 72% (39/54) | 1st Serve % | 56% (32/57) |
| 85% (33/39) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (24/32) |
| 80% (12/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (12/25) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 37% (21/57) | Return Points Win % | 17% (9/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. S. (RUS) Recent Matches Played
L. Hooper Recent Matches Played

M. S. (RUS) vs L. Hooper Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 66.32% (189/96) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.14% (44/33) |
| 63.40% (407/235) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.89% (95/72) |
| 55.56% (3367/2693) | Games Win/Loss | 53.33% (856/749) |
| 73.81% (93/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.90% (28/23) |
| 60.33% (73/48) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 60.53% (23/15) | Indoor Hard W/L | 61.54% (16/10) |
| 0.68 | Aces Per Game | 0.25 |
| 2004 | Aces Total | 195 |
| 0.23 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 677 | Total Double Faults | 185 |
| 1:28:45 | Average Match Time | 1:8:46 |
| 484.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 221.42 |
| 58% (10082/17430) | 1st Serve % | 59% (2026/3430) |
| 75% (7579/10082) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (1403/2026) |
| 51% (3753/7348) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (713/1404) |
| 41% (791/1922) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (133/339) |
| 41% (7293/17946) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1339/3428) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 58.49% (31/22) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 68.40% (158/73) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (44/33) |
| 67% (185/276) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 57% (43/76) |
| 0% (0/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 56% (52/93) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 35% (6/17) |
| 60% (45/75) | Deciding Set Win % | 43% (6/14) |
| 91% (191/174) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (47/43) |
| 9% (191/17) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (47/4) |
| 16% (94/15) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 3% (30/1) |