Matthew Christopher Romios vs Mick Veldheer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Romios vs Veldheer analysis and find out who is favored!
Matthew Christopher Romios vs Mick Veldheer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Romios has won 52.42% of points on his second serve, while Veldheer has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Romios, in recent form, has won 40.4% of his opponent's second serve points, while Veldheer has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.05% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Romios has saved 55.17% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Veldheer has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Romios has won 36.84% of matches played (W/L 7/ 12), with Veldheer winning 22.22% (W/L 2/ 7) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Romios has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 60% (W/L 9/ 6), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 51/ 73). Veldheer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 58% (W/L 38/ 28), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 128/ 112).
- Player level: In the last year, Romios has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 3/ 9), where as Veldheer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 25% of matches (W/L 2/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Romios winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Romios winning 1 and Veldheer winning 4. The last match between Romios and Veldheer was at the M25 Quinta Do Lago, 20-10-2021, First, Hard with Mick Veldheer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:30.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Romios and Veldheer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Romios winning 0 times and Veldheer 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Romios winning 0, and Veldheer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Romios has played against opponents with an average rank of 269.47 while Veldheer has played against players with an average rank of 186.56.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Romios has won 25% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Veldheer has won 33% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Romios has converted 28% of breakpoint opportunities, and Veldheer has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Romios 0 - 2 Veldheer
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
889
Rank
563
High
24
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard1
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
882
Rank
509
High
27
Age
L
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
44% (90-113)
Career Total W/L
55% (229-191)
0% (0-3)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Mick Veldheer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 10 | 28 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 2 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:30 | 1:28:30 |
1st Serve % | 57% (66/115) | 66% (77/117) |
1st Serve Win% | 58% (38/66) | 77% (59/77) |
2nd Serve Win% | 31% (15/49) | 53% (21/40) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (2/4) | 56% (10/18) |
Return Points W% | 32% (37/117) | 54% (62/115) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 4-6 6-1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
79)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
26 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
37 of
79)
88
Total Points Won
68
|
||||
6-1 6-0 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
65%
(
26 of
40)
1st Serve %
53%
(
19 of
36)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
20 of
26)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
54
Total Points Won
22
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Matthew Christopher Romios | Mick Veldheer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/6) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 30% (16/38) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.46 | 0 |
Aces Total | 12 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.08 | 0 |
DFs Total | 2 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:13:21 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 379.67 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 62% (109/177) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 55% (60/109) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (32/68) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 11% (1/9) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 26% (45/170) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (3/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Matthew Christopher Romios Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Nikolas Sanchez-Izquierdo
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
27 of
48)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
31%
(
15 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
29 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
34
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Shintaro Imai
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
37 of
62)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
88%
(
30 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
73
Total Points Won
49
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
42 of
61)
1st Serve %
67%
(
45 of
67)
11
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
QF |
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
80%
(
70 of
87)
1st Serve %
57%
(
54 of
94)
2
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
47 of
70)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
35 of
54)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
23 of
40)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
32%
(
28 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
36 of
94)
95
Total Points Won
86
|
7-6(3) 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Thomas Fancutt
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
23 of
39)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
12 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
46
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Stefanos Sakellaridis
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
74%
(
14 of
19)
1st Serve %
62%
(
13 of
21)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
9 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
3 of
19)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
25
Total Points Won
15
|
5-2 ret. | H2H | ||
QF |
Tao Mu
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve %
62%
(
29 of
47)
3
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
0
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
19 of
29)
91%
(
10 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
11%
(
4 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Colin Sinclair
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
64%
(
35 of
55)
12
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
1
78%
(
28 of
36)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
27 of
35)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
26%
(
14 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
23 of
55)
62
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Leonid Sheyngezikht
Player
Matthew Christopher Romios
67%
(
57 of
85)
1st Serve %
61%
(
64 of
105)
1
Aces
11
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
52 of
64)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
14 of
41)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
30 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
39 of
105)
94
Total Points Won
96
|
6-4 3-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Matthew Christopher Romios
Player
Evgeny Karlovskiy
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
45 of
61)
8
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
28 of
61)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Mick Veldheer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 |
Marvin Moeller
Player
Mick Veldheer
66%
(
51 of
77)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
5
69%
(
35 of
51)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
13 of
34)
53%
(
8 of
15)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
40%
(
31 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
79)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Henri Squire
Player
Mick Veldheer
55%
(
70 of
128)
1st Serve %
55%
(
74 of
135)
13
Aces
5
8
Double Faults
12
70%
(
49 of
70)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
52 of
74)
60%
(
35 of
58)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
36%
(
4 of
11)
34%
(
44 of
128)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
53 of
135)
137
Total Points Won
126
|
6-7(7) 6-3 7-6(13) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Philip Florig
Player
Mick Veldheer
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
52 of
72)
3
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
23 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
29 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Lukas Neumayer
Player
Mick Veldheer
77%
(
43 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
28 of
45)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
2
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Mick Veldheer
50%
(
38 of
76)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
2
61%
(
23 of
38)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
31%
(
4 of
13)
47%
(
36 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
35 of
64)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mick Veldheer
Player
Timofey Stepanov
63%
(
43 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
40 of
73)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
30 of
43)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
27 of
40)
52%
(
13 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
73)
75
Total Points Won
66
|
6-3 1-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Giovanni Oradini
Player
Mick Veldheer
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
47 of
80)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
67%
(
28 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
29 of
47)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
38 of
80)
77
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Gian Matias Di Natale
Player
Mick Veldheer
57%
(
31 of
54)
1st Serve %
72%
(
49 of
68)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
32 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-0 6-0 | H2H | |||
QF |
Aleksandr Bulitski
Player
Mick Veldheer
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
69%
(
45 of
65)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
30 of
45)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
4-6 6-2 10-7 | H2H |
view more