Max Houkes vs Daniel DE Jonge Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Houkes vs Jonge analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Houkes vs Daniel DE Jonge Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Houkes has won 47.84% of points on his second serve, while Jonge has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Houkes, in recent form, has won 52.43% of his opponent's second serve points, while Jonge has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 37.65% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Houkes has saved 57.84% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Jonge has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Houkes has won 58.9% of matches played (W/L 43/ 30), with Jonge winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Houkes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 200/ 98), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Jonge has their best career surface win % on , winning % (W/L / ), and worse career win % on , winning % (W/L / ).
- Player level: In the last year, Houkes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.65% of matches (W/L 18/ 19), where as Jonge has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Houkes has played against opponents with an average rank of 239.9 while Jonge has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Houkes has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Jonge has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Houkes has converted 46.05% of breakpoint opportunities, and Jonge has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Houkes 0 - 0 Jonge
6
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
24
Age
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
Career Total W/L
YTD W/L
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
YTD Titles
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Max Houkes | Daniel DE Jonge |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 67% (10/5) | N/A |
Sets Win/Loss | 65% (22/12) | N/A |
Games Win/Loss | 55% (174/143) | N/A |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | N/A |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Aces pg | 0.24 | N/A |
Aces Total | 37 | N/A |
DFs per game | 0.35 | N/A |
DFs Total | 55 | N/A |
Avg Match Time | 1:45:8 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 250.07 | N/A |
1st Serve % | 63% (600/950) | N/A |
1st Serve W% | 71% (423/600) | N/A |
2nd Serve W% | 49% (170/350) | N/A |
BPs Won% Total | 44% (41/93) | N/A |
Return Pts W% | 41% (393/957) | N/A |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | N/A |
Futures W/L | 83% (5/1) | N/A |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 67% (10/15) | N/A |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | N/A |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (4/4) | N/A |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (2/4) | N/A |
1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | N/A |
1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | N/A |
1st set L, W | 20% (5/1) | N/A |
Max Houkes Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
R2 |
Max Houkes
Player
Niccolo Catini
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Houkes
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Max Houkes
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
SF |
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Max Houkes
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Max Houkes
Player
Corentin Denolly
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Max Houkes
Player
Preston Brown
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Houkes
Player
Alafia Ayeni
68%
(
60 of
88)
1st Serve %
52%
(
46 of
88)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
16
75%
(
45 of
60)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
16 of
42)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
32%
(
28 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
98
Total Points Won
78
|
6-1 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cezar Cretu
Player
Max Houkes
65%
(
64 of
99)
1st Serve %
62%
(
52 of
84)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
44 of
64)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
54%
(
19 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
36 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
99
Total Points Won
84
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Max Houkes
Player
Giuseppe La Vela
60%
(
50 of
83)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
4
Aces
2
8
Double Faults
2
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
21 of
39)
39%
(
13 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
39%
(
32 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H |
view more
Daniel DE Jonge Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Roland Stuurman
Player
Daniel De Jonge
69%
(
66 of
95)
1st Serve %
53%
(
51 of
97)
3
Aces
3
9
Double Faults
10
64%
(
42 of
66)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
38 of
51)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
17 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
39 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
98
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Constantin Bittoun Kouzmine
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
78)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
33 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
26 of
41)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
37%
(
25 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
36 of
78)
79
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Mohamed Nazim Makhlouf
48%
(
49 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
44 of
72)
1
Aces
1
14
Double Faults
1
69%
(
34 of
49)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
21%
(
3 of
14)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
72)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
6-1 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Massimo Giunta
Player
Daniel De Jonge
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve %
41%
(
21 of
51)
9
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
13 of
21)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
65
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Federico Cina
Player
Daniel De Jonge
54%
(
20 of
37)
1st Serve %
57%
(
31 of
54)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
85%
(
17 of
20)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
53%
(
9 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
22%
(
5 of
23)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
33 of
54)
59
Total Points Won
32
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q2 | 6-3 6-1 | H2H | |||
QF |
Daniel De Jonge
Player
Ignasi Forcano
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
43 of
61)
3
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
2
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
25 of
43)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
37%
(
21 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
61)
63
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Martyn Pawelski
Player
Daniel De Jonge
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
45%
(
37 of
83)
12
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
8
91%
(
32 of
35)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
34 of
83)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Ryan Nijboer
Player
Daniel De Jonge
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
6
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
23 of
32)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
19 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H |
view more