Mariia Tkacheva vs Daria Kudashova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Within the sphere of second serve execution, Tkacheva has showcased a more robust performance in recent months, securing 42.32% of points compared to Kudashova’s 37.81%. This metric is significantly linked to the accuracy of match predictions. Analyzing their return game statistics, Kudashova holds a marginal advantage in recent form, having clinched 52.58% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tkacheva's figure stands at 47.03%. Moreover, in first serve returns, Kudashova leads with 34%, against Tkacheva's 32.56%. These return statistics play a crucial role in determining the favored player in head-to-head matchups.

Examining their performance under pressure, Kudashova has the upper hand with a 51.34% success rate in saving breakpoints, compared to Tkacheva at 46.3%. Breakpoint conversion, a crucial in-game betting predictor, reveals Kudashova’s superiority in recent form, converting 42.93% of opportunities, contrasting with Tkacheva’s 34.94%. Despite these figures, in terms of overall match performance during the last year, Tkacheva emerges stronger with a 72.31% win rate (W/L 47/18), overshadowing Kudashova’s 60% (W/L 33/22).

Surface-wise, Tkacheva excels on hard courts with a 72% career win rate (W/L 112/44), whereas Kudashova’s best lies on indoor hard courts at 67% (W/L 20/10). Both players face challenges on clay, with Tkacheva holding a 52% win rate (W/L 22/20), slightly lower than Kudashova's 58% (W/L 25/18). Comparing player levels, both participate primarily in the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, yet Tkacheva maintains a higher success rate of 70.45% (W/L 31/13) over Kudashova’s 61.22% (W/L 30/19).

Historically, in direct head-to-head encounters, Tkacheva has consistently dominated Kudashova, winning both previous matchups without dropping a set. The most recent meeting concluded with a decisive victory for Tkacheva at the W 50 Chihuahua event. Their encounters have averaged a duration of 1:6:30, with no decisive sets played. Notably, Tkacheva also holds an edge in tiebreaks, having won the sole tiebreak the pair contested.

Considering the quality of opponents, both have competed against adversaries with nearly identical averages, with Kudashova’s opponents ranked at 396.05 and Tkacheva’s at 399.22. When contemplating potential decisive set battles, Tkacheva’s 68% win rate in such scenarios over the past year stands superior to Kudashova’s 56%. Reflecting on all these analytical points, complemented by direct head-to-head outcomes and their competitive profiles, the prediction strongly leans towards Tkacheva securing yet another victory in the impending match.