Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Michael Geerts vs Emilio Nava Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Geerts vs Nava analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Geerts vs Emilio Nava Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 52.78% of points on his second serve, while Nava has won 49.23%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 50.38% of his opponent's second serve points, while Nava has won 48%. The same stats for first serve returns are 28.6% and 27.6% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 65.35% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Nava has saved 67.84% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 45.95% of matches played (W/L 34/ 40), with Nava winning 61.04% (W/L 47/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Nava has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 67% (W/L 62/ 30), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 55% (W/L 24/ 20).
- Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.82% of matches (W/L 23/ 32), where as Nava has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 60% of matches (W/L 30/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Geerts winning 2 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Geerts winning 4 and Nava winning 0. The last match between Geerts and Nava was at the Segovia Challenger, 29-07-2022, Quarterfinals, Hard with Michael Geerts getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:44:20.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Nava have played a deciding set 0 times, with Geerts winning 0 times and Nava 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 2 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 2, and Nava 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 260.53 while Nava has played against players with an average rank of 284.92.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Nava has won 65% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 40.63% of breakpoint opportunities, and Nava has converted 39.49% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Geerts 2 - 0 Nava
330
Rank
212
High
29
Age
R
Plays
2
Total0
2
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
124
Rank
124
High
22
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
L
57% (338-260)
Career Total W/L
60% (170-113)
50% (14-14)
YTD W/L
62% (16-10)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$402,385
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Michael Geerts | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 2 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 4 | 0 |
| Games Won | 26 | 20 |
| Aces (Total) | 12 | 15 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:44:20 | 1:44:20 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (89/133) | 72% (114/159) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 78% (69/89) | 68% (77/114) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 64% (28/44) | 44% (20/45) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 33% (1/3) |
| Return Points W% | 39% (62/159) | 27% (36/133) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/2) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (2/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (2/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
Michael Geerts
Player
Emilio Nava
63%
(
36 of
57)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
5
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
2
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
26 of
34)
67%
(
14 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
25%
(
14 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
19 of
52)
62
Total Points Won
47
|
||||
| 7-6(2) 7-6(3) |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Emilio Nava
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve %
75%
(
80 of
107)
7
Aces
10
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
40 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
51 of
80)
61%
(
14 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
22 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
107)
97
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Michael Geerts | Emilio Nava |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 50% (14/14) | 62% (16/10) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (33/33) | 59% (35/24) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (347/333) | 53% (320/285) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 61% (11/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 50% (4/4) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (7/7) | 67% (4/2) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.38 | 0.71 |
| Aces Total | 126 | 210 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.24 |
| DFs Total | 66 | 72 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:55:7 | 1:43:55 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 257.5 | 289.62 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (1326/2159) | 63% (1237/1949) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (953/1326) | 73% (902/1237) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (435/833) | 50% (358/712) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (67/169) | 41% (63/152) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (807/2202) | 36% (652/1834) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/1) | 63% (5/3) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 54% (13/11) | 60% (6/4) |
| Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (14/28) | 62% (16/26) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 31% (4/13) |
| Deciding Set W% | 50% (5/10) | 57% (4/7) |
| 1st set W, W | 73% (15/11) | 93% (15/14) |
| 1st set W, L | 27% (15/4) | 7% (15/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 23% (13/3) | 18% (11/2) |
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Andrea Pellegrino
Player
Michael Geerts
72%
(
47 of
65)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
4
81%
(
38 of
47)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
39%
(
7 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
20 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
33 of
77)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(4) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Filip Misolic
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
53 of
77)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
4
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
83%
(
44 of
53)
1st Serve Won
84%
(
37 of
44)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
100%
(
1 of
1)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
27%
(
21 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
80
Total Points Won
68
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Lorenzo Rottoli
61%
(
40 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
31 of
55)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
23 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
32%
(
21 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
55)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
7-6(2) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Nicholas David Ionel
Player
Michael Geerts
75%
(
73 of
97)
1st Serve %
54%
(
55 of
102)
0
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
71%
(
52 of
73)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
35 of
55)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
22 of
47)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
36%
(
35 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
102)
107
Total Points Won
92
|
7-6(7) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Oriol Roca Batalla
53%
(
49 of
92)
1st Serve %
57%
(
53 of
93)
0
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
1
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
37 of
53)
63%
(
27 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
22 of
40)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
34 of
93)
94
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Elias Ymer
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Buldorini
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jaime Faria
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Emilio Nava Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Ugo Blanchet
Player
Emilio Nava
51%
(
37 of
72)
1st Serve %
57%
(
51 of
89)
1
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
24 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Mathys Erhard
61%
(
54 of
88)
1st Serve %
58%
(
41 of
71)
2
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
76%
(
41 of
54)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
31 of
41)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
35%
(
31 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
26 of
71)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Roberto Bautista Agut
Player
Emilio Nava
80%
(
66 of
83)
1st Serve %
72%
(
57 of
79)
1
Aces
14
1
Double Faults
2
68%
(
45 of
66)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
40 of
57)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
28 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
31 of
79)
86
Total Points Won
76
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yoshihito Nishioka
60%
(
52 of
86)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
8
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
0
75%
(
39 of
52)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
56%
(
19 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
31 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
79
|
7-5 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Quentin Halys
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
42%
(
25 of
59)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
85%
(
35 of
41)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
20 of
25)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
19%
(
11 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
18 of
59)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Quentin Halys
Player
Emilio Nava
49%
(
35 of
72)
1st Serve %
68%
(
47 of
69)
3
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
1
86%
(
30 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
26%
(
19 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
26 of
69)
79
Total Points Won
62
|
6-1 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Yannick Hanfmann
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve %
56%
(
29 of
52)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
66%
(
19 of
29)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
7 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
34%
(
15 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
30 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
37
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Vit Kopriva
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
54%
(
34 of
63)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
7
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
68
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Emilio Nava
Player
Benjamin Hassan
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
28 of
49)
6
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
25 of
31)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
22 of
28)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
12 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
21 of
49)
61
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Denis Kudla
Player
Emilio Nava
64%
(
29 of
45)
1st Serve %
63%
(
43 of
68)
4
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
69
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Geerts Vs Nava Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us support@matchstat.com
