Matic Spec vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Spec vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Matic Spec vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Spec has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 51.53%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Spec, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.68%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 36.84% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Spec has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 58.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Spec has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Paul winning 62.12% (W/L 41/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Spec has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 74% (W/L 14/ 5), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 94/ 59). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 64/ 37), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Spec winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Spec winning 4 and Paul winning 1. The last match between Spec and Paul was at the M15 St. Petersburg, 15-04-2021, Second, I.hard with Matic Spec getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Spec and Paul have played a deciding set 1 times, with Spec winning 1 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Spec winning 1, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Spec has played against opponents with an average rank of while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 221.88.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Spec has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Spec has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 50.5% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Spec 2 - 0 Paul
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
819
Rank
710
High
29
Age
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
1
Indoor0
0
Grass0
516
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
64% (167-95)
Career Total W/L
54% (173-145)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
59% (13-9)
$0
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matic Spec | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 29 | 18 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 5 |
DFs (Total) | 7 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:14:30 | 1:14:30 |
1st Serve % | 66% (63/96) | 60% (64/107) |
1st Serve Win% | 63% (40/63) | 63% (40/64) |
2nd Serve Win% | 45% (15/33) | 49% (21/43) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 46% (6/13) | 63% (5/8) |
Return Points W% | 43% (46/107) | 43% (41/96) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-3 |
Matic Spec
Player
Jakub Paul
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
60%
(
64 of
107)
1
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
7
63%
(
40 of
63)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
40 of
64)
45%
(
15 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
41 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
102
|
||||
6-2 6-1 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matic Spec | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (13/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 56% (28/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 52% (244/228) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (9/6) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 57% (4/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0 | 0.12 |
Aces Total | 0 | 28 |
DFs per game | 0 | 0.15 |
DFs Total | 0 | 35 |
Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:40:35 |
Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 240.41 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 67% (1024/1533) |
1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 62% (633/1024) |
2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (255/509) |
BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 51% (79/156) |
Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 43% (656/1526) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 59% (10/7) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (12/21) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 67% (4/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/5) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 83% (12/10) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 17% (12/2) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
Matic Spec Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
Guy Den Ouden
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
63 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
59 of
92)
6
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
3
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
34 of
59)
46%
(
17 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
12 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
42%
(
42 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
46 of
92)
104
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Matic Spec
Player
Nikolay Vylegzhanin
61%
(
55 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
14 of
25)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
40%
(
36 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
81
|
1-6 7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Francesco Passaro
61%
(
59 of
97)
1st Serve %
58%
(
62 of
107)
0
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
62)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
21 of
45)
35%
(
6 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
43%
(
42 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
51 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
98
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hikaru Shiraishi
Player
Matic Spec
63%
(
42 of
67)
1st Serve %
70%
(
58 of
83)
3
Aces
10
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
41 of
58)
80%
(
20 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
13 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Matic Spec
Player
Christoph Negritu
59%
(
60 of
102)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
0
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
42 of
63)
48%
(
20 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
7 of
28)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
44 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
42 of
91)
100
Total Points Won
93
|
6-2 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Pietro Marino
Player
Matic Spec
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve %
67%
(
41 of
61)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Tim Sandkaulen
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
78%
(
74 of
95)
5
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
49 of
74)
69%
(
20 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
28%
(
21 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
95)
89
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-4 6-3 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Jorge Brian Panta Herreros
Player
Matic Spec
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
6
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
26 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 | 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Amr Elsayed
Player
Jakub Paul
67%
(
81 of
121)
1st Serve %
72%
(
74 of
103)
5
Aces
2
9
Double Faults
0
68%
(
55 of
81)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
48%
(
19 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
11 of
29)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
47 of
121)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
103)
115
Total Points Won
109
|
6-7(8) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Illya Beloborodko
Player
Jakub Paul
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
0
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
20 of
38)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
49
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H |
view more