Mattia Bellucci vs Ryan Nijboer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bellucci vs Nijboer analysis and find out who is favored!
Mattia Bellucci vs Ryan Nijboer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bellucci has won 48.98% of points on his second serve, while Nijboer has won 48.87%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bellucci, in recent form, has won 47.05% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nijboer has won 53.65%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.41% and 35.66% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bellucci has saved 56.1% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nijboer has saved 56.28% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bellucci has won 48.53% of matches played (W/L 33/ 35), with Nijboer winning 62.64% (W/L 57/ 34) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bellucci has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 68% (W/L 103/ 49), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 53% (W/L 26/ 23). Nijboer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 93/ 64), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 24% (W/L 4/ 13).
- Player level: In the last year, Bellucci has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 30/ 30), where as Nijboer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.92% of matches (W/L 51/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bellucci winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Bellucci winning 2 and Nijboer winning 0. The last match between Bellucci and Nijboer was at the M15 Sharm El Sheikh, 03-04-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Mattia Bellucci getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:36:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bellucci and Nijboer have played a deciding set 0 times, with Bellucci winning 0 times and Nijboer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Bellucci winning 1, and Nijboer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bellucci has played against opponents with an average rank of 290.25 while Nijboer has played against players with an average rank of 156.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bellucci has won 44% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nijboer has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bellucci has converted 37.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nijboer has converted 46.01% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Bellucci 1 - 0 Nijboer
9
Total
0
Mast
3
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
180
Rank
142
High
22
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
484
Rank
437
High
24
Age
R
Plays
3
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
63% (189-113)
Career Total W/L
57% (214-164)
33% (6-12)
YTD W/L
55% (12-10)
$171,445
Career Prize Money
$5,735
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mattia Bellucci | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 13 | 10 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 1 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:36:0 | 1:36:0 |
1st Serve % | 54% (33/61) | 75% (52/69) |
1st Serve Win% | 82% (27/33) | 56% (29/52) |
2nd Serve Win% | 61% (17/28) | 65% (11/17) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 50% (2/4) |
Return Points W% | 42% (29/69) | 28% (17/61) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
7-6(3) 6-4 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Ryan Nijboer
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
75%
(
52 of
69)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
29 of
52)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
28%
(
17 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
29 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mattia Bellucci | Ryan Nijboer |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 33% (6/12) | 55% (12/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 39% (16/25) | 57% (29/22) |
Games Win/Loss | 47% (188/213) | 54% (263/222) |
Hard Win/Loss | 17% (1/5) | 73% (8/3) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (4/4) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 42% (5/7) | 0% (0/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.58 | 0.44 |
Aces Total | 113 | 103 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.39 |
DFs Total | 37 | 91 |
Avg Match Time | 1:41:2 | 1:50:58 |
Avg Opp Rank | 313.78 | 207.32 |
1st Serve % | 63% (766/1217) | 58% (864/1496) |
1st Serve W% | 71% (543/766) | 71% (612/864) |
2nd Serve W% | 50% (226/451) | 50% (317/632) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (33/89) | 46% (81/178) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (425/1250) | 43% (665/1563) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 31% (5/11) | 17% (1/5) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 69% (11/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 35% (6/17) | 55% (12/22) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 29% (2/7) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 29% (2/7) |
1st set W, W | 60% (10/6) | 77% (13/10) |
1st set W, L | 40% (10/4) | 23% (13/3) |
1st set L, W | 0% (8/0) | 22% (9/2) |
Mattia Bellucci Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Philip Sekulic
Player
Mattia Bellucci
61%
(
46 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
26 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
0-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Soon-Woo Kwon
Player
Mattia Bellucci
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
65)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
7
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
38%
(
20 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
33 of
65)
65
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Mattia Bellucci
78%
(
73 of
93)
1st Serve %
65%
(
52 of
80)
7
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
53 of
73)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
37 of
52)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
13%
(
1 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
9)
34%
(
32 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
29 of
80)
90
Total Points Won
83
|
6-4 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Marko Topo
65%
(
45 of
69)
1st Serve %
75%
(
40 of
53)
9
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
1
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
19 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Hady Habib
54%
(
33 of
61)
1st Serve %
62%
(
40 of
65)
8
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
1
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
28 of
65)
69
Total Points Won
57
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Billy Harris
Player
Mattia Bellucci
65%
(
69 of
106)
1st Serve %
64%
(
63 of
99)
5
Aces
24
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
53 of
69)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
47 of
63)
54%
(
20 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
31%
(
33 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
32 of
99)
105
Total Points Won
100
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Mattia Bellucci
74%
(
67 of
90)
1st Serve %
69%
(
59 of
86)
13
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
2
79%
(
53 of
67)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
15 of
27)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
22 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
30%
(
26 of
86)
94
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Pierre-Hugues Herbert
61%
(
31 of
51)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
4
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
15 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
29 of
63)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mattia Bellucci
Player
Matteo Martineau
64%
(
47 of
73)
1st Serve %
67%
(
46 of
69)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
32 of
47)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
73%
(
19 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
75
Total Points Won
67
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more
Ryan Nijboer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Matteo De Vincentis
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
43 of
71)
1
Aces
0
7
Double Faults
3
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
45%
(
33 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
34 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Alexander Zgirovsky
61%
(
20 of
33)
1st Serve %
64%
(
25 of
39)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
90%
(
18 of
20)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
77%
(
10 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
53
Total Points Won
19
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Marc-Andrea Huesler
Player
Ryan Nijboer
46%
(
53 of
116)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
6
Aces
11
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
43 of
61)
54%
(
34 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
36%
(
42 of
116)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
35 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
101
|
6-7(5) 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Oleksii Krutykh
Player
Ryan Nijboer
71%
(
53 of
75)
1st Serve %
75%
(
57 of
76)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
62%
(
8 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
43%
(
32 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
42 of
76)
85
Total Points Won
66
|
6-2 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Robert Strombachs
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
22 of
44)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
22 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
27 of
44)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Marko Topo
Player
Ryan Nijboer
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
65%
(
45 of
69)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
45%
(
34 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
31 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Hernan Casanova
Player
Ryan Nijboer
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
0
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
7
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
33 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
43
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Dali Blanch
57%
(
37 of
65)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
1
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
5
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
35%
(
23 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
58
|
3-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Ryan Nijboer
72%
(
60 of
83)
1st Serve %
60%
(
61 of
102)
2
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
4
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
45 of
61)
43%
(
10 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
16 of
41)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
41 of
102)
92
Total Points Won
93
|
6-4 2-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cyril Vandermeersch
Player
Ryan Nijboer
55%
(
58 of
106)
1st Serve %
50%
(
55 of
109)
5
Aces
7
7
Double Faults
4
81%
(
47 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
42 of
55)
52%
(
25 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
35 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
108
|
4-6 7-5 7-6(5) | H2H |
view more