Marek Gengel vs Daniele Capecchi Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gengel vs Capecchi analysis and find out who is favored!
Marek Gengel vs Daniele Capecchi Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gengel has won 53.64% of points on his second serve, while Capecchi has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gengel, in recent form, has won 55.32% of his opponent's second serve points, while Capecchi has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gengel has saved 62.8% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Capecchi has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gengel has won 56.6% of matches played (W/L 30/ 23), with Capecchi winning 20% (W/L 1/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 196/ 104), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Capecchi has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 66/ 45), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 30/ 12), where as Capecchi has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Gengel winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Gengel winning 4 and Capecchi winning 1. The last match between Gengel and Capecchi was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 07-11-2021, Final, Hard with Marek Gengel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:19:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gengel and Capecchi have played a deciding set 1 times, with Gengel winning 1 times and Capecchi 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Gengel winning 2, and Capecchi 1.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gengel has played against opponents with an average rank of 116.13 while Capecchi has played against players with an average rank of 371.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gengel has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Capecchi has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gengel has converted 46.95% of breakpoint opportunities, and Capecchi has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gengel 2 - 0 Capecchi
11
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
11
Minor
583
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
760
Rank
473
High
28
Age
R
Plays
2
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
2
Minor
Form
57% (296-227)
Career Total W/L
56% (268-209)
80% (20-5)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Marek Gengel | Daniele Capecchi |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 32 | 24 |
Aces (Total) | 14 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 5 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 2:19:30 | 2:19:30 |
1st Serve % | 67% (141/210) | 66% (116/175) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (97/141) | 72% (83/116) |
2nd Serve Win% | 49% (34/69) | 32% (19/59) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (9/18) | 27% (6/22) |
Return Points W% | 42% (73/175) | 38% (79/210) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-7(6) 6-2 6-3 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Daniele Capecchi
74%
(
77 of
104)
1st Serve %
64%
(
62 of
97)
7
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
6
71%
(
55 of
77)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
46 of
62)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
10 of
35)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
34 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
111
Total Points Won
90
|
||||
7-6(6) 7-6(6) |
Marek Gengel
Player
Daniele Capecchi
60%
(
64 of
106)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
66%
(
42 of
64)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
37 of
54)
45%
(
19 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
42%
(
45 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
32 of
78)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marek Gengel | Daniele Capecchi |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 78% (43/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 60% (303/202) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.45 | 0 |
Aces Total | 112 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 50 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:18:23 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 87.77 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1023/1485) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 73% (747/1023) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 54% (247/461) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 49% (83/171) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (662/1536) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 81% (21/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 84% (21/25) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 75% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 95% (21/20) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 5% (21/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Stijn Pel
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
83%
(
30 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
63
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
56%
(
49 of
88)
1st Serve %
68%
(
62 of
91)
3
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
6
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
33 of
62)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
12 of
29)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
46 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Karim Ibrahim
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
26 of
48)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
21 of
26)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
25%
(
13 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
18 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
43
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
46%
(
41 of
89)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
46 of
89)
89
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Marek Gengel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
28 of
43)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
71
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Fryderyk Lechno-Wasiutynski
82%
(
46 of
56)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
8
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marek Gengel
Player
Ali Habib
70%
(
60 of
86)
1st Serve %
53%
(
45 of
85)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
42 of
60)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
32 of
45)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
32 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
83
|
6-3 4-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Marek Gengel
55%
(
12 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
9 of
17)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
8 of
12)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
32%
(
7 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
21
Total Points Won
17
|
4-2 ret. | H2H | ||
F |
Marek Gengel
Player
Niels Visker
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
2
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
12 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Daniele Capecchi Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Daniele Capecchi
55%
(
53 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
57 of
95)
1
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
36 of
57)
56%
(
24 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
35%
(
34 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
95)
103
Total Points Won
88
|
6-1 6-7(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Guerrieri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
80 of
121)
1st Serve %
62%
(
83 of
133)
-
Aces
-
5
Double Faults
4
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
57 of
83)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
17 of
50)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
40%
(
49 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
59 of
133)
131
Total Points Won
123
|
6-7(4) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Adam Moundir
Player
Daniele Capecchi
44%
(
24 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
29 of
46)
3
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
3
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
21 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Yanaki Milev
Player
Daniele Capecchi
58%
(
64 of
110)
1st Serve %
62%
(
76 of
122)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
9
61%
(
39 of
64)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
41 of
76)
43%
(
20 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
75%
(
9 of
12)
Break Points Won
67%
(
6 of
9)
46%
(
51 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
62 of
122)
121
Total Points Won
111
|
6-7(5) 7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Johannes Haerteis
73%
(
71 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
60 of
85)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
45%
(
44 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
44 of
85)
97
Total Points Won
85
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Daniele Capecchi
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
47 of
63)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
9 of
16)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
36%
(
17 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Dusan Obradovic
71%
(
82 of
115)
1st Serve %
66%
(
74 of
112)
2
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
43 of
74)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
43%
(
50 of
115)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
55 of
112)
120
Total Points Won
107
|
3-6 7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Bor Artnak
71%
(
63 of
89)
1st Serve %
43%
(
44 of
102)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
23%
(
6 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
25 of
58)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
45%
(
40 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
52 of
102)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
6-1 5-7 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Cezar Cretu
Player
Daniele Capecchi
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
75%
(
78 of
104)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
54 of
78)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
35 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
40 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
99
|
7-5 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniele Capecchi
Player
Michele Ribecai
84%
(
37 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
14%
(
1 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
41%
(
18 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H |
view more