Max Purcell vs Sho Shimabukuro Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Purcell vs Shimabukuro analysis and find out who is favored!
Max Purcell vs Sho Shimabukuro Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Purcell has won 47.35% of points on his second serve, while Shimabukuro has won 51.49%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Purcell, in recent form, has won 46.67% of his opponent's second serve points, while Shimabukuro has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 26.75% and 25.29% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Purcell has saved 60.58% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Shimabukuro has saved 56.59% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Purcell has won 48.44% of matches played (W/L 31/ 33), with Shimabukuro winning 53.85% (W/L 35/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Purcell has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 202/ 139), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 51% (W/L 20/ 19). Shimabukuro has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 67% (W/L 8/ 4), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 54% (W/L 22/ 19).
- Player level: In the last year, Purcell has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 33.33% of matches (W/L 9/ 18), where as Shimabukuro has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 57.14% of matches (W/L 20/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Purcell winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Purcell winning 4 and Shimabukuro winning 1. The last match between Purcell and Shimabukuro was at the Sarasota Challenger, 10-04-2022, Q1 round, Clay with Max Purcell getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:42:38.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Purcell and Shimabukuro have played a deciding set 1 times, with Purcell winning 1 times and Shimabukuro 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Purcell winning 1, and Shimabukuro 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Purcell has played against opponents with an average rank of 203.42 while Shimabukuro has played against players with an average rank of 286.69.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Purcell has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Shimabukuro has won 63% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Purcell has converted 32.43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Shimabukuro has converted 41.12% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Purcell 2 - 0 Shimabukuro
9
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
68
Rank
40
High
25
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
1
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
171
Rank
135
High
26
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
2
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
3
Minor
Form
57% (270-200)
Career Total W/L
62% (212-128)
31% (4-9)
YTD W/L
18% (2-9)
$894,340
Career Prize Money
$196,505
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Purcell VS Shimabukuro H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
stats | Max Purcell | Sho Shimabukuro |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
Games Won | 27 | 22 |
Aces (Total) | 8 | 14 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:42:38 | 1:42:38 |
1st Serve % | 58% (99/171) | 55% (93/168) |
1st Serve Win% | 72% (71/99) | 67% (62/93) |
2nd Serve Win% | 43% (31/72) | 49% (37/75) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 40% (8/20) | 30% (6/20) |
Return Points W% | 41% (69/168) | 40% (69/171) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set L, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (1/0) |
Purcell VS Shimabukuro H2h Matches played
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 7-6(6) |
Max Purcell
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
62%
(
53 of
85)
1st Serve %
60%
(
42 of
70)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
39 of
53)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
38%
(
32 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
70)
79
Total Points Won
76
|
||||
2-6 6-2 6-4 |
Max Purcell
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
53%
(
46 of
86)
1st Serve %
52%
(
51 of
98)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
43%
(
17 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
43%
(
37 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
98)
92
Total Points Won
92
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Max Purcell | Sho Shimabukuro |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 31% (4/9) | 18% (2/9) |
Sets Win/Loss | 37% (13/22) | 31% (8/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 44% (147/190) | 46% (121/143) |
Hard Win/Loss | 27% (3/8) | 17% (1/5) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (1/1) | 20% (1/4) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.64 | 0.35 |
Aces Total | 105 | 45 |
DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.16 |
DFs Total | 39 | 21 |
Avg Match Time | 1:48:27 | 1:41:47 |
Avg Opp Rank | 151.85 | 394.27 |
1st Serve % | 58% (599/1027) | 59% (495/845) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (433/599) | 69% (342/495) |
2nd Serve W% | 51% (217/428) | 51% (179/350) |
BPs Won% Total | 27% (20/73) | 51% (22/43) |
Return Pts W% | 32% (314/990) | 32% (243/752) |
Slam W/L | 50% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 33% (3/6) | 0% (0/4) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (2/4) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 27% (3/11) | 18% (2/11) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 75% (3/4) | 33% (2/6) |
Deciding Set W% | 40% (2/5) | 0% (0/4) |
1st set W, W | 60% (5/3) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set W, L | 40% (5/2) | 50% (4/2) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 0% (7/0) |
Max Purcell Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
R1 |
Gael Monfils
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
50%
(
27 of
54)
10
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Frances Tiafoe
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
43 of
78)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
84)
4
Aces
11
3
Double Faults
6
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
31 of
43)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
