Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Mark Vervoort vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vervoort vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Vervoort vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vervoort has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vervoort, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vervoort has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vervoort has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vervoort has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 68/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vervoort winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vervoort winning 0 and Minc winning 2. The last match between Vervoort and Minc was at the M25 Vale Do Lobo, 25-10-2020, Q1 round, Hard with Charles Minc getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vervoort and Minc have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vervoort winning 0 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vervoort winning 0, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vervoort has played against opponents with an average rank of while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vervoort has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vervoort has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vervoort 0 - 1 Minc
Ret.
Rank
817
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
35% (86-160)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Mark Vervoort | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-1 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Mark Vervoort | Charles Minc |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mark Vervoort Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats 
Michael Geerts
Player
Mark Vervoort
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mark Vervoort
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mark Vervoort
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Mark Vervoort
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Mark Vervoort
Player
Youlian Iakovlev
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Riccardo Bellotti
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Jelle Sels
Player
Mark Vervoort
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Vervoort Vs Minc Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
