Marvin Barker vs Mikal Statham Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Barker vs Statham analysis and find out who is favored!
Marvin Barker vs Mikal Statham Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Barker has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Statham has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Barker, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Statham has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Barker has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Statham has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Barker has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Statham winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Barker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 22/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Statham has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 39% (W/L 56/ 88), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Barker has played against opponents with an average rank of while Statham has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Barker has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Statham has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Barker has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Statham has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Barker 0 - 0 Statham
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Ret.
Rank
High
32
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
36
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
36% (35-61)
Career Total W/L
36% (66-118)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$600
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Marvin Barker | Mikal Statham |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | N/A | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Marvin Barker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-1 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 | 6-2 4-4 ret. | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 | 6-4 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more
Mikal Statham Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-0 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 2-6 6-0 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-0 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Colin Sinclair
Player
Mikal Statham
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
82%
(
31 of
38)
2
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jeremy Beale
Player
Mikal Statham
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
31 of
49)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
27 of
49)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jacob Brumm
Player
Mikal Statham
69%
(
36 of
52)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
2
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
3
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
16 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
30 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jean Thirouin
Player
Mikal Statham
48%
(
25 of
52)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
7
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
53
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mikal Statham
Player
Zakai Stone
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H |
view more