Mert Naci Turker vs Charles Minc Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Turker vs Minc analysis and find out who is favored!
Mert Naci Turker vs Charles Minc Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Turker has won 49.59% of points on his second serve, while Minc has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Turker, in recent form, has won 52.07% of his opponent's second serve points, while Minc has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 33.75% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Turker has saved 54.08% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Minc has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Turker has won 57.58% of matches played (W/L 19/ 14), with Minc winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Turker has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 47% (W/L 99/ 112), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Minc has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 41% (W/L 12/ 17), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 17% (W/L 1/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Turker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 57.58% of matches (W/L 19/ 14), where as Minc has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Turker winning 1 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Turker winning 2 and Minc winning 1. The last match between Turker and Minc was at the M15 Antalya, 22-12-2020, Q3, Clay with Mert Naci Turker getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Turker and Minc have played a deciding set 1 times, with Turker winning 1 times and Minc 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Turker winning 0, and Minc 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Turker has played against opponents with an average rank of 148.45 while Minc has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Turker has won 75% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Minc has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Turker has converted 38.46% of breakpoint opportunities, and Minc has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Turker 1 - 0 Minc
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
30
Age
A
Plays
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
Form
45% (131-158)
Career Total W/L
38% (24-40)
60% (6-4)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$1,750
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Mert Naci Turker | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
Games Won | 21 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 0 |
DFs (Total) | 0 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 0:0:0 | 0:0:0 |
1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Points W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 5-7 10-8 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Mert Naci Turker | Charles Minc |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (13/12) | 0% (0/0) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (133/130) | 0% (0/0) |
Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.05 | 0 |
Aces Total | 6 | 0 |
DFs per game | 0.12 | 0 |
DFs Total | 16 | 0 |
Avg Match Time | 1:25:18 | N/A |
Avg Opp Rank | 260.2 | 0 |
1st Serve % | 64% (348/547) | 0% (0/0) |
1st Serve W% | 62% (216/348) | 0% (0/0) |
2nd Serve W% | 46% (91/199) | 0% (0/0) |
BPs Won% Total | 37% (17/46) | 0% (0/0) |
Return Pts W% | 39% (202/516) | 0% (0/0) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 60% (6/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 60% (6/10) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (4/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 33% (6/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Mert Naci Turker Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Mert Naci Turker
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve %
55%
(
47 of
85)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
23 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
82
Total Points Won
67
|
7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Mathys Erhard
Player
Mert Naci Turker
58%
(
62 of
107)
1st Serve %
64%
(
70 of
109)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
63%
(
39 of
62)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
49 of
70)
53%
(
24 of
45)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
16 of
39)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
41%
(
44 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
44 of
109)
107
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 3-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Bogdan Pavel
66%
(
58 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
80)
1
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
3
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
38%
(
33 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
80)
82
Total Points Won
86
|
6-3 0-6 7-6(0) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Mert Naci Turker
67%
(
32 of
48)
1st Serve %
65%
(
35 of
54)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
78%
(
25 of
32)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
6 of
19)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
15 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
28 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
QF |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Bautista Vilicich
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve %
70%
(
62 of
89)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
37 of
62)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
80
Total Points Won
73
|
3-6 7-6(1) 10-5 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q2 | 6-0 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Quentin Folliot
Player
Mert Naci Turker
45%
(
23 of
51)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
43%
(
12 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
39 of
69)
71
Total Points Won
49
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Mert Naci Turker
Player
Mihai Razvan Marinescu
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
70%
(
54 of
77)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
1
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
42%
(
33 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 4-6 13-11 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H |
view more
Charles Minc Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q1 | 5-7 6-3 10-5 | H2H | |||
QF |
Mihai Alexandru Coman
Player
Charles Minc
67%
(
34 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
6
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
4
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
47%
(
8 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
8 of
23)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 7-5 7-6(1) | H2H | |||
QF |
Hong-Lin Fu
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
31 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
32 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
4
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
24 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
51
|
3-6 6-1 10-6 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
Q1 |
Liam Hignett
Player
Charles Minc
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
53%
(
25 of
47)
7
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
1
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
24 of
47)
57
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Alexandre Reco
Player
Charles Minc
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
46%
(
24 of
52)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
3
83%
(
20 of
24)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
11 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
60
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-0 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Noah Schlagenhauf
Player
Charles Minc
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
69%
(
43 of
62)
1
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
0
61%
(
19 of
31)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
67
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Buvaysar Gadamauri
Player
Charles Minc
58%
(
23 of
40)
1st Serve %
59%
(
33 of
56)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
78%
(
18 of
23)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
10 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
34
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q2 |
Charles Minc
Player
Hazem Naow
76%
(
38 of
50)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
3
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
1
79%
(
30 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
20 of
34)
50%
(
6 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
6 of
16)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
60
Total Points Won
40
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H |
view more