Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Geerts vs Bart Van Den Berg Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Geerts vs Berg analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Geerts vs Bart Van Den Berg Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 52.78% of points on his second serve, while Berg has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 50.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Berg has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.6% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 65.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Berg has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 45.95% of matches played (W/L 34/ 40), with Berg winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Berg has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 61/ 43), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.82% of matches (W/L 23/ 32), where as Berg has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Geerts winning 2 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Geerts winning 4 and Berg winning 1. The last match between Geerts and Berg was at the M15 Eupen, 08-08-2019, Second, Clay with Michael Geerts getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:37:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Berg have played a deciding set 1 times, with Geerts winning 1 times and Berg 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 0, and Berg 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.53 while Berg has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Berg has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 40.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Berg has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Geerts 2 - 0 Berg
330
Rank
212
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
0
Hard0
2
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
High
30
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
57% (338-260)
Career Total W/L
57% (85-65)
50% (14-14)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Geerts | Bart Van Den Berg |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 1 |
| Games Won | 27 | 14 |
| Aces (Total) | 5 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 5 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:37:0 | 1:37:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 62% (69/112) | 62% (89/143) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 81% (56/69) | 54% (48/89) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 42% (18/43) | 46% (25/54) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (11/20) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 49% (70/143) | 34% (38/112) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 6-2 |
Stats 
Michael Geerts
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
96%
(
24 of
25)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
||||
| 6-3 3-6 6-1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
60%
(
44 of
73)
1st Serve %
63%
(
54 of
86)
5
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
41%
(
12 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
40%
(
29 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
86)
85
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Geerts | Bart Van Den Berg |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (14/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (33/33) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (347/333) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (7/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:7 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.5 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1326/2159) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (953/1326) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (435/833) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (67/169) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (807/2202) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (13/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (14/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 0% (0/0) |
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Michael Geerts
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Lorenzo Rottoli
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Michael Geerts
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Elias Ymer
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Buldorini
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Bart Van Den Berg Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Alvaro Lopez San Martin
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
36 of
66)
2
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
8
92%
(
22 of
24)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
25 of
36)
73%
(
11 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
8 of
30)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
33 of
66)
66
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Julian Cash
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve %
60%
(
27 of
45)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
6 of
31)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
15 of
45)
40
Total Points Won
36
|
7-5 0-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Dennis Uspensky
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
66%
(
45 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
40 of
69)
0
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
0
80%
(
36 of
45)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Ahmed Mounir
51%
(
19 of
37)
1st Serve %
58%
(
21 of
36)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
72%
(
26 of
36)
52
Total Points Won
21
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jose Fco. Vidal Azorin
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
67%
(
36 of
54)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
12 of
32)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Pierre Delage
58%
(
54 of
93)
1st Serve %
58%
(
73 of
125)
3
Aces
7
5
Double Faults
4
70%
(
38 of
54)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
46 of
73)
49%
(
19 of
39)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
23 of
52)
50%
(
6 of
12)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
56 of
125)
113
Total Points Won
105
|
6-7(6) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Prevosto
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
52%
(
29 of
56)
2
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
20 of
29)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
11 of
27)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
13 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Victor Ernaelsteen
54%
(
37 of
69)
1st Serve %
48%
(
42 of
87)
5
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
84%
(
31 of
37)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
39 of
87)
89
Total Points Won
67
|
6-2 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jesper De Jong
Player
Bart Van Den Berg
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
38%
(
9 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
25 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Bart Van Den Berg
Player
Rayane Oumaouche
66%
(
38 of
58)
1st Serve %
50%
(
20 of
40)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
6
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
13 of
20)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
17 of
40)
57
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Geerts Vs Berg Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
