Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marius Copil vs Bjorn Fratangelo Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Copil vs Fratangelo analysis and find out who is favored!
Marius Copil vs Bjorn Fratangelo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Copil has won 51.31% of points on his second serve, while Fratangelo has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Copil, in recent form, has won 47.21% of his opponent's second serve points, while Fratangelo has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.14% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Copil has saved 57.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Fratangelo has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Copil has won 51.92% of matches played (W/L 27/ 25), with Fratangelo winning 42.86% (W/L 3/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 149/ 166). Fratangelo has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 179/ 102), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 55% (W/L 21/ 17).
- Player level: In the last year, Copil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 52.17% of matches (W/L 24/ 22), where as Fratangelo has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 50% of matches (W/L 2/ 2). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Copil winning 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Copil winning 5 and Fratangelo winning 2. The last match between Copil and Fratangelo was at the Nottingham Challenger, 16-06-2017, Quarterfinals, Grass with Marius Copil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:29:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Copil and Fratangelo have played a deciding set 1 times, with Copil winning 0 times and Fratangelo 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Copil winning 1, and Fratangelo 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Copil has played against opponents with an average rank of 321.5 while Fratangelo has played against players with an average rank of 270.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Copil has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Fratangelo has won 67% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Copil has converted 36.27% of breakpoint opportunities, and Fratangelo has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Copil 2 - 1 Fratangelo
367
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
2
Grass0
794
Rank
99
High
30
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
54% (506-427)
Career Total W/L
60% (401-270)
44% (8-10)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,305,320
Career Prize Money
$948,485
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Copil VS Fratangelo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Marius Copil | Bjorn Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 2 |
| Games Won | 38 | 33 |
| Aces (Total) | 33 | 13 |
| DFs (Total) | 9 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:14 | 1:29:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (137/223) | 65% (134/205) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 80% (109/137) | 70% (94/134) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (48/86) | 62% (44/71) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (4/10) | 25% (3/12) |
| Return Points W% | 33% (67/205) | 30% (66/223) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (3/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (3/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 33% (3/1) |
Copil VS Fratangelo H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
65%
(
46 of
71)
1st Serve %
71%
(
55 of
77)
13
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
0
83%
(
38 of
46)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
68%
(
15 of
22)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
28 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
9
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
93%
(
25 of
27)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
||||
| 3-6 7-5 6-2 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Marius Copil
63%
(
48 of
76)
1st Serve %
62%
(
64 of
103)
4
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
68%
(
19 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
39 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
84
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marius Copil | Bjorn Fratangelo |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 44% (8/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 41% (17/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 48% (199/213) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.67 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 135 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 48 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:31 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 304.33 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (687/1176) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (521/687) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (247/489) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/95) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 35% (447/1261) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (8/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (10/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Marius Copil
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
38 of
64)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Bjorn Fratangelo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
57%
(
51 of
89)
1st Serve %
46%
(
38 of
83)
9
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
47%
(
18 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
32 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
35 of
83)
92
Total Points Won
80
|
6-3 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gael Monfils
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
6
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
10 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Alexis Galarneau
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexis Galarneau
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
66%
(
53 of
80)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
77%
(
41 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
44 of
63)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
27 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
96)
90
Total Points Won
86
|
4-6 6-3 3-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Mitchell Krueger
65%
(
76 of
117)
1st Serve %
64%
(
72 of
112)
8
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
68%
(
52 of
76)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
47 of
72)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
45 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
42 of
112)
114
Total Points Won
115
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Calvin Hemery
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
67%
(
48 of
72)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
64%
(
18 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
72)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Kyrian Jacquet
58%
(
28 of
48)
1st Serve %
53%
(
27 of
51)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
17%
(
4 of
24)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
19 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Facundo Diaz Acosta
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70%
(
39 of
56)
1st Serve %
66%
(
42 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Genaro Alberto Olivieri
Player
Bjorn Fratangelo
70%
(
67 of
96)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
94)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
40 of
55)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
19 of
39)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
33 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
92
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bjorn Fratangelo
Player
Juan Manuel Cerundolo
46%
(
30 of
65)
1st Serve %
67%
(
40 of
60)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Copil Vs Fratangelo Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
