Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marc Polmans vs Tung-Lin Wu Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Polmans vs Wu analysis and find out who is favored!
Marc Polmans vs Tung-Lin Wu Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Polmans has won 46.94% of points on his second serve, while Wu has won 53.77%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Polmans, in recent form, has won 53.39% of his opponent's second serve points, while Wu has won 50.4%. The same stats for first serve returns are 31.38% and 29.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Polmans has saved 60.29% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Wu has saved 57.78% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Polmans has won 53.62% of matches played (W/L 37/ 32), with Wu winning 50% (W/L 28/ 28) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Polmans has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 58% (W/L 96/ 69), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 12/ 16). Wu has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 168/ 125), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Polmans has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.94% of matches (W/L 27/ 24), where as Wu has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 54.76% of matches (W/L 23/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Polmans winning 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Polmans winning 1 and Wu winning 2. The last match between Polmans and Wu was at the Istanbul 2 Challenger, 16-09-2021, Second, Hard with Tung-Lin Wu getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:9:29.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Polmans and Wu have played a deciding set 1 times, with Polmans winning 0 times and Wu 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Polmans winning 0, and Wu 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Polmans has played against opponents with an average rank of 316.8 while Wu has played against players with an average rank of 298.46.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Polmans has won 55% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Wu has won 58% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Polmans has converted 45.23% of breakpoint opportunities, and Wu has converted 39.35% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Polmans 0 - 1 Wu
176
Rank
116
High
26
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
257
Rank
158
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
56% (324-254)
Career Total W/L
55% (225-187)
47% (7-8)
YTD W/L
50% (9-9)
$579,380
Career Prize Money
$106,780
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marc Polmans | Tung-Lin Wu |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 1 | 2 |
| Games Won | 9 | 15 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 4 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:9:29 | 2:9:29 |
| 1st Serve % | 60% (53/88) | 65% (49/75) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 58% (31/53) | 73% (36/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (18/35) | 54% (14/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 20% (1/5) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (25/75) | 44% (39/88) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 3-6 6-1 |
Stats 
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Marc Polmans
65%
(
49 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
31 of
53)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marc Polmans | Tung-Lin Wu |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (7/8) | 50% (9/9) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 43% (16/21) | 48% (20/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (166/176) | 50% (212/208) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 53% (9/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.29 |
| Aces Total | 63 | 59 |
| DFs per game | 0.43 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 71 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:51:59 | 1:56:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 335.47 | 259.06 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (722/1084) | 66% (877/1336) |
| 1st Serve W% | 69% (496/722) | 67% (584/877) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (172/362) | 53% (243/459) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (39/80) | 40% (52/130) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (376/1024) | 37% (485/1296) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 55% (6/5) | 50% (6/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 75% (3/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 53% (9/17) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 25% (1/4) | 44% (4/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 67% (4/6) | 71% (5/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 88% (8/7) | 100% (7/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 13% (8/1) | 0% (7/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (7/0) | 18% (11/2) |
Marc Polmans Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Thanasi Kokkinakis
Player
Marc Polmans
60%
(
34 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
53 of
79)
8
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
13 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
79)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Calvin Hemery
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
68%
(
41 of
60)
2
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
24 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
60)
63
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 0-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Geoffrey Blancaneaux
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
74)
1
Aces
0
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
24 of
36)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
41%
(
23 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
40 of
74)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Felix Corwin
65%
(
61 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
57 of
91)
7
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
7
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Skander Mansouri
Player
Marc Polmans
57%
(
47 of
82)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
10
Aces
3
11
Double Faults
9
87%
(
41 of
47)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
38 of
58)
31%
(
11 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
38 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
88
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Tristan Schoolkate
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
44%
(
33 of
75)
8
Aces
10
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
82%
(
27 of
33)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
20 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
28 of
75)
76
Total Points Won
69
|
6-3 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
Player
Marc Polmans
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve %
62%
(
33 of
53)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
24 of
33)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Broady
Player
Marc Polmans
43%
(
22 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
20 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Marc Polmans
41%
(
20 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
33 of
64)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc Polmans
Player
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve %
66%
(
37 of
56)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Tung-Lin Wu Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Alibek Kachmazov
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
69 of
120)
4
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
44 of
65)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
45 of
69)
71%
(
22 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
31%
(
30 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
47 of
120)
113
Total Points Won
103
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
68%
(
67 of
98)
1st Serve %
63%
(
53 of
84)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
0
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
44 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
84)
87
Total Points Won
95
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Dane Sweeny
76%
(
74 of
97)
1st Serve %
56%
(
52 of
93)
3
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
45 of
74)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
35 of
52)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
93)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
26%
(
16 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Yu Hsiou Hsu
68%
(
42 of
62)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Timo Legout
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
62%
(
62 of
100)
1st Serve %
66%
(
68 of
103)
6
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
73%
(
45 of
62)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
42 of
68)
39%
(
15 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
40 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
44 of
103)
104
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 6-7(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Cash Hanzlik
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
88%
(
21 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Ezekiel Clark
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
4
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
0
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tung-Lin Wu
Player
Jacob Brumm
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
24 of
50)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
16 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Philip Sekulic
Player
Tung-Lin Wu
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
5
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
23 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Polmans Vs Wu Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Tung-Lin Wu
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
