Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Gigante vs Uisung Park Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gigante vs Park analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Gigante vs Uisung Park Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gigante has won 50.25% of points on his second serve, while Park has won 34.62%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gigante, in recent form, has won 51.08% of his opponent's second serve points, while Park has won 52.38%. The same stats for first serve returns are 35.49% and 26.83% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gigante has saved 58.51% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Park has saved 44.44% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gigante has won 60.61% of matches played (W/L 40/ 26), with Park winning 66.67% (W/L 6/ 3) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gigante has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 77% (W/L 40/ 12), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 26% (W/L 7/ 20). Park has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 64% (W/L 98/ 55), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 10/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Gigante has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.31% of matches (W/L 35/ 17), where as Park has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 85.71% of matches (W/L 6/ 1). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gigante winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gigante winning 2 and Park winning 0. The last match between Gigante and Park was at the M15 Sharm ElSheikh, 03-03-2022, Second, Hard with Matteo Gigante getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:46:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gigante and Park have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gigante winning 0 times and Park 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gigante winning 0, and Park 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gigante has played against opponents with an average rank of 296.15 while Park has played against players with an average rank of 201.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gigante has won 64% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Park has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gigante has converted 46.15% of breakpoint opportunities, and Park has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Gigante 1 - 0 Park
139
Rank
139
High
22
Age
L
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
809
Rank
546
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
Form
L
L
W
W
W
W
W
W
L
L
59% (123-84)
Career Total W/L
63% (108-63)
73% (22-8)
YTD W/L
0% (0-1)
$40,215
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Uisung Park |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 2 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:46:0 | 0:46:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 74% (26/35) | 60% (28/47) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (21/26) | 46% (13/28) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 78% (7/9) | 37% (7/19) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 57% (27/47) | 20% (7/35) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-1 |
Stats 
Matteo Gigante
Player
Uisung Park
74%
(
26 of
35)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
1
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
78%
(
7 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
27 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
27
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Gigante | Uisung Park |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 73% (22/8) | 0% (0/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 63% (45/26) | 0% (0/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 55% (356/293) | 32% (6/13) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 86% (18/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (4/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.33 |
| Aces Total | 134 | 3 |
| DFs per game | 0.46 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 145 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:34:41 | 1:17:21 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 255.6 | 426 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1250/2040) | 56% (33/59) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (875/1250) | 61% (20/33) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (400/790) | 35% (9/26) |
| BPs Won% Total | 46% (102/220) | 33% (2/6) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (857/2056) | 35% (22/62) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 40% (2/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 87% (20/3) | 0% (0/1) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (22/30) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 64% (7/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 91% (10/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 94% (17/16) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 6% (17/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 46% (13/6) | 0% (1/0) |
Matteo Gigante Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Aleksandar Kovacevic
Player
Matteo Gigante
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
23 of
51)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
19 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Carballes Baena
Player
Matteo Gigante
56%
(
14 of
25)
1st Serve %
47%
(
18 of
38)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
12 of
18)
73%
(
8 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
5 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
41
Total Points Won
22
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Rudolf Molleker
75%
(
77 of
103)
1st Serve %
66%
(
65 of
98)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
50 of
77)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
49 of
65)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
36%
(
37 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
29 of
98)
95
Total Points Won
106
|
7-6(5) 0-6 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Karim Bennani
60%
(
55 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
51 of
85)
4
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
56%
(
20 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
39 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
80
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Nardi
Player
Matteo Gigante
64%
(
51 of
80)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
26 of
47)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
31 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
39 of
80)
88
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Samuel Vincent Ruggeri
58%
(
53 of
92)
1st Serve %
45%
(
41 of
91)
2
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
7
72%
(
38 of
53)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
41%
(
16 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
41%
(
38 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
95
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Benjamin Bonzi
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
51%
(
24 of
47)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Mikhail Kukushkin
Player
Matteo Gigante
52%
(
13 of
25)
1st Serve %
79%
(
27 of
34)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
77%
(
10 of
13)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
7 of
25)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
38
Total Points Won
21
|
6-2 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Bu Yunchaokete
66%
(
77 of
116)
1st Serve %
64%
(
69 of
108)
7
Aces
10
11
Double Faults
3
62%
(
48 of
77)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
43 of
69)
44%
(
17 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
44%
(
51 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
108)
110
Total Points Won
114
|
1-6 7-6(0) 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Alejandro Moro Canas
64%
(
47 of
74)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
83%
(
5 of
6)
43%
(
32 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
83)
82
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Uisung Park Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Yanki Erel
Player
Uisung Park
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve %
56%
(
33 of
59)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
73%
(
30 of
41)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
30 of
59)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Rimpei Kawakami
Player
Uisung Park
65%
(
28 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
38 of
58)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
23 of
38)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
27 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Yunseok Jang
45%
(
26 of
58)
1st Serve %
52%
(
41 of
79)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
43%
(
25 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
42 of
79)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F | 6-3 7-5 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Takuya Kumasaka
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
4
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
32 of
60)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Yunseong Chung
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
26 of
49)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
34%
(
18 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
38 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(1) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Taisei Ichikawa
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
62%
(
43 of
69)
8
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
12 of
26)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
17%
(
2 of
12)
39%
(
29 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
36 of
69)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Uisung Park
Player
Kenta Miyoshi
46%
(
27 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
45 of
77)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
27 of
45)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
18 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jordan Thompson
Player
Uisung Park
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
48%
(
44 of
92)
7
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
1
91%
(
30 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
15 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
45 of
92)
98
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Uisung Park
57%
(
21 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
24 of
42)
6
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
17 of
21)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
35%
(
13 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
42
Total Points Won
37
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
view more
Gigante Vs Park Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
