Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marc Lopez vs Thiemo De Bakker Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Lopez vs Bakker analysis and find out who is favored!
Marc Lopez vs Thiemo De Bakker Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Lopez has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Bakker has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Lopez, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Bakker has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Lopez has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Bakker has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Lopez has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Bakker winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Lopez has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 263/ 195), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3). Bakker has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Lopez has played against opponents with an average rank of while Bakker has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Lopez has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Bakker has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Lopez has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Bakker has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Lopez 0 - 0 Bakker
N/A
Rank
High
41
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
35
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
W
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marc Lopez | Thiemo De Bakker |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Aces pg | 0 | 1st Match |
| Aces Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs per game | 0 | 1st Match |
| DFs Total | 0 | 1st Match |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 1st Match |
Marc Lopez Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubber 4 |
Stats 
Marc Lopez
Player
Sumit Nagal
68%
(
56 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
32 of
50)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
34 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
33 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Albert Montanes
Player
Marc Lopez
72%
(
48 of
67)
1st Serve %
77%
(
57 of
74)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Lopez
Player
Jose Checa-Calvo
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-7(4) 6-2 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
| Rubber 4 |
Stats
Marc Lopez
Player
Denys Molchanov
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
34 of
64)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
30 of
64)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tommy Robredo
Player
Marc Lopez
57%
(
38 of
67)
1st Serve %
84%
(
64 of
76)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
0
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
31 of
64)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
28 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
40 of
76)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
2-6 6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Lopez
Player
Stephane Robert
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
49%
(
24 of
49)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
82%
(
9 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
10 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
29
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Lopez
Player
Andreas Haider-Maurer
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
57
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jarkko Nieminen
Player
Marc Lopez
59%
(
57 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
60 of
101)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
39 of
60)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
101)
95
Total Points Won
102
|
1-6 6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Lopez
Player
Lukas Rosol
66%
(
60 of
91)
1st Serve %
54%
(
53 of
99)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
2
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
68%
(
21 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
31 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
42 of
99)
102
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Thiemo De Bakker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Etienne Donnet
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
58%
(
46 of
79)
1st Serve %
50%
(
44 of
88)
8
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
1
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
33 of
88)
91
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(7) 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Florian Broska
58%
(
48 of
83)
1st Serve %
47%
(
40 of
86)
9
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
27 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Cyril Vandermeersch
66%
(
47 of
71)
1st Serve %
61%
(
41 of
67)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
23 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
22 of
67)
70
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Niklas Waldner
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
55%
(
38 of
69)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
32 of
38)
87%
(
20 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
11 of
31)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
9 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
4
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
3
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
36 of
49)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
30 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Oleg Prihodko
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
60%
(
57 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
58 of
95)
8
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
42 of
57)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
63%
(
24 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
31%
(
29 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
32 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
39%
(
23 of
59)
2
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
4
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Thiemo de Bakker
Player
Toby Martin
67%
(
26 of
39)
1st Serve %
49%
(
19 of
39)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
5%
(
1 of
20)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
15 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Federico Iannaccone
Player
Thiemo de Bakker
72%
(
55 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
61 of
108)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
45 of
55)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
21%
(
16 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
103
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Lopez Vs Bakker Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
