Matisse Bobichon vs Marat Sharipov (RUS) Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 22 Oct at 10:07 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Bobichon vs M. Sharipov (RUS)

 FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
.jpg)
 RUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bobichon 1 - 0 (RUS)
They have played 3 sets in total, with Matisse Bobichon winning 2 and Marat Sharipov (RUS) winning 1. The last match between Matisse Bobichon and Marat Sharipov (RUS) was at the M25 Sheffield, 22-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: I.hard, with Matisse Bobichon getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Bobichon | 1 | 
| (RUS) | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sheffield(10-22-25)
M. Bobichon vs M. S. (RUS) H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 | 
| 65.75% (48-25) | Career Total W/L | 66.08% (189-97) | 
| 1 | Indoor | 0 | 
| 0 | Titles | 9 | 
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 | 
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) | 
M. Bobichon vs M. S. (RUS) Match Preview:
- How do the players compare in second serve performance? Matisse Bobichon has recently won 46.79% of points on his second serve, slightly better than Marat Sharipov's 43.50%.
- Could return game stats provide an insight into the match? Yes, Bobichon has won 45.42% of his opponent's second serve points compared to Sharipov's 46.75%, showcasing a slight edge for Sharipov in return games.
- First serve returns have shown Bobichon to have a slight advantage, winning 25.30% of points, compared to Sharipov's 23.93%.
- Who performs better under pressure? Sharipov has saved 53.67% of breakpoints, outperforming Bobichon who has saved 46.20%.
- In terms of win percentage over the last year, both players are quite close, with Bobichon at 64.71% and Sharipov at 64.86%.
- Both players excel on hard surfaces, with a career win percentage of 73% each. However, Sharipov holds a better win percentage on clay.
- Bobichon has primarily competed at the Futures/ITF $10K level, winning 65.96% of matches, while Sharipov has played at the Challengers/ITF > $10K level, with a 60% win rate.
- In terms of opponent quality, Bobichon has faced higher-ranked opponents with an average rank of 343.65 compared to Sharipov's 401.54.
- Sharipov has a significant advantage in deciding sets, having won 74% compared to Bobichon's 47% over the past year.
Editorial Prediction (October 22, 2025, UTC):
Matisse Bobichon and Marat Sharipov present a closely matched contest, with both having strengths and weaknesses highlighted by recent statistics.
Bobichon shows a slight edge in first serve return performance, yet Sharipov compensates with better breakpoint saving capabilities, a crucial factor under pressure.
Sharipov's familiarity with higher-tier tournaments and success in deciding sets provide him a potential advantage, despite Bobichon contending against tougher opponents.
Given these factors, Marat Sharipov is predicted to be the more likely victor in the upcoming match.
Matisse Bobichon vs Marat Sharipov (RUS) Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Bobichon vs M. S. (RUS) H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 | 
| 15 | Games Won | 14 | 
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 10 | 
| 0 | Total Double Faults | 3 | 
| 2:1:11 | Average Match Time | 2:1:11 | 
| 72% (72/100) | 1st Serve % | 65% (48/74) | 
| 65% (47/72) | 1st Serve Win % | 79% (38/48) | 
| 57% (16/28) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (14/26) | 
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (2/7) | 
| 30% (22/74) | Return Points Win % | 37% (37/100) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
Recent Performance Stats
M. Bobichon Recent Matches Played
M. S. (RUS) Recent Matches Played

M. Bobichon vs M. S. (RUS) Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.75% (48/25) | YTD Win/Loss | 66.08% (189/97) | 
| 63.41% (104/60) | Sets Win/Loss | 63.20% (407/237) | 
| 56.07% (877/687) | Games Win/Loss | 55.51% (3375/2705) | 
| 72.73% (32/12) | Hard Win/Loss | 73.81% (93/33) | 
| 50.00% (8/8) | Clay Win/Loss | 60.33% (73/48) | 
| 61.54% (8/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 58.97% (23/16) | 
| 0.28 | Aces Per Game | 0.68 | 
| 210 | Aces Total | 2016 | 
| 0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 | 
| 128 | Total Double Faults | 679 | 
| 1:16:4 | Average Match Time | 1:28:45 | 
| 331.1 | Average Opponent Rank | 483.83 | 
| 59% (2050/3491) | 1st Serve % | 58% (10116/17490) | 
| 71% (1459/2050) | 1st Serve Win % | 75% (7607/10116) | 
| 50% (721/1441) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (3763/7374) | 
| 42% (139/332) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (791/1923) | 
| 39% (1350/3459) | Return Points Win % | 41% (7317/18018) | 
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 0.00% (0/1) | 
| 50.00% (2/2) | Challenger W/L | 58.49% (31/22) | 
| 66.67% (46/23) | Futures W/L | 68.10% (158/74) | 
| 66% (46/70) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 67% (185/277) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/3) | 
| 47% (8/17) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 56% (52/93) | 
| 53% (10/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 60% (45/75) | 
| 89% (47/42) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (191/174) | 
| 11% (47/5) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (191/17) | 
| 23% (26/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 16% (95/15) | 












