Michael Geerts vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Geerts vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Geerts vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 53.68% of points on his second serve, while Ilkel has won 47.92%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 49.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 52.8%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 25.2% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 64.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 57.14% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 45.21% of matches played (W/L 33/ 40), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 18/ 27) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 253/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 40.74% of matches (W/L 22/ 32), where as Ilkel has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 37.5% of matches (W/L 12/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Geerts winning 0 times. They have played 5 sets in total, with Geerts winning 1 and Ilkel winning 4. The last match between Geerts and Ilkel was at the Pozoblanco Challenger, 24-07-2021, Semifinals, Hard with Cem Ilkel getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:21:17.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Geerts winning 0 times and Ilkel 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.19 while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 253.76.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 38.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 43.75% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Geerts 0 - 2 Ilkel
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
296
Rank
212
High
29
Age
R
Plays
0
Total2
0
Hard2
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
390
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
1
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
4
Minor
Form
57% (336-257)
Career Total W/L
57% (399-307)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
47% (7-8)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Michael Geerts | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 0 | 2 |
Sets Won | 1 | 4 |
Games Won | 16 | 30 |
Aces (Total) | 9 | 13 |
DFs (Total) | 6 | 1 |
Avg Match Time | 1:21:17 | 1:21:17 |
1st Serve % | 63% (74/118) | 54% (50/92) |
1st Serve Win% | 69% (51/74) | 88% (44/50) |
2nd Serve Win% | 48% (21/44) | 57% (24/42) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 0% (0/4) | 21% (3/14) |
Return Points W% | 26% (24/92) | 39% (46/118) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/2) | 100% (2/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 100% (2/2) |
1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-2 6-7(3) 6-4 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Michael Geerts
54%
(
50 of
92)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
118)
13
Aces
9
1
Double Faults
6
88%
(
44 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
24 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
46 of
118)
114
Total Points Won
96
|
||||
6-1 6-2 |
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michael Geerts | Cem Ilkel |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 47% (7/8) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 42% (14/19) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (285/269) | 46% (136/160) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 50% (2/2) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (7/7) | 45% (5/6) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.53 |
Aces Total | 114 | 76 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.2 |
DFs Total | 53 | 29 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:11 | 1:25:17 |
Avg Opp Rank | 253.74 | 194.87 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1097/1751) | 58% (510/882) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (791/1097) | 71% (363/510) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (344/654) | 46% (170/372) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (56/145) | 44% (27/62) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1815) | 37% (318/859) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 50% (7/7) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 43% (6/14) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 75% (3/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 83% (6/5) |
1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 17% (6/1) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 22% (9/2) |
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Geerts
Player
Elias Ymer
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Buldorini
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Geerts
Player
Oscar Otte
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
7
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
77%
(
72 of
94)
11
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
34 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Johan Nikles
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
54%
(
30 of
56)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
16 of
30)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
6 of
26)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
19 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
34 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
41
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Illya Marchenko
61%
(
46 of
76)
1st Serve %
59%
(
53 of
90)
10
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
76%
(
35 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
39 of
53)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
17 of
37)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
23 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
34 of
90)
87
Total Points Won
79
|
7-6(6) 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Kyle Edmund
55%
(
56 of
102)
1st Serve %
55%
(
54 of
98)
12
Aces
3
6
Double Faults
5
80%
(
45 of
56)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
38 of
54)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
3 of
12)
37%
(
38 of
102)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
39 of
98)
103
Total Points Won
97
|
3-6 7-6(5) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Arthur Bouquier
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
40 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
42 of
71)
13
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
2
88%
(
35 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
28 of
42)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
13 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
27 of
71)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Gastao Elias
Player
Cem Ilkel
60%
(
62 of
103)
1st Serve %
60%
(
52 of
87)
6
Aces
8
1
Double Faults
2
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
38 of
52)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
42 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
36 of
87)
97
Total Points Won
93
|
3-6 6-1 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
QF |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Marat Sharipov (RUS)
71%
(
15 of
21)
1st Serve %
60%
(
12 of
20)
5
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
80%
(
12 of
15)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
7 of
12)
67%
(
4 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
24%
(
5 of
21)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
27
Total Points Won
14
|
6-1 ret. | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Cem Ilkel
Player
Vladyslav Orlov
62%
(
42 of
68)
1st Serve %
50%
(
32 of
64)
7
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
32 of
42)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
24 of
32)
54%
(
14 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
14 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
32%
(
22 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
2-6 6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
Rubber 1 | 6-3 6-2 | H2H |
view more