Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Charles Broom Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romios vs Broom analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Charles Broom Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romios has won 49.39% of points on his second serve, while Broom has won 54%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romios, in recent form, has won 41.48% of his opponent's second serve points, while Broom has won 54.14%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.1% and 31.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romios has saved 51.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Broom has saved 64.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romios has won 40% of matches played (W/L 8/ 12), with Broom winning 54.79% (W/L 40/ 33) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 52/ 74). Broom has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 44/ 22), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 59% (W/L 52/ 36).
- Player level: In the last year, Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 28.57% of matches (W/L 4/ 10), where as Broom has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 59.46% of matches (W/L 22/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Romios winning 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Romios winning 0 and Broom winning 2. The last match between Romios and Broom was at the M15 Heraklion, 24-11-2021, First, Hard with Charles Broom getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:14:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romios and Broom have played a deciding set 0 times, with Romios winning 0 times and Broom 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Romios winning 0, and Broom 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 303.5 while Broom has played against players with an average rank of 207.62.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romios has won 40% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Broom has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romios has converted 33.33% of breakpoint opportunities, and Broom has converted 39.68% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Romios 0 - 1 Broom
889
Rank
563
High
25
Age
R
Plays
0
Total1
0
Hard1
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
339
Rank
322
High
25
Age
R
Plays
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
W
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
L
44% (91-114)
Career Total W/L
63% (196-116)
20% (1-4)
YTD W/L
52% (11-10)
$0
Career Prize Money
$36,000
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 0 | 1 |
| Sets Won | 0 | 2 |
| Games Won | 5 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 3 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 1 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:14:0 | 1:14:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (32/51) | 71% (39/55) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 59% (19/32) | 74% (29/39) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (9/19) | 69% (11/16) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 43% (3/7) |
| Return Points W% | 27% (15/55) | 45% (23/51) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-3 |
Stats 
Charles Broom
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
32 of
51)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Charles Broom |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 20% (1/4) | 52% (11/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 18% (2/9) | 51% (26/25) |
| Games Win/Loss | 37% (36/62) | 50% (247/251) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 50% (4/4) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 54% (7/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.89 | 0.6 |
| Aces Total | 42 | 147 |
| DFs per game | 0.15 | 0.26 |
| DFs Total | 7 | 62 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:16:9 | 1:55:39 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 417.8 | 138.76 |
| 1st Serve % | 64% (195/303) | 63% (983/1559) |
| 1st Serve W% | 65% (126/195) | 71% (695/983) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 44% (48/108) | 53% (308/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 29% (4/14) | 34% (52/155) |
| Return Pts W% | 28% (83/295) | 39% (649/1684) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 20% (1/4) | 45% (5/6) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (6/4) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 20% (1/5) | 52% (11/21) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 67% (6/9) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 56% (5/9) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 80% (10/8) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 20% (10/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (4/0) | 27% (11/3) |
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
2
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Ezekiel Clark
74%
(
53 of
72)
1st Serve %
71%
(
57 of
80)
24
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
7
85%
(
45 of
53)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
43 of
57)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
25%
(
18 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
81
Total Points Won
71
|
6-3 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Charles Broom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Adam Walton
Player
Charles Broom
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
63%
(
25 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
19 of
41)
33%
(
5 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
37 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Nishesh Basavareddy
Player
Charles Broom
59%
(
61 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
54 of
89)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
4
72%
(
44 of
61)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
31 of
54)
40%
(
17 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
18 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
40 of
89)
101
Total Points Won
91
|
6-0 5-7 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Kyle Kang
70%
(
62 of
88)
1st Serve %
53%
(
39 of
74)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
47%
(
41 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
36 of
74)
83
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Quinn Vandecasteele
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
58%
(
47 of
81)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
38 of
81)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cash Hanzlik
Player
Charles Broom
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
38 of
57)
1st Serve Won
86%
(
36 of
42)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
32 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
21 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
82
|
2-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Kiranpal Pannu
Player
Charles Broom
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
18 of
38)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
42%
(
31 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
77
Total Points Won
64
|
6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Lukas Pokorny
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
41 of
64)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
38 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
100
Total Points Won
95
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Victor Lilov
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve %
60%
(
35 of
58)
6
Aces
3
7
Double Faults
4
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
21 of
35)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
21 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Elmar Ejupovic
Player
Charles Broom
65%
(
42 of
65)
1st Serve %
69%
(
40 of
58)
4
Aces
9
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
34 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
35%
(
8 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
64
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Charles Broom
Player
Aidan Mchugh
65%
(
60 of
93)
1st Serve %
68%
(
73 of
107)
14
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
56 of
73)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
29%
(
27 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
40 of
107)
106
Total Points Won
94
|
4-6 6-2 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
view more
Romios Vs Broom Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
