Marc Polmans vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Polmans vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Marc Polmans vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polmans has won 45.74% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polmans, in recent form, has won 52.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 52.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.77% and 25.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Polmans has saved 63.3% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Polmans has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 18/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 92/ 67), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 24), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Polmans winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Polmans winning 4 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Polmans and Ilkel was at the Yokohama Challenger, 20-11-2023, First, Hard with Marc Polmans getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:33.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Polmans and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Polmans winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Polmans winning 0, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polmans has played against opponents with an average rank of 304.71 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 253.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polmans has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Polmans has converted 39.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Polmans 2 - 0 Ilkel
13
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
10
Minor
167
Rank
116
High
26
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
56% (320-252)
Career Total W/L
57% (399-307)
33% (3-6)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$579,380
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marc Polmans | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 25 | 11 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:17:33 | 1:17:33 |
1st Serve % | 59% (59/100) | 57% (65/114) |
1st Serve Win% | 78% (46/59) | 55% (36/65) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (24/41) | 45% (22/49) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 47% (9/19) | 33% (2/6) |
Return Points W% | 49% (56/114) | 30% (30/100) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-0 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
55%
(
22 of
40)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
||||
6-3 1-6 6-1 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Cem Ilkel
58%
(
39 of
67)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
74
Total Points Won
67
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marc Polmans | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (3/6) | 47% (7/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 33% (7/14) | 42% (14/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (86/105) | 46% (136/160) |
Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.53 |
Aces Total | 39 | 76 |
DFs per game | 0.34 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 32 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:2 | 1:25:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 293.44 | 194.87 |
1st Serve % | 68% (431/630) | 58% (510/882) |
1st Serve W% | 68% (294/431) | 71% (363/510) |
2nd Serve W% | 45% (89/199) | 46% (170/372) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (15/41) | 44% (27/62) |
Return Pts W% | 35% (202/585) | 37% (318/859) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 40% (2/3) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 38% (3/8) | 43% (6/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (1/2) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (1/2) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 0% (5/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Marc Polmans
70%
(
58 of
83)
1st Serve %
73%
(
66 of
90)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
49 of
66)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
29 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Mikalai Haliak
75%
(
82 of
109)
1st Serve %
60%
(
62 of
104)
3
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
4
66%
(
54 of
82)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
35%
(
38 of
109)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
104)
110
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 4-6 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marc Polmans
Player
Makoto Ochi
77%
(
34 of
44)
1st Serve %
73%
(
32 of
44)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Alexei Popyrin
Player
Marc Polmans
72%
(
63 of
87)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
20
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
5
81%
(
51 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
51 of
77)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
21 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
113
Total Points Won
87
|
6-3 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Enzo Couacaud
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
26 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
27 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Zizou Bergs
Player
Marc Polmans
74%
(
49 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
4
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
35 of
76)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more