17 of
41)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
31%
(
24 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
90
Total Points Won
72
|
4-6 6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Nuno Borges
Player
Max Purcell
55%
(
27 of
49)
1st Serve %
56%
(
36 of
64)
5
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
5
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
24 of
36)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
53%
(
55 of
103)
1st Serve %
58%
(
56 of
97)
5
Aces
7
4
Double Faults
1
67%
(
37 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
35 of
56)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
22 of
41)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
40 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
99
|
6-4 4-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Zachary Svajda
Player
Max Purcell
67%
(
55 of
82)
1st Serve %
43%
(
25 of
58)
5
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
2
73%
(
40 of
55)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
17 of
25)
44%
(
12 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
24 of
58)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Marcos Giron
Player
Max Purcell
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
3
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
0
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
17 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
71)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Mitchell Krueger
59%
(
66 of
112)
1st Serve %
77%
(
66 of
86)
14
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
1
73%
(
48 of
66)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
43 of
66)
52%
(
24 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
36%
(
40 of
112)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
86)
102
Total Points Won
96
|
6-2 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Casper Ruud
Player
Max Purcell
72%
(
126 of
175)
1st Serve %
67%
(
107 of
160)
22
Aces
27
5
Double Faults
6
79%
(
99 of
126)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
84 of
107)
57%
(
28 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
30 of
53)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
8%
(
1 of
13)
27%
(
48 of
175)
Rtn Points Won
29%
(
46 of
160)
173
Total Points Won
162
|
6-3 6-7(5) 6-3 3-6 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Max Purcell
Player
Mate Valkusz
60%
(
81 of
136)
1st Serve %
66%
(
89 of
135)
17
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
11
75%
(
61 of
81)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
66 of
89)
55%
(
30 of
55)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
45 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
48 of
135)
139
Total Points Won
132
|
3-6 7-6(2) 6-4 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Sho Shimabukuro Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Yuta Shimizu
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
43 of
70)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
68)
74
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Rudolf Molleker
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
13
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
28 of
33)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
33 of
44)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
19%
(
9 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
28 of
70)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giovanni Mpetshi Perricard
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
76%
(
42 of
55)
1st Serve %
63%
(
50 of
79)
13
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
1
88%
(
37 of
42)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
34 of
50)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
11 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
29 of
79)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Mattia Bellucci
59%
(
32 of
54)
1st Serve %
64%
(
29 of
45)
5
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
24 of
32)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
16)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
18 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
25 of
45)
61
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Flavio Cobolli
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
54 of
84)
1st Serve %
49%
(
46 of
94)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
40 of
54)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
24 of
46)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
44 of
94)
98
Total Points Won
80
|
3-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Nicolas Moreno De Alboran
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
67%
(
70 of
105)
1st Serve %
59%
(
80 of
136)
8
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
59 of
80)
66%
(
23 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
29 of
56)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
27%
(
28 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
48 of
136)
125
Total Points Won
116
|
7-6(2) 6-7(4) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
64%
(
39 of
61)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
15
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Giovanni Fonio
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
63%
(
51 of
81)
1st Serve %
59%
(
57 of
97)
10
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
1
82%
(
42 of
51)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
28%
(
23 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
43 of
97)
101
Total Points Won
77
|
6-0 6-7(5) 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sho Shimabukuro
Player
Yan Bai
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
0
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
90%
(
9 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
8 of
38)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
58
Total Points Won
26
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Tristan Schoolkate
Player
Sho Shimabukuro
61%
(
62 of
101)
1st Serve %
60%
(
53 of
88)
11
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
79%
(
49 of
62)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
40 of
53)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
33%
(
33 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
29 of
88)
97
Total Points Won
92
|
5-7 6-4 6-3 | H2H |
view more