Matt Kuhar vs Drew Van Orderlain Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Over the last six months, Drew Van Orderlain has a slight edge in second serve points won at 42.86%, compared to Matt Kuhar's 42.51%. This narrow margin indicates parity in their serving capabilities.
• Return Game Analysis: When returning the opponent’s second serve, Matt Kuhar shows a superior performance, winning 47.77% of points, ahead of Drew Van Orderlain's 42.75%. Similarly, Kuhar has a slight advantage in first serve returns, with 32.05% compared to Van Orderlain's 30.84%.
• Breakpoints Under Pressure: Drew Van Orderlain has been more effective in saving break points recently, saving 44.68% compared to Kuhar's 40.71%. This suggests Van Orderlain could have the edge in crucial moments of the game.
• Match Performance: In the past year, Kuhar has shown a slightly better overall win rate at 47.83% versus Van Orderlain's 43.90%. Could this be an indicator of better form?
• Surface Preferences: Both players have their best records on hard surfaces, with a 48% win rate. However, Kuhar is at his worst on clay, while Van Orderlain struggles on grass, which might be informative if surface conditions play a role.
• Level of Competition: Over the last year, Van Orderlain has faced tougher opponents with an average ranking of 253.22, suggesting he is more battle-tested compared to Kuhar's opponents, who have an average rank of 453.24.
• Deciding Sets: In matches that go to a deciding set, Van Orderlain is markedly better, winning 60% of those sets compared to Kuhar’s 25%. If this match is close, Van Orderlain may have the psychological edge.

Editorial Prediction (October 28, 2025, UTC):

Both players exhibit similar strengths and slight weaknesses. While Drew Van Orderlain has shown slight superiority in second serve performance, Matt Kuhar displays a stronger return game, particularly against the second serve. These small differences highlight areas each player could target with strategic precision.

In high-pressure moments, particularly in saving breakpoints and deciding sets, Van Orderlain appears more resilient and poised. His encounters with more challenging opponents may have better prepared him for intense matches, an advantage that becomes critical in close contests.

The marginal differences in overall win rates may not decisively predict the outcome, but Van Orderlain's ability to perform in deciding sets paired with his experience against higher-ranked players gives him a slight edge. Therefore, based on the recent statistics and trends, Drew Van Orderlain is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming match.