Marc-Andrea Huesler vs Sho Katayama Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Nov at 05:11 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Huesler vs S. Katayama

SUI
1
Win
Played
0
Win

JPN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Huesler 1 - 0 Katayama
They have played 2 sets in total, with Marc-Andrea Huesler winning 2 and Sho Katayama winning 0. The last match between Marc-Andrea Huesler and Sho Katayama was at the Matsuyama Challenger, 03-11-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Marc-Andrea Huesler getting the victory 6-4 7-6(6).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Huesler | 1 |
| Katayama | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Matsuyama Challenger(11-03-25)
M. Huesler vs S. Katayama H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $575,365 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 53.55% (324-281) | Career Total W/L | 55.52% (171-137) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 10 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0.00% (0-2) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Huesler vs S. Katayama Match Preview:
- Recent second serve success is higher for Marc-Andrea Huesler, who wins 48.39% of points, compared to Sho Katayama's 38.46%.
- Can a player's return game influence match outcomes? Marc-Andrea Huesler has a slight edge, winning 45.10% of opponents' second serve points versus Sho Katayama's 43.45%.
- In first serve returns, Sho Katayama has a notable advantage, securing 29.86% of return points compared to Marc-Andrea Huesler's 22.02%.
- Marc-Andrea Huesler shows resilience under pressure, saving 62.61% of breakpoints compared to Sho Katayama's 34.55%.
- With historical performance in mind, Huesler has won 47.92% of matches over the past year, while Katayama boasts a higher win rate of 69.23%.
- Analyzing surface preferences, both players excel on different surfaces with Huesler's best win rate on Hard at 56% and Katayama on Clay at 56%.
- In terms of opponent quality, Huesler's competitors have an average rank of 222.27, thus indicating a potentially higher level of competition than Katayama's opponents with an average rank of 354.69.
- For deciding set performance, Katayama shines with a 100% win rate over the last year, whereas Huesler wins in 35% of such scenarios.
Editorial Prediction (November 3, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming tennis match, it is crucial to consider the players' recent performance trends, strengths, and competitive environments. Marc-Andrea Huesler demonstrates a strong second serve game and solid performance in pressure situations, particularly in saving breakpoints.
Sho Katayama, on the other hand, has a superior overall win rate over the past year and excels at returning first serves. Katayama’s exceptional record in deciding sets could also be pivotal in a closely contested match.
While Huesler has faced tougher opponents and has more experience on the Challenger/ITF circuit, Katayama's consistent results and strong performance in high-pressure moments might give him a slight edge. Considering these factors, Sho Katayama is most likely to win this upcoming tennis match.
Marc-Andrea Huesler vs Sho Katayama Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Huesler vs S. Katayama H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 18 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
| 1:36:9 | Average Match Time | 1:36:9 |
| 73% (48/66) | 1st Serve % | 67% (49/73) |
| 79% (38/48) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 72% (13/18) | 2nd Serve Win % | 67% (16/24) |
| 25% (1/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/1) |
| 33% (24/73) | Return Points Win % | 23% (15/66) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Huesler Recent Matches Played
S. Katayama Recent Matches Played

M. Huesler vs S. Katayama Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 53.55% (324/281) | YTD Win/Loss | 55.52% (171/137) |
| 53.35% (773/676) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.34% (378/305) |
| 51.38% (7336/6941) | Games Win/Loss | 52.98% (3329/2955) |
| 55.98% (103/81) | Hard Win/Loss | 55.36% (124/100) |
| 52.71% (107/96) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.87% (14/9) |
| 52.75% (96/86) | Indoor Hard W/L | 54.10% (33/28) |
| 50.00% (18/18) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.56 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 3910 | Aces Total | 211 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.08 |
| 1464 | Total Double Faults | 239 |
| 1:24:58 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 411.2 | Average Opponent Rank | 566.34 |
| 58% (21874/37521) | 1st Serve % | 68% (6552/9590) |
| 75% (16305/21874) | 1st Serve Win % | 64% (4177/6552) |
| 52% (8195/15647) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (1669/3038) |
| 39% (1198/3060) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (492/1024) |
| 36% (13745/38228) | Return Points Win % | 42% (4068/9776) |
| 31.03% (9/20) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 41.67% (5/7) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 49.55% (55/56) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 57.55% (141/104) | Challenger W/L | 48.98% (24/25) |
| 56.61% (107/82) | Futures W/L | 56.76% (147/112) |
| 54% (320/591) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 55% (170/307) |
| 18% (2/11) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 52% (135/260) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (27/64) |
| 48% (107/224) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (30/66) |
| 79% (344/272) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (166/152) |
| 21% (344/72) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (166/14) |
| 20% (261/53) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (142/19) |