Mariano Navone vs Matic Spec Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Navone vs Spec analysis and find out who is favored!
Mariano Navone vs Matic Spec Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Navone has won 47.77% of points on his second serve, while Spec has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Navone, in recent form, has won 56.54% of his opponent's second serve points, while Spec has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 39.62% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Navone has saved 56.5% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Spec has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Navone has won 72.6% of matches played (W/L 53/ 20), with Spec winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Navone has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 208/ 108), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59).
- Player level: In the last year, Navone has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 77.55% of matches (W/L 38/ 11), where as Spec has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Navone winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Navone winning 2 and Spec winning 1. The last match between Navone and Spec was at the M15 Novi Sad, 28-07-2021, First, Clay with Mariano Navone getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Navone and Spec have played a deciding set 1 times, with Navone winning 1 times and Spec 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Navone winning 0, and Spec 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Navone has played against opponents with an average rank of 240.86 while Spec has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Navone has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Spec has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Navone has converted 44.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Spec has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Navone 1 - 0 Spec
5
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
41
Rank
41
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
65% (212-114)
Career Total W/L
64% (167-95)
70% (19-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$299,840
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mariano Navone | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 16 | 8 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
Avg Match Time | 2:31:0 | 2:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 58% (40/69) | 51% (45/89) |
1st Serve Win% | 70% (28/40) | 49% (22/45) |
2nd Serve Win% | 59% (17/29) | 50% (22/44) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 43% (6/14) | 29% (2/7) |
Return Points W% | 51% (45/89) | 35% (24/69) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 4-6 6-1 |
Mariano Navone
Player
Matic Spec
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
51%
(
45 of
89)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
24 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
45 of
89)
90
Total Points Won
68
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mariano Navone | Matic Spec |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 70% (19/8) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (42/23) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (331/268) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 73% (19/7) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.14 | 0 |
Aces Total | 40 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
DFs Total | 59 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 2:1:50 | 1st Match |
Avg Opp Rank | 207.15 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 69% (1312/1901) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 65% (850/1312) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (274/589) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (121/276) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 46% (964/2087) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 75% (15/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 67% (4/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 70% (19/27) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 81% (16/13) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 19% (16/3) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 55% (11/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more