Matthew Christopher Romios vs Daniel Paty Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romios vs Paty analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Daniel Paty Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romios has won 52.42% of points on his second serve, while Paty has won 46.15%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romios, in recent form, has won 40.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paty has won 46.15%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.05% and 28.02% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romios has saved 55.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paty has saved 67.86% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romios has won 36.84% of matches played (W/L 7/ 12), with Paty winning 57.78% (W/L 26/ 19) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 51/ 73). Paty has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 57% (W/L 90/ 68), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 35% (W/L 6/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9), where as Paty has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.78% of matches (W/L 26/ 19). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Romios winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Romios winning 2 and Paty winning 0. The last match between Romios and Paty was at the M25 Wetzlar, 03-08-2021, Q3, Clay with Matthew Christopher Romios getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:32:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romios and Paty have played a deciding set 0 times, with Romios winning 0 times and Paty 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Romios winning 0, and Paty 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.47 while Paty has played against players with an average rank of 137.53.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romios has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paty has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romios has converted 28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paty has converted 26.09% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Romios 1 - 0 Paty
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
889
Rank
563
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
690
Rank
664
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
44% (90-113)
Career Total W/L
53% (104-92)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Daniel Paty |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 9 |
Aces (Total) | 1 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
Avg Match Time | 1:32:0 | 1:32:0 |
1st Serve % | 60% (37/62) | 69% (46/67) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (28/37) | 67% (31/46) |
2nd Serve Win% | 64% (16/25) | 52% (11/21) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 25% (1/4) |
Return Points W% | 37% (25/67) | 29% (18/62) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-5 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Daniel Paty
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
1
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
31 of
46)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
67)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Daniel Paty |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 30% (16/38) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.46 | 0 |
Aces Total | 12 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.08 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:21 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 379.67 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (109/177) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (60/109) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (32/68) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 11% (1/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 26% (45/170) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leonid Sheyngezikht
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
52 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Daniel Paty Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Adrian Bodmer
Player
Daniel Paty
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
1
Aces
9
6
Double Faults
7
71%
(
35 of
49)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
29 of
42)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
27 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
30 of
70)
77
Total Points Won
67
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Martin Landaluce
Player
Daniel Paty
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve %
65%
(
39 of
60)
4
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
2
77%
(
30 of
39)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
55%
(
17 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
21 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
David Poljak
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
61 of
97)
9
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
74%
(
35 of
47)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
29%
(
21 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
41 of
97)
93
Total Points Won
77
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dali Blanch
Player
Daniel Paty
46%
(
33 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
51 of
93)
7
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
88%
(
29 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
39 of
51)
58%
(
22 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
20 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
38 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
3-6 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Eric Vanshelboim
Player
Daniel Paty
79%
(
68 of
86)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
87)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
4
60%
(
41 of
68)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
30 of
55)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
44%
(
38 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
45 of
87)
93
Total Points Won
80
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
57%
(
21 of
37)
5
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
91%
(
21 of
23)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
12 of
21)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
20%
(
8 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
53
Total Points Won
24
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
26 of
42)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
9 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
58
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Paty
Player
Matei Cristian Onofrei
58%
(
33 of
57)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
18 of
30)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
66
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Juan Bautista Torres
Player
Daniel Paty
62%
(
58 of
93)
1st Serve %
46%
(
58 of
126)
2
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
7
74%
(
43 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
43 of
58)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
35%
(
33 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
57 of
126)
117
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more