Matthew Forbes vs Kaylan Bigun Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Oct at 07:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Forbes vs K. Bigun

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Forbes 1 - 0 Bigun
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matthew Forbes winning 2 and Kaylan Bigun winning 0. The last match between Matthew Forbes and Kaylan Bigun was at the M25 Norman, 24-10-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Matthew Forbes getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Forbes | 1 |
| Bigun | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Norman(10-24-25)
M. Forbes vs K. Bigun H2H Profile
M. Forbes vs K. Bigun Match Preview:
- How do second serve performances compare in recent form? Matthew Forbes has won 40.09% of points on his second serve, slightly lower than Kaylan Bigun's 41.67%.
- In terms of returning games, which player is currently showing stronger stats? Kaylan Bigun edges out with a 48.32% win rate on opponent's second serve points, compared to Matthew Forbes' 45.51%.
- What about first serve return success? Here too, Kaylan Bigun leads with 24.62%, above Forbes' 21.14%.
- Who performs better under pressure? Forbes has an advantage, saving 54.05% of breakpoints, against Bigun's 48.54%.
- When it comes to overall match wins in the past year, Forbes holds a slight edge, winning 50% of his matches, whereas Bigun has a 44.83% win rate.
- Examining surface preferences, Forbes excels on hard courts with a 60% win rate, while Bigun shares the same percentage on clay.
- Player level and opponent quality signify that Bigun has been competing against tougher opponents, averaging a rank of 218.97 compared to Forbes’ opponents with a rank of 404.64.
- If the match goes to a deciding set, Forbes has a perfect track record, winning 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, in contrast to Bigun's 38%.
- Event-specific performance is crucial; recent play in a current event can offer insight into a player's form.
Editorial Prediction (October 24, 2025, UTC):
When predicting outcomes in tennis matches, various factors such as second serve effectiveness, return statistics, and performance under pressure are critical.
Recent data indicates Kaylan Bigun has a slight edge in returning serve performance, both first and second, which could play a decisive role. However, Matthew Forbes excels in handling high-pressure situations and shows strong nerve with a higher breakpoint save percentage.
Although Bigun has faced tougher opponents over the past year, Forbes' favorable odds in deciding sets may prove pivotal if the match extends to a close finish. The surface does not offer a significant edge as both players show distinct preferences, with Forbes favoring hard courts.
Based on the analysis, while Kaylan Bigun has demonstrated stronger return statistics, Matthew Forbes’ penchant for clutch performances might give him the likely advantage, suggesting Forbes could emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Matthew Forbes vs Kaylan Bigun Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Forbes vs K. Bigun H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 7 |
| 11 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:18:29 | Average Match Time | 1:18:29 |
| 59% (32/54) | 1st Serve % | 63% (34/54) |
| 88% (28/32) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (24/34) |
| 68% (15/22) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (11/20) |
| 50% (2/4) | Break Pts Won % | 0% (0/0) |
| 35% (19/54) | Return Points Win % | 20% (11/54) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Forbes Recent Matches Played
K. Bigun Recent Matches Played

M. Forbes vs K. Bigun Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (12/12) | YTD Win/Loss | 36.11% (26/46) |
| 46.30% (25/29) | Sets Win/Loss | 40.24% (66/98) |
| 50.81% (252/244) | Games Win/Loss | 46.45% (727/838) |
| 61.54% (8/5) | Hard Win/Loss | 35.90% (14/25) |
| 37.50% (3/5) | Clay Win/Loss | 39.13% (9/14) |
| 33.33% (1/2) | Indoor Hard W/L | 30.00% (3/7) |
| 0.39 | Aces Per Game | 0.32 |
| 93 | Aces Total | 249 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.42 |
| 80 | Total Double Faults | 321 |
| 1:19:9 | Average Match Time | 1:38:1 |
| 435.63 | Average Opponent Rank | 453.78 |
| 58% (710/1215) | 1st Serve % | 55% (2549/4664) |
| 68% (486/710) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (1694/2549) |
| 47% (236/505) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (979/2115) |
| 40% (38/96) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (180/464) |
| 37% (408/1108) | Return Points Win % | 39% (1820/4659) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Challenger W/L | 34.48% (10/19) |
| 54.55% (12/10) | Futures W/L | 38.10% (16/26) |
| 52% (12/23) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 37% (26/70) |
| 0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 39% (9/23) |
| 80% (4/5) | Deciding Set Win % | 33% (6/18) |
| 91% (11/10) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (33/22) |
| 9% (11/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (33/11) |
| 15% (13/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 10% (39/4) |