Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matteo Trevisan vs Pirmin Haenle Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Trevisan vs Haenle analysis and find out who is favored!
Matteo Trevisan vs Pirmin Haenle Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Trevisan has won 0% of points on his second serve, while Haenle has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Trevisan, in recent form, has won 0% of his opponent's second serve points, while Haenle has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Trevisan has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Haenle has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Trevisan has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Haenle winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Trevisan has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 61% (W/L 19/ 12), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 38% (W/L 6/ 10). Haenle has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 28/ 41), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 98/ 146).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Trevisan winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Trevisan winning 4 and Haenle winning 0. The last match between Trevisan and Haenle was at the Italy F3, 24-02-2014, Second, Carpet with Matteo Trevisan getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Trevisan and Haenle have played a deciding set 0 times, with Trevisan winning 0 times and Haenle 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Trevisan winning 0, and Haenle 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Trevisan has played against opponents with an average rank of while Haenle has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Trevisan has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Haenle has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Trevisan has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Haenle has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Trevisan 2 - 0 Haenle
Ret.
Rank
267
High
34
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
2
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
661
High
35
Age
Plays
W
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
58% (220-159)
Career Total W/L
41% (191-277)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$6,640
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matteo Trevisan | Pirmin Haenle |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 25 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-5 | |||||
| 6-3 6-4 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matteo Trevisan | Pirmin Haenle |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matteo Trevisan Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats 
Igor Smilansky
Player
Matteo Trevisan
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve %
71%
(
40 of
56)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
100%
(
4 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
21 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Tommaso Metti
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
0
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
5
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
14 of
23)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
6 of
25)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
18 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Igor Sijsling
Player
Matteo Trevisan
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
84%
(
87 of
104)
5
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
46 of
87)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
47 of
104)
95
Total Points Won
87
|
6-2 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Walter Trusendi
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
19 of
47)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Goncalo Falcao
Player
Matteo Trevisan
53%
(
45 of
85)
1st Serve %
56%
(
51 of
91)
3
Aces
4
7
Double Faults
6
67%
(
30 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
45%
(
38 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
41 of
91)
88
Total Points Won
88
|
6-2 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gianluca Di Nicola
Player
Matteo Trevisan
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
63%
(
58 of
92)
1
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
35 of
58)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
21%
(
5 of
24)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
43 of
92)
86
Total Points Won
71
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Hugo Grenier
63%
(
40 of
64)
1st Serve %
68%
(
53 of
78)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
80%
(
32 of
40)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
38 of
53)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
7 of
25)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
30%
(
19 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
33 of
78)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Alessandro Bega
56%
(
50 of
89)
1st Serve %
66%
(
57 of
86)
8
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
34 of
57)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
42%
(
37 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
86)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
3-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Edward Corrie
65%
(
57 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
7
Aces
7
2
Double Faults
2
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
91
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matteo Trevisan
Player
Antonio Massara
60%
(
49 of
81)
1st Serve %
65%
(
70 of
107)
4
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
3
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
66%
(
21 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
31%
(
25 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
101
Total Points Won
87
|
4-6 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Pirmin Haenle Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Dane Propoggia
Player
Pirmin Haenle
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
33 of
48)
38%
(
8 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
29 of
77)
75
Total Points Won
68
|
7-6(0) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Brydan Klein
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
43 of
77)
10
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
7
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
27 of
43)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
15 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
34 of
77)
77
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Ruikai Wang
59%
(
73 of
123)
1st Serve %
50%
(
56 of
112)
6
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
75%
(
55 of
73)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
31 of
56)
50%
(
25 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
33 of
56)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
35%
(
43 of
123)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
48 of
112)
128
Total Points Won
107
|
6-2 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tejas Chaukulkar
Player
Pirmin Haenle
62%
(
54 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
59 of
98)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
10
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
41 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
21%
(
4 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
34%
(
30 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
98)
97
Total Points Won
88
|
6-3 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
56%
(
46 of
82)
7
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
82)
80
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Prajnesh Gunneswaran
Player
Pirmin Haenle
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve %
39%
(
27 of
69)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
9
81%
(
13 of
16)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
85%
(
11 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
12 of
42)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
17%
(
5 of
29)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
69)
65
Total Points Won
33
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Suraj R Prabodh
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
56%
(
44 of
79)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
11 of
35)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
40 of
79)
77
Total Points Won
60
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Anirudh Chandrasekar
51%
(
23 of
45)
1st Serve %
57%
(
26 of
46)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
23 of
46)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
N. Vijay Sundar Prashanth
Player
Pirmin Haenle
59%
(
51 of
87)
1st Serve %
61%
(
60 of
98)
10
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
42%
(
15 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
13 of
38)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
60%
(
6 of
10)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
52 of
98)
98
Total Points Won
87
|
6-1 2-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pirmin Haenle
Player
Mateusz Terczynski
52%
(
32 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
4
66%
(
21 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
44%
(
27 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
70)
73
Total Points Won
59
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Trevisan Vs Haenle Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
