Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marius Copil vs Matthew Ebden Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Copil vs Ebden analysis and find out who is favored!
Marius Copil vs Matthew Ebden Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Copil has won 51.55% of points on his second serve, while Ebden has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Copil, in recent form, has won 47.61% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ebden has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.34% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Copil has saved 57.45% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ebden has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Copil has won 52.94% of matches played (W/L 27/ 24), with Ebden winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Copil has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 64% (W/L 167/ 95), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 149/ 165). Ebden has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 65% (W/L 96/ 52), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 31% (W/L 17/ 38).
- Player level: In the last year, Copil has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 53.33% of matches (W/L 24/ 21), where as Ebden has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Copil winning 2 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Copil winning 4 and Ebden winning 2. The last match between Copil and Ebden was at the Surbiton Challenger, 07-06-2019, Quarterfinals, Grass with Marius Copil getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:14.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Copil and Ebden have played a deciding set 0 times, with Copil winning 0 times and Ebden 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Copil winning 1, and Ebden 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Copil has played against opponents with an average rank of 314.51 while Ebden has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Copil has won 73% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ebden has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Copil has converted 36.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ebden has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Copil 2 - 1 Ebden
360
Rank
56
High
33
Age
R
Plays
2
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
1
Grass1
738
Rank
39
High
36
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
54% (506-426)
Career Total W/L
56% (478-379)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,305,320
Career Prize Money
$1,387,350
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marius Copil | Matthew Ebden |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 2 |
| Games Won | 31 | 27 |
| Aces (Total) | 31 | 10 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:14 | 1:11:14 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (114/182) | 61% (111/183) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 77% (88/114) | 72% (80/111) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (32/68) | 50% (36/72) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 29% (5/17) | 44% (4/9) |
| Return Points W% | 37% (67/183) | 34% (62/182) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (2/3) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Marius Copil
Player
Matthew Ebden
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
9
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-3 6-3 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Marius Copil
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
5
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
28 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
72
Total Points Won
51
|
||||
| 7-6(1) 6-4 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Matthew Ebden
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
16
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
31 of
44)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
17 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
65
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marius Copil | Matthew Ebden |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (17/22) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (192/200) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.69 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 132 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 46 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:38:11 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 282.35 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 58% (649/1112) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 76% (495/649) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (235/463) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 35% (33/94) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 36% (431/1202) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 53% (8/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 47% (8/17) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 56% (5/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (8/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (8/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (9/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Marius Copil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Benjamin Bonzi
Player
Marius Copil
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve %
52%
(
33 of
63)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
44%
(
8 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
31%
(
17 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
31 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sergi Perez Contri
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
52 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
30 of
53)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
22 of
30)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
53)
65
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Damir Dzumhur
Player
Marius Copil
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve %
59%
(
29 of
49)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
62%
(
28 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
49
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Gea
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
47 of
69)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
9
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
62)
72
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Marius Copil
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve %
65%
(
42 of
65)
10
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
87%
(
34 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
31 of
42)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
16 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Poullain
Player
Marius Copil
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
0
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
25 of
37)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Henri Squire
Player
Marius Copil
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
3
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
51
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Lloyd Harris
54%
(
51 of
95)
1st Serve %
61%
(
65 of
107)
7
Aces
14
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
68%
(
30 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
28 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
113
Total Points Won
89
|
7-6(4) 6-7(7) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marius Copil
Player
Altug Celikbilek
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
54%
(
43 of
79)
8
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
28 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
29 of
43)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
23%
(
3 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
57
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Ebden Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Matthew Ebden
45%
(
22 of
49)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
10
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
6
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Matthew Ebden
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
4
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
7
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
71%
(
20 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
74
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Kaichi Uchida
Player
Matthew Ebden
48%
(
19 of
40)
1st Serve %
51%
(
31 of
61)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
6
89%
(
17 of
19)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
31 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tim Van Rijthoven
Player
Matthew Ebden
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
54 of
78)
13
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
3
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
83%
(
45 of
54)
69%
(
24 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
23 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
20 of
78)
81
Total Points Won
81
|
7-6(4) 7-6(9) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Zizou Bergs
61%
(
30 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
27 of
50)
1
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Stefan Kozlov
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
7
81%
(
39 of
48)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
24%
(
5 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
25 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
71
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Matthew Ebden
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
6
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
2
73%
(
35 of
48)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
33%
(
23 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
21 of
52)
67
Total Points Won
54
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nicolas Kicker
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
20 of
34)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
30 of
56)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Norbert Gombos
Player
Matthew Ebden
59%
(
83 of
141)
1st Serve %
65%
(
93 of
142)
4
Aces
23
6
Double Faults
8
66%
(
55 of
83)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
67 of
93)
48%
(
28 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
17 of
49)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
41%
(
58 of
141)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
58 of
142)
141
Total Points Won
142
|
6-7(3) 7-6(5) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Matthew Ebden
Player
Dominic Stricker
76%
(
45 of
59)
1st Serve %
47%
(
27 of
57)
12
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
13 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(2) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Copil Vs Ebden Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
