Marcus Mansson vs Thomas Servien Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Mansson vs Servien analysis and find out who is favored!
Marcus Mansson vs Thomas Servien Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mansson has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Servien has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mansson, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Servien has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Mansson has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Servien has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Mansson has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Servien winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Mansson has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 32/ 31), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 25% (W/L 2/ 6). Servien has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 50% (W/L 3/ 3), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 28% (W/L 8/ 21).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Mansson winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Mansson winning 2 and Servien winning 1. The last match between Mansson and Servien was at the France F20 (Plaisir), 18-09-2017, Q1 round, I.hard with Marcus Mansson getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Mansson and Servien have played a deciding set 1 times, with Mansson winning 1 times and Servien 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Mansson winning 1, and Servien 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mansson has played against opponents with an average rank of while Servien has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mansson has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Servien has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Mansson has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Servien has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Mansson 1 - 0 Servien
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
L
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (71-91)
Career Total W/L
36% (22-39)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marcus Mansson | Thomas Servien |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 3-6 7-6(4) |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marcus Mansson | Thomas Servien |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Marcus Mansson Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q2 |
Jan Zielinski
Player
Marcus Mansson
70%
(
46 of
66)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
12
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
5
85%
(
39 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
37 of
90)
86
Total Points Won
70
|
6-7(3) 6-4 10-8 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 4-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Yannik Steinegger
Player
Marcus Mansson
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
6
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
19 of
24)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
13 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
21%
(
11 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
14 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF | 2-6 7-6(2) 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-4 7-5 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Almir Nokic
Player
Marcus Mansson
69%
(
37 of
54)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
26%
(
14 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
22 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kevin Chahoud
Player
Marcus Mansson
57%
(
8 of
14)
1st Serve %
54%
(
13 of
24)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
7 of
8)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
83%
(
5 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
2 of
14)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25
Total Points Won
13
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joffrey De Schepper
Player
Marcus Mansson
60%
(
21 of
35)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
90%
(
19 of
21)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
93%
(
13 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
9%
(
3 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Bart Stevens
Player
Marcus Mansson
48%
(
39 of
82)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
85)
5
Aces
11
4
Double Faults
4
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
67%
(
29 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
29 of
85)
87
Total Points Won
80
|
7-6(5) 7-6(3) | H2H |
view more
Thomas Servien Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Mayeul Darras
Player
Thomas Servien
64%
(
44 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
33 of
49)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
38%
(
26 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
66
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Karlo Cubelic
Player
Thomas Servien
56%
(
47 of
84)
1st Serve %
76%
(
52 of
68)
7
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
37 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
49%
(
18 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
11 of
16)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
35%
(
29 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
80
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Servien
Player
Yannis Zekri
63%
(
17 of
27)
1st Serve %
43%
(
18 of
42)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
100%
(
17 of
17)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
3 of
27)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Servien
Player
Ramy Ezat
67%
(
16 of
24)
1st Serve %
52%
(
14 of
27)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve Won
7%
(
1 of
14)
100%
(
8 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
24)
Rtn Points Won
89%
(
24 of
27)
48
Total Points Won
3
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Lucas Bouquet
Player
Thomas Servien
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
5
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
32%
(
20 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maxence Bertimon
Player
Thomas Servien
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
28 of
53)
6
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
7
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
20 of
28)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
24 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Luka Pavlovic
Player
Thomas Servien
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
13 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
46
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 2-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-2 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H |
view more