Mark Vervoort vs Jordi Samper-Montana Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vervoort vs Samper-Montana analysis and find out who is favored!
Mark Vervoort vs Jordi Samper-Montana Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vervoort has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vervoort, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Samper-Montana has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vervoort has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Samper-Montana has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vervoort has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Samper-Montana winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vervoort has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 35% (W/L 68/ 125), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Samper-Montana has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 57% (W/L 69/ 51), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 3).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vervoort has played against opponents with an average rank of while Samper-Montana has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vervoort has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Samper-Montana has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vervoort has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Samper-Montana has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vervoort 0 - 0 Samper-Montana
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
817
High
33
Age
R
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
179
High
33
Age
R
Plays
20
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
20
Minor
Form
35% (86-160)
Career Total W/L
56% (442-346)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$84,925
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Vervoort VS Samper-Montana H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mark Vervoort | Jordi Samper-Montana |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Mark Vervoort Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Mark Vervoort
62%
(
18 of
29)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
83%
(
15 of
18)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
4 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
51
Total Points Won
20
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Riccardo Balzerani
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
25 of
42)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
15 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
68)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nerman Fatic
Player
Mark Vervoort
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
55%
(
31 of
56)
6
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
93%
(
13 of
14)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mark Vervoort
51%
(
26 of
51)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
5
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
19 of
26)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
76%
(
19 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
13 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
65
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jonathan Eysseric
Player
Mark Vervoort
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
55%
(
23 of
42)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
16 of
23)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
14 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
28
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mark Vervoort
Player
Youlian Iakovlev
73%
(
43 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
25 of
34)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
22 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Riccardo Bellotti
Player
Mark Vervoort
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
68%
(
27 of
40)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
88%
(
14 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
6 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jelle Sels
Player
Mark Vervoort
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
38 of
59)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
28 of
59)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-5 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Jordi Samper-Montana Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | 7-5 2-6 4-1 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
56%
(
5 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
43%
(
23 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
77)
69
Total Points Won
61
|
4-6 6-1 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Carlos Gimeno Valero
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve %
54%
(
37 of
68)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
27%
(
3 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
18 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Raul Brancaccio
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
56%
(
29 of
52)
1st Serve %
56%
(
42 of
75)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
36 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gengo Kikuchi
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
19 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
100%
(
9 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
13%
(
4 of
32)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Len Schouten
62%
(
37 of
60)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
52%
(
12 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Palaphoom Kovapitukted
56%
(
48 of
85)
1st Serve %
49%
(
43 of
88)
8
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
5
75%
(
36 of
48)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
20 of
45)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
37 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-2 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Ko Suzuki
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
60%
(
50 of
84)
1st Serve %
69%
(
71 of
103)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
42%
(
35 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
90
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 0-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jordi Samper-Montana
Player
Shohei Chikami
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Pol Toledo Bague
Player
Jordi Samper-Montana
72%
(
71 of
98)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
88)
1
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
41 of
62)
52%
(
14 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
92
Total Points Won
94
|
2-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more