Maximilian Marterer vs Sumit Nagal Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Marterer vs Nagal analysis and find out who is favored!
Maximilian Marterer vs Sumit Nagal Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Marterer has won 52.77% of points on his second serve, while Nagal has won 55.61%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Marterer, in recent form, has won 51.53% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nagal has won 54.03%. The same stats for first serve returns are 23.53% and 32.87% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Marterer has saved 61.64% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nagal has saved 64.63% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Marterer has won 58.82% of matches played (W/L 40/ 28), with Nagal winning 63.86% (W/L 53/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Marterer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 60% (W/L 69/ 46), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 52% (W/L 13/ 12). Nagal has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 63% (W/L 214/ 124), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Marterer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 74.19% of matches (W/L 23/ 8), where as Nagal has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 67.74% of matches (W/L 42/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Marterer winning 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Marterer winning 2 and Nagal winning 2. The last match between Marterer and Nagal was at the Liberec Challenger, 02-08-2021, First, Clay with Maximilian Marterer getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:28:12.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Marterer and Nagal have played a deciding set 0 times, with Marterer winning 0 times and Nagal 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Marterer winning 0, and Nagal 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Marterer has played against opponents with an average rank of 258.9 while Nagal has played against players with an average rank of 279.72.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Marterer has won 41% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nagal has won 46% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Marterer has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nagal has converted 47.19% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Marterer 1 - 1 Nagal
15
Total
0
Mast
9
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
6
Minor
101
Rank
45
High
28
Age
L
Plays
1
Total1
0
Hard0
1
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
80
Rank
80
High
26
Age
R
Plays
14
Total
0
Mast
5
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
9
Minor
Form
59% (381-261)
Career Total W/L
61% (317-204)
27% (4-11)
YTD W/L
64% (18-10)
$1,511,690
Career Prize Money
$434,190
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Maximilian Marterer | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 20 | 19 |
Aces (Total) | 6 | 7 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 7 |
Avg Match Time | 1:28:12 | 1:28:12 |
1st Serve % | 59% (80/135) | 65% (88/136) |
1st Serve Win% | 73% (58/80) | 66% (58/88) |
2nd Serve Win% | 42% (23/55) | 42% (20/48) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 35% (6/17) | 33% (6/18) |
Return Points W% | 43% (58/136) | 40% (54/135) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-3 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Sumit Nagal
56%
(
35 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
39 of
62)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
57%
(
16 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
22 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
28 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
56
|
||||
6-4 6-4 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Maximilian Marterer
66%
(
49 of
74)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
72)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
1
65%
(
32 of
49)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
41%
(
30 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
32 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
70
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Maximilian Marterer | Sumit Nagal |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 27% (4/11) | 64% (18/10) |
Sets Win/Loss | 31% (11/24) | 65% (44/24) |
Games Win/Loss | 45% (158/195) | 55% (359/288) |
Hard Win/Loss | 38% (3/5) | 64% (14/8) |
Clay Win/Loss | 25% (1/3) | 67% (4/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.39 | 0.17 |
Aces Total | 67 | 55 |
DFs per game | 0.25 | 0.12 |
DFs Total | 43 | 38 |
Avg Match Time | 1:53:46 | 1:56:56 |
Avg Opp Rank | 189 | 214.64 |
1st Serve % | 62% (712/1140) | 70% (1475/2097) |
1st Serve W% | 67% (477/712) | 67% (992/1475) |
2nd Serve W% | 48% (206/428) | 56% (347/622) |
BPs Won% Total | 38% (26/68) | 48% (93/193) |
Return Pts W% | 34% (370/1077) | 40% (820/2042) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/1) | 80% (4/1) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/2) | 50% (4/4) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 27% (3/8) | 33% (1/2) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 100% (1/0) | 75% (9/3) |
Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 29% (4/14) | 65% (17/26) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/1) | 50% (1/2) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 25% (1/4) | 33% (3/9) |
1st set W, W | 75% (4/3) | 76% (21/16) |
1st set W, L | 25% (4/1) | 24% (21/5) |
1st set L, W | 9% (11/1) | 29% (7/2) |
Maximilian Marterer Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Felix Auger Aliassime
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
72 of
120)
1st Serve %
68%
(
79 of
116)
11
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
78%
(
56 of
72)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
55 of
79)
54%
(
26 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
23 of
37)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
32%
(
38 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
38 of
116)
120
Total Points Won
116
|
6-7(5) 7-6(6) 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
50%
(
42 of
84)
1st Serve %
65%
(
62 of
95)
5
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
1
71%
(
30 of
