Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matias Soto vs Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Soto vs Schulenburg analysis and find out who is favored!
Matias Soto vs Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Soto has won 48.81% of points on his second serve, while Schulenburg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Soto, in recent form, has won 49.29% of his opponent's second serve points, while Schulenburg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.84% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Soto has saved 60.42% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Schulenburg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Soto has won 55.56% of matches played (W/L 30/ 24), with Schulenburg winning 73.33% (W/L 11/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Soto has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 33/ 21), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Schulenburg has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 69% (W/L 11/ 5), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 3/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Soto has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.89% of matches (W/L 22/ 16), where as Schulenburg has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 73.33% of matches (W/L 11/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Soto winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Soto winning 2 and Schulenburg winning 1. The last match between Soto and Schulenburg was at the M15 Poprad, 06-07-2021, First, Clay with Matias Soto getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:39:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Soto and Schulenburg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Soto winning 1 times and Schulenburg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Soto winning 0, and Schulenburg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Soto has played against opponents with an average rank of 302.09 while Schulenburg has played against players with an average rank of 191.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Soto has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Schulenburg has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Soto has converted 46.2% of breakpoint opportunities, and Schulenburg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Soto 1 - 0 Schulenburg
423
Rank
422
High
24
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
22
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
60% (86-58)
Career Total W/L
59% (38-26)
60% (12-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,550
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Soto VS Schulenburg H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Matias Soto | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 14 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 8 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:39:0 | 2:39:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 57% (56/99) | 58% (59/102) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 64% (36/56) | 68% (40/59) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (17/43) | 37% (16/43) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 31% (5/16) | 40% (4/10) |
| Return Points W% | 45% (46/102) | 46% (46/99) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Soto VS Schulenburg H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 2-6 6-4 |
Stats 
Matias Soto
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
57%
(
56 of
99)
1st Serve %
58%
(
59 of
102)
3
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
8
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
40 of
59)
40%
(
17 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
16 of
43)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
46 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
102)
99
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matias Soto | Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 60% (12/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (27/18) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 52% (238/223) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 56% (5/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (7/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 66 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.32 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 73 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:57 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 374.05 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (929/1493) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 73% (681/929) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (283/564) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (50/108) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (537/1445) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 61% (11/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (12/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (6/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 85% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 15% (13/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 14% (7/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Matias Soto Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Ryan Seggerman
Player
Matias Soto
53%
(
24 of
45)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
54)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alafia Ayeni
Player
Matias Soto
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
25 of
35)
67%
(
16 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
18 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
21 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Niki Kaliyanda Poonacha
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
77%
(
44 of
57)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
70%
(
31 of
44)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
25 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Matias Soto
66%
(
61 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
68 of
106)
26
Aces
6
9
Double Faults
7
87%
(
53 of
61)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
52 of
68)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
24 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
35 of
106)
104
Total Points Won
95
|
4-6 7-6(6) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Nicolas Mejia
Player
Matias Soto
56%
(
53 of
94)
1st Serve %
52%
(
49 of
94)
10
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
10
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
19 of
45)
54%
(
7 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
39 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
47 of
94)
102
Total Points Won
86
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
48%
(
35 of
73)
10
Aces
17
3
Double Faults
7
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
26 of
35)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
26 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
65
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Tomas Barrios Vera
50%
(
31 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
34 of
62)
6
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Murkel Alejandro Dellien Velasco
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Benjamin Lock
53%
(
40 of
76)
1st Serve %
50%
(
43 of
86)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
64%
(
23 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
20 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
34 of
86)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matias Soto
Player
Facundo Mena
69%
(
48 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
2
79%
(
38 of
48)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
24 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Nicolas Zanellato
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
35 of
56)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
74%
(
32 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
17 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
24 of
56)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Tim Handel
65%
(
66 of
102)
1st Serve %
64%
(
71 of
111)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
44 of
71)
47%
(
17 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
21 of
40)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
39%
(
40 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
46 of
111)
108
Total Points Won
105
|
4-6 7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Kilian Feldbausch
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
66%
(
44 of
67)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
17 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
40%
(
23 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
67)
68
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Francois Musitelli
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
40 of
62)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
32 of
36)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
14 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Elmer Moller
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
62%
(
52 of
84)
1st Serve %
52%
(
48 of
93)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
4
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
14 of
45)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
38%
(
32 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
47 of
93)
99
Total Points Won
78
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Karl Friberg
60%
(
63 of
105)
1st Serve %
69%
(
87 of
126)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
57 of
87)
60%
(
25 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
11 of
39)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
40%
(
42 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
58 of
126)
121
Total Points Won
110
|
4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Guy Den Ouden
64%
(
62 of
97)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
104)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
8
69%
(
43 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
38 of
57)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
43 of
104)
105
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Younes Lalami Laaroussi
56%
(
33 of
59)
1st Serve %
74%
(
57 of
77)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
24%
(
14 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
59
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Sander Jong
Player
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve %
65%
(
26 of
40)
4
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
27
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Jeffrey Von Der Schulenburg
Player
Liam Gavrielides
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve %
62%
(
21 of
34)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
80%
(
16 of
20)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
35
Total Points Won
24
|
6-4 1-0 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Soto Vs Schulenburg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
