Matt Kuhar vs Alvin Nicholas Tudorica Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 02 Jul at 06:50 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Kuhar vs A. Nicholas Tudorica

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Kuhar 1 - 0 Tudorica
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matt Kuhar winning 2 and Alvin Nicholas Tudorica winning 0. The last match between Matt Kuhar and Alvin Nicholas Tudorica was at the M25 Laval, 02-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Matt Kuhar getting the victory 7-5 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Kuhar | 1 |
| Tudorica | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Laval(07-02-25)
M. Kuhar vs A. N. Tudorica H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 55.85% (105-83) | Career Total W/L | 62.77% (86-51) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 0 | Titles | 3 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Kuhar vs A. N. Tudorica Match Preview:
- How do the players' second serve performances compare in recent months? Tudorica has secured 39.43% of second serve points, while Kuhar has a slightly higher success rate at 41.54%.
- Looking at return game performance, which player has the edge? On second serves, Kuhar edges out Tudorica by winning 49.65% compared to Tudorica's 48.28%. However, Tudorica leads on first serve returns, winning 29.22% compared to Kuhar's 26.97%.
- How do both players handle pressure, particularly breakpoints? Tudorica has saved 52.05% of breakpoints, closely followed by Kuhar's 52.33%.
- Over the past year, which player has been more successful? Tudorica boasts a 65.93% win rate, significantly higher than Kuhar's 50%.
- Is there a preferred surface for these players? Both excel on Hard courts, with Tudorica winning 73% of matches and Kuhar winning 59%. They both underperform on Clay courts, with win rates of 48% and 47% respectively.
- Judging by the level of play, who stands out? Tudorica has excelled in ITF tournaments, with a 72% win rate, while Kuhar has won 51.22% of matches at the same level.
- What does the quality of opposition faced tell us about these players? Tudorica has competed against higher-ranked opponents, averaging a ranking of 412.07, compared to Kuhar's 456.52.
- In matches that go the distance, who performs better? Tudorica has a 53% success rate in deciding sets, while Kuhar trails at 38%.
- Who is more efficient at converting breakpoints? Kuhar has a better conversion rate at 44.19%, compared to Tudorica's 31.8%.
Editorial Prediction (July 2, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Tudorica and Kuhar promises to be competitive, with several key statistics offering insights into their potential performances.
While Kuhar slightly outperforms Tudorica on second serve points and breakpoint conversion, Tudorica demonstrates stronger pressure handling and excels on Hard courts. Additionally, Tudorica faces tougher opponents, achieving a higher match win percentage overall.
If the match extends to a deciding set, Tudorica has the advantage, having a better track record in those circumstances. Considering these factors, Tudorica appears to be the more likely contender to win this upcoming tennis match.
Matt Kuhar vs Alvin Nicholas Tudorica Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Kuhar vs A. N. Tudorica H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 6 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:10:15 | Average Match Time | 1:10:15 |
| 65% (30/46) | 1st Serve % | 47% (22/47) |
| 67% (20/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (13/22) |
| 38% (6/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (11/25) |
| 80% (4/5) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
| 49% (23/47) | Return Points Win % | 43% (20/46) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Kuhar Recent Matches Played
A. N. Tudorica Recent Matches Played

M. Kuhar vs A. N. Tudorica Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 55.85% (105/83) | YTD Win/Loss | 62.77% (86/51) |
| 55.56% (235/188) | Sets Win/Loss | 62.16% (184/112) |
| 52.96% (2075/1843) | Games Win/Loss | 54.82% (1457/1201) |
| 57.34% (82/61) | Hard Win/Loss | 68.60% (59/27) |
| 44.44% (8/10) | Clay Win/Loss | 48.39% (15/16) |
| 56.00% (14/11) | Indoor Hard W/L | 60.00% (12/8) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.17 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 326 | Aces Total | 96 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.22 |
| 409 | Total Double Faults | 282 |
| 1:5:35 | Average Match Time | 1:18:13 |
| 406.9 | Average Opponent Rank | 372.95 |
| 63% (4734/7505) | 1st Serve % | 65% (4313/6654) |
| 65% (3058/4734) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (2797/4313) |
| 46% (1284/2771) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (1152/2341) |
| 45% (327/729) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 47% (369/785) |
| 40% (3070/7603) | Return Points Win % | 44% (2890/6513) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 36.36% (4/7) | Challenger W/L | 35.00% (7/13) |
| 57.06% (101/76) | Futures W/L | 68.10% (79/37) |
| 56% (104/187) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (85/135) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (1/1) |
| 50% (17/34) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (10/21) |
| 46% (21/46) | Deciding Set Win % | 45% (10/22) |
| 92% (107/98) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 92% (85/78) |
| 8% (107/9) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 8% (85/7) |
| 9% (81/7) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (52/8) |