Michael Geerts vs Jakub Paul Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Geerts vs Paul analysis and find out who is favored!
Michael Geerts vs Jakub Paul Important H2H Prediction Stats:
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Geerts has won 53.68% of points on his second serve, while Paul has won 50.16%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Geerts, in recent form, has won 49.37% of his opponent's second serve points, while Paul has won 58.54%. The same stats for first serve returns are 29.32% and 37.13% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Geerts has saved 64.68% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Paul has saved 59.49% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Geerts has won 45.95% of matches played (W/L 34/ 40), with Paul winning 63.64% (W/L 42/ 24) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Geerts has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 155/ 95), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Paul has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 64/ 35), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 48% (W/L 28/ 30).
- Player level: In the last year, Geerts has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 41.82% of matches (W/L 23/ 32), where as Paul has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 67.86% of matches (W/L 38/ 18). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Geerts winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Geerts winning 2 and Paul winning 0. The last match between Geerts and Paul was at the Troyes Challenger, 28-06-2022, First, Clay with Michael Geerts getting the victory .
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:30:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Geerts and Paul have played a deciding set 0 times, with Geerts winning 0 times and Paul 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Geerts winning 0, and Paul 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Geerts has played against opponents with an average rank of 257.92 while Paul has played against players with an average rank of 230.27.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Geerts has won 50% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Paul has won 53% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Geerts has converted 38.94% of breakpoint opportunities, and Paul has converted 52.74% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Geerts 1 - 0 Paul
8
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
8
Minor
296
Rank
212
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
509
Rank
438
High
25
Age
R
Plays
5
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
5
Minor
Form
57% (336-257)
Career Total W/L
55% (173-143)
52% (12-11)
YTD W/L
65% (13-7)
$34,000
Career Prize Money
$2,285
0
YTD Titles
1
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
stats | Michael Geerts | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
Games Won | 12 | 6 |
Aces (Total) | 3 | 2 |
DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
Avg Match Time | 1:30:28 | 1:30:28 |
1st Serve % | 49% (33/68) | 58% (36/62) |
1st Serve Win% | 76% (25/33) | 61% (22/36) |
2nd Serve Win% | 49% (17/35) | 42% (11/26) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 50% (4/8) | 14% (1/7) |
Return Points W% | 47% (29/62) | 38% (26/68) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-2 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Jakub Paul
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
36 of
62)
3
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
49%
(
17 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
26 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Michael Geerts | Jakub Paul |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 52% (12/11) | 65% (13/7) |
Sets Win/Loss | 52% (28/26) | 60% (27/18) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (285/269) | 53% (223/197) |
Hard Win/Loss | 50% (3/3) | 69% (9/4) |
Clay Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 50% (7/7) | 57% (4/3) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.42 | 0.11 |
Aces Total | 114 | 23 |
DFs per game | 0.19 | 0.17 |
DFs Total | 53 | 35 |
Avg Match Time | 1:52:11 | 1:37:45 |
Avg Opp Rank | 253.74 | 230.15 |
1st Serve % | 63% (1097/1751) | 67% (912/1364) |
1st Serve W% | 72% (791/1097) | 62% (562/912) |
2nd Serve W% | 53% (344/654) | 51% (231/452) |
BPs Won% Total | 39% (56/145) | 52% (75/145) |
Return Pts W% | 37% (673/1815) | 44% (593/1354) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 55% (11/9) | 60% (3/2) |
Futures W/L | 33% (1/2) | 67% (10/5) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 52% (12/23) | 63% (12/19) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 100% (1/1) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 27% (3/11) | 60% (3/5) |
Deciding Set W% | 50% (4/8) | 75% (3/4) |
1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 91% (11/10) |
1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 9% (11/1) |
1st set L, W | 30% (10/3) | 33% (9/3) |
Michael Geerts Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 |
Filip Krajinovic
Player
Michael Geerts
65%
(
47 of
72)
1st Serve %
52%
(
30 of
58)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
23 of
30)
64%
(
16 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
36%
(
26 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Geerts
Player
Elias Ymer
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
72)
4
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
41%
(
31 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
72)
81
Total Points Won
66
|
6-4 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Peter Buldorini
62%
(
34 of
55)
1st Serve %
67%
(
37 of
55)
2
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
6 of
18)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
35%
(
19 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Keegan Smith
Player
Michael Geerts
71%
(
54 of
76)
1st Serve %
68%
(
50 of
73)
7
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
1
80%
(
43 of
54)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
78%
(
18 of
23)
11%
(
1 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
28%
(
21 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
24 of
73)
79
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Jaime Faria
Player
Michael Geerts
58%
(
60 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
