Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Max Houkes vs Matthew Dellavedova Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Houkes vs Dellavedova analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Houkes vs Matthew Dellavedova Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Houkes has won 49.65% of points on his second serve, while Dellavedova has won 53.21%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Houkes, in recent form, has won 51.64% of his opponent's second serve points, while Dellavedova has won 50.96%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.47% and 32.39% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Houkes has saved 57.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Dellavedova has saved 58.91% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Houkes has won 57.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 29), with Dellavedova winning 55.32% (W/L 52/ 42) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Houkes has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 201/ 100), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Dellavedova has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 131/ 104), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 14% (W/L 1/ 6).
- Player level: In the last year, Houkes has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 48.57% of matches (W/L 17/ 18), where as Dellavedova has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 60.56% of matches (W/L 43/ 28). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Houkes winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Houkes winning 4 and Dellavedova winning 0. The last match between Houkes and Dellavedova was at the M15 Kottingbrunn, 04-08-2022, Second, Clay with Max Houkes getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:40:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Houkes and Dellavedova have played a deciding set 0 times, with Houkes winning 0 times and Dellavedova 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Houkes winning 0, and Dellavedova 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Houkes has played against opponents with an average rank of 259.16 while Dellavedova has played against players with an average rank of 233.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Houkes has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Dellavedova has won 61% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Houkes has converted 44.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Dellavedova has converted 39.71% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Houkes 2 - 0 Dellavedova
366
Rank
273
High
23
Age
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
438
Rank
427
High
23
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
Form
L
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
65% (215-117)
Career Total W/L
53% (237-211)
61% (11-7)
YTD W/L
41% (9-13)
$0
Career Prize Money
$3,550
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Houkes VS Dellavedova H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Max Houkes | Matthew Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 24 | 10 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 3 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:40:0 | 0:40:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 53% (26/49) | 47% (24/51) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 85% (22/26) | 67% (16/24) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 57% (13/23) | 41% (11/27) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 67% (4/6) | 100% (1/1) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (24/51) | 29% (14/49) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
Houkes VS Dellavedova H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-2 |
Stats 
Max Houkes
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
53%
(
26 of
49)
1st Serve %
47%
(
24 of
51)
5
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
16 of
24)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
||||
| 6-2 6-2 | |||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Max Houkes | Matthew Dellavedova |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 61% (11/7) | 41% (9/13) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 60% (25/17) | 40% (20/30) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (211/188) | 46% (198/237) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 38% (5/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 61% (11/7) | 44% (4/5) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.25 | 0.12 |
| Aces Total | 49 | 26 |
| DFs per game | 0.35 | 0.2 |
| DFs Total | 69 | 42 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:40 | 1:44:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 269.33 | 275.27 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (767/1258) | 70% (1044/1498) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (537/767) | 59% (621/1044) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 50% (245/491) | 48% (217/454) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (51/120) | 38% (54/141) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (520/1283) | 38% (511/1328) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 56% (5/4) | 30% (3/7) |
| Futures W/L | 67% (6/3) | 50% (5/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 61% (11/18) | 41% (9/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 33% (1/3) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (3/6) | 67% (4/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (10/9) | 90% (10/9) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (10/1) | 10% (10/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (8/2) | 0% (12/0) |
Max Houkes Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Tommaso Compagnucci
Player
Max Houkes
68%
(
39 of
57)
1st Serve %
49%
(
31 of
63)
0
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
61%
(
11 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
34 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
51
|
7-6(5) 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Federico Arnaboldi
55%
(
63 of
114)
1st Serve %
47%
(
63 of
133)
3
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
10
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
43 of
63)
53%
(
27 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
39%
(
44 of
114)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
57 of
133)
127
Total Points Won
120
|
4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Valentin Royer
Player
Max Houkes
65%
(
51 of
79)
1st Serve %
55%
(
39 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
30 of
39)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
26 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
22 of
71)
75
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
57%
(
34 of
60)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
1
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
58%
(
15 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
19 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
22 of
57)
63
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Niccolo Catini
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
33 of
71)
69
Total Points Won
55
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Diego Barreto Sanchez
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
62%
(
37 of
60)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
27 of
37)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
22 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
23 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(9) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mohamed Safwat
Player
Max Houkes
58%
(
32 of
55)
1st Serve %
69%
(
36 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
15 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
20 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Max Houkes
60%
(
49 of
82)
1st Serve %
54%
(
50 of
93)
7
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
6
78%
(
38 of
49)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
51%
(
22 of
43)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
24 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
93)
93
Total Points Won
82
|
4-6 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Corentin Denolly
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
18 of
42)
33%
(
4 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
21 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Max Houkes
Player
Preston Brown
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
36 of
63)
3
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
6
78%
(
31 of
40)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
27 of
36)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Matthew Dellavedova Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Yshai Oliel
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve %
58%
(
39 of
67)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
8
54%
(
21 of
39)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
8 of
12)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
51%
(
27 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
41 of
67)
67
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Francesco Ferrari
73%
(
62 of
85)
1st Serve %
59%
(
48 of
81)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
60%
(
37 of
62)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
65%
(
15 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
39%
(
33 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
81)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Fabrizio Andaloro
59%
(
30 of
51)
1st Serve %
63%
(
27 of
43)
1
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
2
80%
(
24 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
66%
(
33 of
50)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
67%
(
8 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Gabriele Pennaforti
67%
(
97 of
144)
1st Serve %
55%
(
45 of
82)
3
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
5
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
42%
(
61 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
32 of
82)
115
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 6-7(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Johan Nikles
73%
(
55 of
75)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
0
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
1
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
16 of
37)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
10%
(
1 of
10)
37%
(
28 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
73
Total Points Won
53
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Pol Martin Tiffon
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
51%
(
30 of
59)
1st Serve %
64%
(
60 of
94)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
83%
(
25 of
30)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
33 of
60)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
35%
(
7 of
20)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
50 of
94)
88
Total Points Won
65
|
6-0 3-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Johan Nikles
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve %
64%
(
18 of
28)
1
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
0
65%
(
24 of
37)
1st Serve Won
22%
(
4 of
18)
46%
(
6 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
40%
(
20 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
52
Total Points Won
26
|
6-2 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mathys Erhard
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve %
74%
(
51 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
33 of
51)
78%
(
14 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
14 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
27 of
69)
74
Total Points Won
56
|
7-6(4) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Houkes Vs Dellavedova Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
