Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marlon Vankan vs Martin Benes Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Vankan vs Benes analysis and find out who is favored!
Marlon Vankan vs Martin Benes Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Vankan has won 44.92% of points on his second serve, while Benes has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Vankan, in recent form, has won 49.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Benes has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.61% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Vankan has saved 56.28% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benes has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Vankan has won 58.73% of matches played (W/L 37/ 26), with Benes winning 48.15% (W/L 13/ 14) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Vankan has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 110/ 86), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 35% (W/L 9/ 17). Benes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 46% (W/L 31/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Vankan has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 36/ 24), where as Benes has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 48.15% of matches (W/L 13/ 14). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Vankan winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Vankan winning 2 and Benes winning 0. The last match between Vankan and Benes was at the M15 Eupen, 08-08-2022, Q2 round, Clay with Marlon Vankan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:17:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Vankan and Benes have played a deciding set 0 times, with Vankan winning 0 times and Benes 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Vankan winning 0, and Benes 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Vankan has played against opponents with an average rank of 184.33 while Benes has played against players with an average rank of 51.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Vankan has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benes has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Vankan has converted 39.49% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benes has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Vankan 1 - 0 Benes
558
Rank
558
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
53% (123-109)
Career Total W/L
42% (36-50)
47% (8-9)
YTD W/L
33% (1-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marlon Vankan | Martin Benes |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:17:0 | 1:17:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (38/56) | 64% (32/50) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 76% (29/38) | 63% (20/32) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 56% (10/18) | 50% (9/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 25% (1/4) |
| Return Points W% | 42% (21/50) | 30% (17/56) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 6-4 |
Stats 
Marlon Vankan
Player
Martin Benes
68%
(
38 of
56)
1st Serve %
64%
(
32 of
50)
5
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
1
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
20 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
17 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
21 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marlon Vankan | Martin Benes |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 47% (8/9) | 33% (1/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 44% (19/24) | 43% (3/4) |
| Games Win/Loss | 47% (186/212) | 44% (35/44) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 47% (8/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.12 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 24 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.23 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 45 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:37 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 161.24 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (880/1320) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 63% (550/880) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 45% (198/440) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 39% (52/133) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 39% (493/1250) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 47% (7/8) | 33% (1/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 44% (7/16) | 33% (1/3) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 71% (5/7) | 100% (2/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 67% (9/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 33% (9/3) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (2/0) |
Marlon Vankan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
Player
Marlon Vankan
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Eero Vasa
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
76)
3
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
76)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 3-6 4-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Artur Kukasian
67%
(
82 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
2
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
7
56%
(
46 of
82)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
36 of
54)
50%
(
20 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
56 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
41 of
96)
107
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(4) 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Atakan Karahan
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
47 of
89)
1st Serve %
67%
(
66 of
99)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
42 of
66)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
33 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
41 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Lewie Lane
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
69 of
95)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
46 of
67)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
44 of
69)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
42 of
95)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(5) 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Louis Tessa
Player
Marlon Vankan
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
81%
(
30 of
37)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
20%
(
1 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Atakan Karahan
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
29%
(
7 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
44%
(
36 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 1-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Kuan-Yi Lee
Player
Marlon Vankan
65%
(
30 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
46 of
64)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
17 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
34 of
64)
63
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marlon Vankan
Player
Louroi Martinez
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
97)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
41%
(
37 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
48 of
97)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tristan Mccormick
Player
Marlon Vankan
53%
(
30 of
57)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
11
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
36 of
56)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
84)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Martin Benes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-7(5) 10-8 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-6(10) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 7-5 2-6 10-7 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Henrik Bladelius
Player
Martin Benes
50%
(
33 of
66)
1st Serve %
55%
(
37 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
30 of
67)
72
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Matej Rudolf
Player
Martin Benes
65%
(
53 of
81)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
32%
(
9 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
10 of
30)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
41 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
81
|
6-4 1-6 10-8 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
| QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Vankan Vs Benes Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
