Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vera vs Ficovich analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera vs Juan Pablo Ficovich Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vera has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Ficovich has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vera, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ficovich has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vera has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ficovich has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vera has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ficovich winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vera has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ficovich has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vera has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ficovich has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vera has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ficovich has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vera 0 - 0 Ficovich
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
27
Age
R
Plays
12
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Marcelo Tomas Barrios Vera Recent Matches Played
No Past Matches Available
Juan Pablo Ficovich Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Denis Kudla
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
53%
(
25 of
47)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
4
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
12 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Tristan Boyer
Player
Juan Pablo Ficovich
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
73
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
SF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
98)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
36 of
61)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
46 of
98)
96
Total Points Won
90
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Stefan Kozlov
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
37 of
59)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Gerard Campana Lee
43%
(
20 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
28 of
43)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
6
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
14 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
56
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Emiliano Aguilera
59%
(
24 of
41)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
7 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
F |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Dmitry Popko
66%
(
81 of
123)
1st Serve %
59%
(
56 of
95)
4
Aces
15
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
56 of
81)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
41 of
56)
62%
(
26 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
33%
(
41 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
95)
112
Total Points Won
106
|
6-4 6-7(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
SF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Eduardo Ribeiro
74%
(
50 of
68)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
6
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(9) 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Daniel Dutra Da Silva
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Pablo Ficovich
Player
Harrison Adams
68%
(
53 of
78)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
5
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
28 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
79
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more