Matyas Fuele vs Sebastian Fanselow Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 24 Oct at 11:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Fuele vs S. Fanselow

HUN
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Fuele 1 - 0 Fanselow
They have played 2 sets in total, with Matyas Fuele winning 2 and Sebastian Fanselow winning 0. The last match between Matyas Fuele and Sebastian Fanselow was at the M25 Sintra, 24-10-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Matyas Fuele getting the victory 6-4 7-6(5).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Fuele | 1 |
| Fanselow | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Sintra(10-24-25)
M. Fuele vs S. Fanselow H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $3,105 |
| 62.39% (141-85) | Career Total W/L | 58.69% (375-264) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 2 | Titles | 12 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Fuele vs S. Fanselow Match Preview:
- Second Serve Success: Sebastian Fanselow has recently won 45.57% of points on his second serve, slightly outperforming Matyas Fuele, who has won 44.16%. Does this slight edge offer a significant advantage? It indicates a modest superiority in serving under pressure.
- Return Game Comparison: Fanselow captures 41.72% of opponents' second serve points, whereas Fuele is more effective, securing 49.03%. How might this influence the match outcome? Fuele's superior return game could prove vital in securing crucial points.
- First Serve Return Edge: When returning first serves, Fuele holds a narrow lead over Fanselow with a 27.29% success rate compared to 26.95% for Fanselow. Can this slight difference alter match dynamics? Possibly, in tightly contested games.
- Pressure Handling: Fanselow excels in saving breakpoints, with a 57.81% success rate versus Fuele's 47.33%. How crucial is this in critical moments? It could mean Fanselow maintains composure better under pressure.
- Overall Match Performance: Over the past year, Fuele has been more consistent, winning 67.74% of his matches compared to Fanselow's 37.50%. Does this signify who is stronger overall? It suggests Fuele's stronger form coming into this match.
- Surface Preferences: Both players have their best statistics on Hard courts, each with a 62% win rate. Could surface familiarity tilt the scales? It may level the playing field, as both excel on this surface.
- Level of Competition: Fuele's opponents typically rank higher (average rank: 412.94), compared to Fanselow's (average rank: 509.88). How does opponent quality reflect on each player’s readiness? It suggests Fuele has been tested against stronger competition.
- Deciding Set Resilience: In deciding sets, Fuele has a 44% win rate, exceeding Fanselow's 33%. This statistic might matter in a closely disputed match.
- Event Level Experience: Over the past year, Fuele has performed better in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, winning 67.74% of matches, in contrast to Fanselow's 36.84%. Is previous performance at this level a clear indicator? It positions Fuele as more experienced and potentially more comfortable in this setting.
Editorial Prediction (October 24, 2025, UTC):
In approaching this match, several critical statistics come to light that could determine its outcome. While Fanselow has a slight advantage in second serve performance and breakpoints saved, Fuele's superior return game and consistent past performance provide him with a competitive edge.
Match play statistics reveal Fuele's stronger form entering the current year, suggesting greater consistency and success in maintaining winning momentum. His experience against higher-ranked opponents and his capability in deciding sets offer additional advantages.
Considering both players excel on Hard courts, the surface may not provide a clear advantage to either. However, Fuele's success in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments and higher level of competition might give him a slight overall edge.
Based on available facts and trends, Matyas Fuele appears to be the likely winner in this forthcoming clash, offering strength in returns and recent match consistency as determining factors.
Matyas Fuele vs Sebastian Fanselow Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Fuele vs S. Fanselow H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 10 |
| 7 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 3 | Total Double Faults | 6 |
| 2:12:45 | Average Match Time | 2:12:45 |
| 67% (56/83) | 1st Serve % | 56% (44/78) |
| 64% (36/56) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (26/44) |
| 52% (14/27) | 2nd Serve Win % | 41% (14/34) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 29% (4/14) |
| 49% (38/78) | Return Points Win % | 40% (33/83) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Fuele Recent Matches Played
S. Fanselow Recent Matches Played

M. Fuele vs S. Fanselow Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62.39% (141/85) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.69% (375/264) |
| 59.77% (309/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.22% (844/631) |
| 53.17% (2657/2340) | Games Win/Loss | 53.03% (7350/6511) |
| 67.86% (38/18) | Hard Win/Loss | 62.05% (206/126) |
| 60.59% (103/67) | Clay Win/Loss | 56.28% (130/101) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 52.00% (39/36) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0.21 | Aces Per Game | 0.27 |
| 507 | Aces Total | 1837 |
| 0.22 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 529 | Total Double Faults | 1989 |
| 1:18:55 | Average Match Time | 1:30:12 |
| 416.37 | Average Opponent Rank | 525.34 |
| 61% (7258/11987) | 1st Serve % | 59% (22827/38581) |
| 66% (4764/7258) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (15810/22827) |
| 49% (2322/4728) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (7750/15753) |
| 43% (561/1308) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (1760/4117) |
| 42% (5004/11963) | Return Points Win % | 41% (15908/38653) |
| 100.00% (1/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 20.00% (1/4) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Challenger W/L | 48.63% (124/131) |
| 62.78% (140/83) | Futures W/L | 65.96% (250/129) |
| 62% (139/223) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (370/631) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 62% (38/61) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (76/159) |
| 57% (39/68) | Deciding Set Win % | 52% (105/203) |
| 88% (137/121) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 87% (366/318) |
| 12% (137/16) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 13% (366/48) |
| 22% (89/20) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 21% (273/57) |