Mateo Berne vs Tomas Farjat Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Berne vs Farjat analysis and find out who is favored!
Mateo Berne vs Tomas Farjat Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Berne has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Farjat has won 46.11%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Berne, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Farjat has won 50.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 35.09% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Berne has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Farjat has saved 59.52% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Berne has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Farjat winning 53.03% (W/L 35/ 31) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Berne has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 24/ 36). Farjat has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 30/ 18), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 125/ 94).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Berne winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Berne winning 0 and Farjat winning 2. The last match between Berne and Farjat was at the M15 Buenos Aires, 06-05-2019, Q1 round, Clay with Tomas Farjat getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Berne and Farjat have played a deciding set 0 times, with Berne winning 0 times and Farjat 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Berne winning 0, and Farjat 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Berne has played against opponents with an average rank of while Farjat has played against players with an average rank of 133.74.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Berne has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Farjat has won 57% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Berne has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Farjat has converted 45.64% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Berne 0 - 1 Farjat
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
612
Rank
554
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
40% (24-36)
Career Total W/L
58% (155-112)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
47% (8-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mateo Berne | Tomas Farjat |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
Games Won | 7 | 12 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-3 6-4 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mateo Berne | Tomas Farjat |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (19/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 51% (176/168) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 47% (8/9) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.32 |
Aces Total | 0 | 54 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.19 |
DFs Total | 0 | 32 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:22:14 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 15.41 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 54% (504/927) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 66% (333/504) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (183/423) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 48% (48/100) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (394/908) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 53% (8/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 44% (7/16) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/4) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 73% (11/8) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 27% (11/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (6/0) |
Mateo Berne Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 6-0 3-1 ret. | H2H | |||
QF | 6-3 3-6 10-4 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-3 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Ezequiel Simonit
Player
Mateo Berne
57%
(
25 of
44)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
8
76%
(
19 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
17 of
32)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
14 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mateo Berne
Player
Mateo Branc
53%
(
35 of
66)
1st Serve %
73%
(
44 of
60)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
14 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
41%
(
27 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
31 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
56
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mateo Berne
Player
Ayrton Andres Rodriguez
44%
(
32 of
73)
1st Serve %
80%
(
63 of
79)
2
Aces
1
9
Double Faults
3
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
41%
(
17 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
79)
78
Total Points Won
74
|
6-7(2) 6-2 11-9 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | |||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Alex Barrena
Player
Mateo Berne
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
8)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
19 of
54)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Tomas Farjat Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Lautaro Agustin Falabella
Player
Tomas Farjat
63%
(
69 of
110)
1st Serve %
60%
(
66 of
110)
1
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
61%
(
25 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
40 of
110)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
110)
114
Total Points Won
106
|
6-7(2) 7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Andrea Collarini
Player
Tomas Farjat
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
37 of
61)
3
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
28 of
39)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
61)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Bautista Vilicich
Player
Tomas Farjat
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
49%
(
25 of
51)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
30 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
47
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomas Farjat
Player
Joel Angel Lucero
55%
(
29 of
53)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
SF |
Lautaro Midon
Player
Tomas Farjat
63%
(
55 of
88)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
3
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
36 of
52)
55%
(
18 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
38 of
87)
96
Total Points Won
79
|
6-1 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tomas Farjat
Player
Sean Hess
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
22 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
47%
(
34 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
38 of
69)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Tomas Farjat
Player
Leonardo Monferrer
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
60%
(
30 of
50)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
36%
(
8 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
20 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
44
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Tomas Farjat
Player
Nicolas Parizzia
50%
(
2 of
4)
1st Serve %
80%
(
12 of
15)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
100%
(
2 of
2)
1st Serve Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
100%
(
2 of
2)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
0%
(
0 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
13
Total Points Won
6
|
2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
R1 |
Santiago De La Fuente
Player
Tomas Farjat
64%
(
49 of
76)
1st Serve %
56%
(
48 of
86)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
2
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
38%
(
29 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
88
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 | 3-6 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H |
view more