Marco De Rossi vs Leopold Zima Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rossi vs Zima analysis and find out who is favored!
Marco De Rossi vs Leopold Zima Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rossi has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Zima has won 42.47%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rossi, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Zima has won 46.37%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 27.57% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rossi has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Zima has saved 57.69% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rossi has won 33.33% of matches played (W/L 5/ 10), with Zima winning 55.1% (W/L 27/ 22) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rossi has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 13/ 11), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 45% (W/L 66/ 81). Zima has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 53/ 33), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 51% (W/L 55/ 52).
- Player level: In the last year, Rossi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 35.71% of matches (W/L 5/ 9), where as Zima has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.25% of matches (W/L 27/ 21). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Rossi winning 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Rossi winning 3 and Zima winning 3. The last match between Rossi and Zima was at the M25 Cattolica, 20-06-2023, First, Clay with Leopold Zima getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:2:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rossi and Zima have played a deciding set 2 times, with Rossi winning 1 times and Zima 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Rossi winning 1, and Zima 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rossi has played against opponents with an average rank of 119.07 while Zima has played against players with an average rank of 143.57.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rossi has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Zima has won 60% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rossi has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Zima has converted 48.86% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Rossi 1 - 1 Zima
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
895
Rank
774
High
23
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
47% (106-118)
Career Total W/L
56% (152-120)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
71% (12-5)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marco De Rossi | Leopold Zima |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 3 | 3 |
Games Won | 31 | 36 |
Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 11 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:2:30 | 1:2:30 |
1st Serve % | 56% (56/100) | 50% (38/76) |
1st Serve Win% | 66% (37/56) | 82% (31/38) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (20/44) | 58% (22/38) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 25% (4/16) |
Return Points W% | 30% (23/76) | 43% (43/100) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 4-6 6-2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Marco De Rossi
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
56 of
100)
7
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
11
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
20 of
44)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
43 of
100)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
||||
7-6(9) 3-6 10-8 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marco De Rossi | Leopold Zima |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 62% (24/15) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (204/180) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 71% (5/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 70% (7/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.31 |
Aces Total | 0 | 59 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.1 |
DFs Total | 0 | 18 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 180.41 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 70% (466/668) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (333/466) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 41% (83/202) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 39% (19/49) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 34% (214/629) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 71% (12/17) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (5/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (11/11) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (11/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 17% (6/1) |
Marco De Rossi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Francesco Forti
Player
Marco De Rossi
48%
(
58 of
121)
1st Serve %
52%
(
59 of
114)
9
Aces
10
10
Double Faults
11
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
46 of
59)
56%
(
35 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
26 of
55)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
42 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
42 of
114)
121
Total Points Won
114
|
6-7(3) 7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Marco De Rossi
Player
Emanuele Bastia
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
48 of
71)
2
Aces
2
10
Double Faults
3
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
34%
(
12 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marco De Rossi
Player
Riccardo Mascarini
63%
(
35 of
56)
1st Serve %
55%
(
32 of
58)
6
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
4
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
43%
(
9 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
18 of
26)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Edoardo Lavagno
Player
Marco De Rossi
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
20 of
31)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-2 4-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Luigi Sorrentino
Player
Marco De Rossi
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve %
62%
(
24 of
39)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
55
Total Points Won
31
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marco De Rossi
Player
Daniele Minighini
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
3
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
28 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Leopold Zima Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Leopold Zima
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
30 of
45)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
56
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(6) 6-3 | H2H | |||
QF |
Leopold Zima
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
63 of
104)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
11
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
6
75%
(
47 of
63)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
30 of
43)
44%
(
18 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
27 of
77)
92
Total Points Won
89
|
7-5 6-7(7) 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-2 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Florian Broska
Player
Leopold Zima
55%
(
38 of
69)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
71%
(
27 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF | 6-3 6-7(3) 10-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Leopold Zima
Player
Mischa Lanz
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
1
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
66
Total Points Won
59
|
2-6 6-2 10-5 | H2H |
view more