3
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
8
63%
(
38 of
60)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
44%
(
19 of
43)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
45%
(
46 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
91
Total Points Won
88
|
4-6 6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Matthew Dellavedova
49%
(
33 of
68)
1st Serve %
63%
(
42 of
67)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
73%
(
24 of
33)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
60%
(
21 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
28 of
67)
73
Total Points Won
62
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Hazem Naow
Player
Michael Geerts
66%
(
69 of
105)
1st Serve %
66%
(
64 of
97)
8
Aces
11
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
52 of
69)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
46 of
64)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
16 of
33)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
33%
(
35 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
97)
105
Total Points Won
97
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
QF |
Michael Geerts
Player
Oscar Otte
61%
(
65 of
106)
1st Serve %
63%
(
74 of
117)
7
Aces
13
4
Double Faults
0
80%
(
52 of
65)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
51 of
74)
49%
(
20 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
23 of
43)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
32%
(
34 of
106)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
43 of
117)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
5-7 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Michael Geerts
Player
Kenny de Schepper
67%
(
76 of
113)
1st Serve %
77%
(
72 of
94)
11
Aces
13
1
Double Faults
3
74%
(
56 of
76)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
53 of
72)
62%
(
23 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
34 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
30 of
94)
109
Total Points Won
98
|
6-7(5) 6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Kenny de Schepper
Player
Michael Geerts
69%
(
58 of
84)
1st Serve %
66%
(
58 of
88)
11
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
1
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
42 of
58)
46%
(
12 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
33%
(
28 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
34 of
88)
90
Total Points Won
82
|
3-6 6-2 6-3 | H2H |
view more
Jakub Paul Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Henri Squire
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
8
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
25 of
52)
65
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Tomas Lanik
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
62%
(
61 of
99)
1
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
6
64%
(
32 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
43%
(
19 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
14 of
38)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
43 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
46 of
99)
97
Total Points Won
96
|
1-6 7-6(8) 6-0 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alexander Ritschard
Player
Jakub Paul
78%
(
67 of
86)
1st Serve %
65%
(
67 of
103)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
66%
(
44 of
67)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
48 of
67)
47%
(
9 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
13 of
36)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
33 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
42 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
94
|
3-6 7-6(6) 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Remy Bertola
59%
(
36 of
61)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
73)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
5
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
30 of
42)
68%
(
17 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
19 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
73
Total Points Won
61
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
Jakub Paul
Player
Vincent Marysko
70%
(
40 of
57)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
83%
(
33 of
40)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
22 of
33)
41%
(
7 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
30%
(
17 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
29 of
60)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
2-6 6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Mikalai Haliak
67%
(
59 of
88)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
2
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
26 of
44)
48%
(
14 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
44%
(
39 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
35 of
70)
84
Total Points Won
74
|
7-5 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Yasutaka Uchiyama
Player
Jakub Paul
45%
(
29 of
64)
1st Serve %
65%
(
43 of
66)
4
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
43%
(
15 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
11 of
23)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
38%
(
24 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
31 of
66)
71
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Thomas Deschamps
Player
Jakub Paul
74%
(
54 of
73)
1st Serve %
69%
(
46 of
67)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
30 of
46)
42%
(
8 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
36%
(
26 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
29 of
67)
76
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
R1 |
Jakub Paul
Player
Matthew William Donald
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
70%
(
48 of
69)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
8
56%
(
24 of
43)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
26 of
48)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
3 of
3)
44%
(
28 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
37 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-6(2) | H2H | ||
QF |
Federico Cina
Player
Jakub Paul
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve %
60%
(
31 of
52)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
35%
(
9 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
10 of
21)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
40%
(
29 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H |
view more