Martin Landaluce vs Borna Gojo Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 16 Oct at 04:00 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Landaluce vs B. Gojo

ESP
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Landaluce 1 - 0 Gojo
They have played 3 sets in total, with Martin Landaluce winning 2 and Borna Gojo winning 1. The last match between Martin Landaluce and Borna Gojo was at the Olbia Challenger, 16-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Martin Landaluce getting the victory 6-3 3-6 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Landaluce | 1 |
Gojo | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) Olbia Challenger(10-16-25)
M. Landaluce vs B. Gojo H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$301,960 | Career Prize Money | $669,560 |
56.45% (105-81) | Career Total W/L | 58.50% (258-183) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
3 | Titles | 2 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
16.67% (1-5) | YTD Win/Loss | 0.00% (0-5) |
M. Landaluce vs B. Gojo Match Preview:
- Martin Landaluce has a slightly lower success rate on second serve points, winning 42.38%, compared to Borna Gojo's 45.38%. Could this affect their overall match performance?
- In terms of returning the opponent's second serve, both players show similar efficiency, with Gojo having a marginal edge at 46.01% over Landaluce's 45.47%.
- Regarding first serve returns, Landaluce leads with a 26.77% success rate, whereas Gojo trails slightly at 24.28%.
- How do players handle pressure? Landaluce excels by saving 55.42% of breakpoints, outperforming Gojo's 52.78% in these situations.
- Overall match performance for the last year sees Gojo at a higher win percentage (61.90%) than Landaluce (59.46%).
- Surface expertise varies, with Landaluce performing best on Grass (67% wins), while Gojo shines on Hard courts, also with a 67% win rate.
- Gojo has competed against less-ranked opponents, with an average rank of 264 compared to Landaluce's 208.12, offering a different experience intensity.
- In deciding sets, Landaluce exhibits greater resilience, winning 63% compared to Gojo's 44%.
Editorial Prediction (October 16, 2025, UTC):
The head-to-head analysis shows Borna Gojo having a slight statistical edge over Martin Landaluce in second serve efficacy and overall yearly performance. While Landaluce excels in breakpoint situations and thrives in deciding set scenarios, his advantage may not be sufficient to overcome Gojo's consistent form on hard surfaces.
Additionally, Gojo's extensive experience playing on his preferred surface and his strategic return games offer him an advantage. However, Landaluce's ability to handle pressure effectively and secure crucial points should not be underestimated.
Considering these factors, Borna Gojo is predicted to be the more likely victor in this upcoming tennis match.
Martin Landaluce vs Borna Gojo Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Landaluce vs B. Gojo H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 1 |
15 | Games Won | 12 |
5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
2:9:42 | Average Match Time | 2:9:42 |
61% (46/76) | 1st Serve % | 63% (59/93) |
78% (36/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (44/59) |
63% (19/30) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) |
18% (2/11) | Break Pts Won % | 20% (1/5) |
35% (33/93) | Return Points Win % | 28% (21/76) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Landaluce Recent Matches Played
B. Gojo Recent Matches Played

M. Landaluce vs B. Gojo Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.45% (105/81) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.50% (258/183) |
53.90% (242/207) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.67% (599/458) |
51.53% (2220/2088) | Games Win/Loss | 52.51% (5503/4976) |
62.65% (52/31) | Hard Win/Loss | 61.31% (122/77) |
47.22% (34/38) | Clay Win/Loss | 54.87% (62/51) |
57.89% (11/8) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.38% (64/42) |
66.67% (8/4) | Grass Win/Loss | 43.48% (10/13) |
0.35 | Aces Per Game | 0.66 |
728 | Aces Total | 3382 |
0.36 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.28 |
763 | Total Double Faults | 1425 |
1:53:19 | Average Match Time | 1:37:41 |
314.45 | Average Opponent Rank | 432.72 |
63% (8589/13736) | 1st Serve % | 62% (19702/31538) |
69% (5941/8589) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (14536/19702) |
49% (2524/5147) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5847/11836) |
40% (568/1425) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1081/2693) |
40% (5555/13921) | Return Points Win % | 37% (11576/31043) |
63.64% (7/4) | Slam W/L | 56.25% (18/14) |
44.44% (4/5) | Masters W/L | 50.00% (7/7) |
0.00% (0/1) | Cups W/L | 60.00% (9/6) |
0.00% (0/9) | Main Tour W/L | 48.94% (23/24) |
58.77% (67/47) | Challenger W/L | 60.71% (153/99) |
64.29% (27/15) | Futures W/L | 59.26% (48/33) |
57% (104/183) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (252/432) |
33% (1/3) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
44% (28/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (113/216) |
57% (42/74) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (87/167) |
84% (100/84) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (260/213) |
16% (100/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (260/47) |
24% (86/21) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (180/43) |