42)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
43 of
62)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
36%
(
30 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Dominic Thiem
Player
Maximilian Marterer
61%
(
52 of
85)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
6
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
7
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
35 of
59)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
31 of
85)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
44 of
95)
98
Total Points Won
82
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 | w/o | H2H | |||
R1 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Elias Ymer
52%
(
26 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
23 of
48)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
28 of
48)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Lukas Klein
Player
Maximilian Marterer
56%
(
27 of
48)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
85%
(
23 of
27)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
12 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
25 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Maximilian Marterer
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
5
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
82%
(
23 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
21%
(
10 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Luca Van Assche
59%
(
60 of
101)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
16
Aces
8
7
Double Faults
3
83%
(
50 of
60)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
40 of
50)
46%
(
19 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
15 of
35)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
32 of
101)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
99
Total Points Won
87
|
5-7 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Maximilian Marterer
Player
Yanki Erel
64%
(
36 of
56)
1st Serve %
62%
(
39 of
63)
3
Aces
2
4
Double Faults
5
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
24 of
39)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
30 of
63)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hugo Grenier
Player
Maximilian Marterer
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
5
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
1
85%
(
34 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
26 of
40)
47%
(
14 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
31%
(
22 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
28 of
72)
76
Total Points Won
66
|
7-6(5) 7-5 | H2H |
view more
Sumit Nagal Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Holger Rune
Player
Sumit Nagal
54%
(
38 of
70)
1st Serve %
63%
(
55 of
88)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
31 of
38)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
34 of
55)
56%
(
18 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
30%
(
21 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
39 of
88)
88
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Matteo Arnaldi
64%
(
64 of
100)
1st Serve %
55%
(
53 of
97)
1
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
6
55%
(
35 of
64)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
36 of
53)
72%
(
26 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
19 of
44)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
39%
(
39 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
42 of
97)
103
Total Points Won
94
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Facundo Diaz Acosta
70%
(
59 of
84)
1st Serve %
67%
(
56 of
84)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
3
63%
(
37 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
43%
(
36 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
37 of
84)
85
Total Points Won
83
|
7-5 2-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Flavio Cobolli
73%
(
52 of
71)
1st Serve %
63%
(
24 of
38)
1
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
0
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Sumit Nagal
58%
(
43 of
74)
1st Serve %
73%
(
62 of
85)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
34 of
43)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
40 of
62)
58%
(
18 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
22 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
28 of
85)
80
Total Points Won
79
|
1-6 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Corentin Moutet
74%
(
66 of
89)
1st Serve %
80%
(
53 of
66)
6
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
2
67%
(
44 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
70%
(
16 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
8 of
13)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
29 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
21 of
66)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Chak Lam Coleman Wong
Player
Sumit Nagal
64%
(
60 of
94)
1st Serve %
70%
(
70 of
100)
16
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
85%
(
51 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
45 of
70)
32%
(
11 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
32 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
39 of
100)
101
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Milos Raonic
Player
Sumit Nagal
51%
(
34 of
67)
1st Serve %
60%
(
38 of
63)
9
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
76%
(
26 of
34)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
52%
(
17 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
24 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
70
Total Points Won
60
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Seong Chan Hong
Player
Sumit Nagal
59%
(
54 of
92)
1st Serve %
76%
(
65 of
85)
8
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
3
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
48 of
65)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
7 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
37%
(
34 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
88
Total Points Won
89
|
2-6 6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Sumit Nagal
Player
Stefan Dostanic
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
0
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
21 of
27)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
65%
(
11 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
30 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H |
view more